tokenpocket钱包下载中文版苹果|robot

作者: tokenpocket钱包下载中文版苹果
2024-03-13 01:58:10

Robot - Wikipedia

Robot - Wikipedia

Jump to content

Main menu

Main menu

move to sidebar

hide

Navigation

Main pageContentsCurrent eventsRandom articleAbout WikipediaContact usDonate

Contribute

HelpLearn to editCommunity portalRecent changesUpload file

Search

Search

Create account

Log in

Personal tools

Create account Log in

Pages for logged out editors learn more

ContributionsTalk

Contents

move to sidebar

hide

(Top)

1Summary

2History

Toggle History subsection

2.1Early beginnings

2.2Remote-controlled systems

2.3Early robots

2.4Modern autonomous robots

3Future development and trends

Toggle Future development and trends subsection

3.1New functionalities and prototypes

4Etymology

5Modern robots

Toggle Modern robots subsection

5.1Mobile robot

5.2Industrial robots (manipulating)

5.3Service robot

5.4Educational (interactive) robots

5.5Modular robot

5.6Collaborative robots

6Robots in society

Toggle Robots in society subsection

6.1Autonomy and ethical questions

6.2Military robots

6.3Relationship to unemployment

7Contemporary uses

Toggle Contemporary uses subsection

7.1General-purpose autonomous robots

7.2Factory robots

7.2.1Car production

7.2.2Packaging

7.2.3Electronics

7.2.4Automated guided vehicles (AGVs)

7.2.4.1Early AGV-style robots

7.2.4.2Interim AGV technologies

7.2.4.3Intelligent AGVs (i-AGVs)

7.3Dirty, dangerous, dull, or inaccessible tasks

7.3.1Space probes

7.3.2Telerobots

7.3.3Automated fruit harvesting machines

7.3.4Domestic robots

7.4Military robots

7.5Mining robots

7.6Healthcare

7.6.1Home automation for the elderly and disabled

7.6.2Pharmacies

7.7Research robots

7.7.1Bionic and biomimetic robots

7.7.2Nanorobots

7.7.3Reconfigurable robots

7.7.4Robotic, mobile laboratory operators

7.7.5Soft-bodied robots

7.7.6Swarm robots

7.7.7Haptic interface robots

7.8Contemporary art and sculpture

8Robots in popular culture

Toggle Robots in popular culture subsection

8.1Literature

8.2Robot competitions

8.3Films

8.4Sex robots

8.5Problems depicted in popular culture

9See also

Toggle See also subsection

9.1Specific robotics concepts

9.2Robotics methods and categories

9.3Specific robots and devices

9.4Other related articles

10Further reading

11References

12External links

Toggle the table of contents

Robot

130 languages

AfrikaansAlemannischአማርኛÆngliscالعربيةAragonésঅসমীয়াAsturianuAzərbaycancaتۆرکجهবাংলাBân-lâm-gúБашҡортсаБеларускаяБеларуская (тарашкевіца)Bikol CentralБългарскиBoarischབོད་ཡིགBosanskiBrezhonegCatalàЧӑвашлаČeštinaCymraegDanskDeutschEestiΕλληνικάEspañolEsperantoEstremeñuEuskaraفارسیFiji HindiFrançaisFryskGalego贛語Gĩkũyũ한국어HausaՀայերենहिन्दीHrvatskiIdoIlokanoBahasa IndonesiaInterlinguaIsiZuluÍslenskaItalianoעבריתJawaಕನ್ನಡქართულიҚазақшаKiswahiliKriyòl gwiyannenKurdîКыргызчаລາວLatinaLatviešuLietuviųLombardMagyarМакедонскиമലയാളംमराठीმარგალურიBahasa MelayuMinangkabauမြန်မာဘာသာNederlandsनेपाली日本語НохчийнNorsk bokmålNorsk nynorskNouormandOccitanOʻzbekcha / ўзбекчаਪੰਜਾਬੀپنجابیپښتوPatoisPicardPolskiPortuguêsRomânăRomani čhibRuna SimiРусскийᱥᱟᱱᱛᱟᱲᱤسرائیکیScotsShqipSicilianuSimple EnglishسنڌيSlovenčinaSlovenščinaSoomaaligaکوردیСрпски / srpskiSrpskohrvatski / српскохрватскиSundaSuomiSvenskaதமிழ்Татарча / tatarçaไทยТоҷикӣᏣᎳᎩTürkçeУкраїнськаاردوئۇيغۇرچە / UyghurcheVahcuenghTiếng ViệtVõro文言Winaray吴语ייִדיש粵語ZazakiŽemaitėška中文

Edit links

ArticleTalk

English

ReadView sourceView history

Tools

Tools

move to sidebar

hide

Actions

ReadView sourceView history

General

What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationCite this pageGet shortened URLDownload QR codeWikidata item

Print/export

Download as PDFPrintable version

In other projects

Wikimedia CommonsWikiquote

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Machine capable of carrying out a complex series of actions automatically

This article is about mechanical robots. For software agents, see Bot. For other uses of the term, see Robot (disambiguation).

ASIMO (2000) at the Expo 2005

Articulated welding robots used in a factory are a type of industrial robot.

The quadrupedal military robot Cheetah, an evolution of BigDog (pictured), was clocked as the world's fastest legged robot in 2012, beating the record set by an MIT bipedal robot in 1989.[1]

A robot is a machine—especially one programmable by a computer—capable of carrying out a complex series of actions automatically.[2] A robot can be guided by an external control device, or the control may be embedded within. Robots may be constructed to evoke human form, but most robots are task-performing machines, designed with an emphasis on stark functionality, rather than expressive aesthetics.

Robots can be autonomous or semi-autonomous and range from humanoids such as Honda's Advanced Step in Innovative Mobility (ASIMO) and TOSY's TOSY Ping Pong Playing Robot (TOPIO) to industrial robots, medical operating robots, patient assist robots, dog therapy robots, collectively programmed swarm robots, UAV drones such as General Atomics MQ-1 Predator, and even microscopic nano robots. By mimicking a lifelike appearance or automating movements, a robot may convey a sense of intelligence or thought of its own. Autonomous things are expected to proliferate in the future, with home robotics and the autonomous car as some of the main drivers.[3]

The branch of technology that deals with the design, construction, operation, and application of robots,[4] as well as computer systems for their control, sensory feedback, and information processing is robotics. These technologies deal with automated machines that can take the place of humans in dangerous environments or manufacturing processes, or resemble humans in appearance, behavior, or cognition. Many of today's robots are inspired by nature contributing to the field of bio-inspired robotics. These robots have also created a newer branch of robotics: soft robotics.

From the time of ancient civilization, there have been many accounts of user-configurable automated devices and even automata resembling humans and other animals, such as animatronics, designed primarily as entertainment. As mechanical techniques developed through the Industrial age, there appeared more practical applications such as automated machines, remote-control and wireless remote-control.

The term comes from a Slavic root, robot-, with meanings associated with labor. The word 'robot' was first used to denote a fictional humanoid in a 1920 Czech-language play R.U.R. (Rossumovi Univerzální Roboti – Rossum's Universal Robots) by Karel Čapek, though it was Karel's brother Josef Čapek who was the word's true inventor.[5][6][7] Electronics evolved into the driving force of development with the advent of the first electronic autonomous robots created by William Grey Walter in Bristol, England in 1948, as well as Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machine tools in the late 1940s by John T. Parsons and Frank L. Stulen.

The first commercial, digital and programmable robot was built by George Devol in 1954 and was named the Unimate. It was sold to General Motors in 1961 where it was used to lift pieces of hot metal from die casting machines at the Inland Fisher Guide Plant in the West Trenton section of Ewing Township, New Jersey.[8]

Robots have replaced humans[9] in performing repetitive and dangerous tasks which humans prefer not to do, or are unable to do because of size limitations, or which take place in extreme environments such as outer space or the bottom of the sea. There are concerns about the increasing use of robots and their role in society. Robots are blamed for rising technological unemployment as they replace workers in increasing numbers of functions.[10] The use of robots in military combat raises ethical concerns. The possibilities of robot autonomy and potential repercussions have been addressed in fiction and may be a realistic concern in the future.

Summary

Anthropomorphism in robots:KITT (a fictional robot) is mentally anthropomorphic; it thinks like a human.iCub is physically anthropomorphic; it looks like a human.

The word robot can refer to both physical robots and virtual software agents, but the latter are usually referred to as bots.[11] There is no consensus on which machines qualify as robots but there is general agreement among experts, and the public, that robots tend to possess some or all of the following abilities and functions: accept electronic programming, process data or physical perceptions electronically, operate autonomously to some degree, move around, operate physical parts of itself or physical processes, sense and manipulate their environment, and exhibit intelligent behavior, especially behavior which mimics humans or other animals.[12][13] Related to the concept of a robot is the field of synthetic biology, which studies entities whose nature is more comparable to living things than to machines.

History

Main article: History of robots

The idea of automata originates in the mythologies of many cultures around the world. Engineers and inventors from ancient civilizations, including Ancient China,[14] Ancient Greece, and Ptolemaic Egypt,[15] attempted to build self-operating machines, some resembling animals and humans. Early descriptions of automata include the artificial doves of Archytas,[16] the artificial birds of Mozi and Lu Ban,[17] a "speaking" automaton by Hero of Alexandria, a washstand automaton by Philo of Byzantium, and a human automaton described in the Lie Zi.[14]

Early beginnings

Many ancient mythologies, and most modern religions include artificial people, such as the mechanical servants built by the Greek god Hephaestus[18] (Vulcan to the Romans), the clay golems of Jewish legend and clay giants of Norse legend, and Galatea, the mythical statue of Pygmalion that came to life. Since circa 400 BC, myths of Crete include Talos, a man of bronze who guarded the island from pirates.

In ancient Greece, the Greek engineer Ctesibius (c. 270 BC) "applied a knowledge of pneumatics and hydraulics to produce the first organ and water clocks with moving figures."[19]: 2 [20] In the 4th century BC, the Greek mathematician Archytas of Tarentum postulated a mechanical steam-operated bird he called "The Pigeon". Hero of Alexandria (10–70 AD), a Greek mathematician and inventor, created numerous user-configurable automated devices, and described machines powered by air pressure, steam and water.[21]

Al-Jazari – a musical toy

The 11th century Lokapannatti tells of how the Buddha's relics were protected by mechanical robots (bhuta vahana yanta), from the kingdom of Roma visaya (Rome); until they were disarmed by King Ashoka.[22]

In ancient China, the 3rd-century text of the Lie Zi describes an account of humanoid automata, involving a much earlier encounter between Chinese emperor King Mu of Zhou and a mechanical engineer known as Yan Shi, an 'artificer'. Yan Shi proudly presented the king with a life-size, human-shaped figure of his mechanical 'handiwork' made of leather, wood, and artificial organs.[14] There are also accounts of flying automata in the Han Fei Zi and other texts, which attributes the 5th century BC Mohist philosopher Mozi and his contemporary Lu Ban with the invention of artificial wooden birds (ma yuan) that could successfully fly.[17]

Su Song's astronomical clock tower showing the mechanical figurines which chimed the hours In 1066, the Chinese inventor Su Song built a water clock in the form of a tower which featured mechanical figurines which chimed the hours.[23][24][25] His mechanism had a programmable drum machine with pegs (cams) that bumped into little levers that operated percussion instruments. The drummer could be made to play different rhythms and different drum patterns by moving the pegs to different locations.[25]

Samarangana Sutradhara, a Sanskrit treatise by Bhoja (11th century), includes a chapter about the construction of mechanical contrivances (automata), including mechanical bees and birds, fountains shaped like humans and animals, and male and female dolls that refilled oil lamps, danced, played instruments, and re-enacted scenes from Hindu mythology.[26][27][28]

13th century Muslim scientist Ismail al-Jazari created several automated devices. He built automated moving peacocks driven by hydropower.[29] He also invented the earliest known automatic gates, which were driven by hydropower,[30] created automatic doors as part of one of his elaborate water clocks.[31] One of al-Jazari's humanoid automata was a waitress that could serve water, tea or drinks. The drink was stored in a tank with a reservoir from where the drink drips into a bucket and, after seven minutes, into a cup, after which the waitress appears out of an automatic door serving the drink.[32] Al-Jazari invented a hand washing automaton incorporating a flush mechanism now used in modern flush toilets. It features a female humanoid automaton standing by a basin filled with water. When the user pulls the lever, the water drains and the female automaton refills the basin.[19]

Mark E. Rosheim summarizes the advances in robotics made by Muslim engineers, especially al-Jazari, as follows:Unlike the Greek designs, these Arab examples reveal an interest, not only in dramatic illusion, but in manipulating the environment for human comfort. Thus, the greatest contribution the Arabs made, besides preserving, disseminating and building on the work of the Greeks, was the concept of practical application. This was the key element that was missing in Greek robotic science.[19]: 9 

Model of Leonardo's robot with inner workings. Possibly constructed by Leonardo da Vinci around 1495.[33] In the 14th century, the coronation of Richard II of England featured an automata angel.[34]

In Renaissance Italy, Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519) sketched plans for a humanoid robot around 1495. Da Vinci's notebooks, rediscovered in the 1950s, contained detailed drawings of a mechanical knight now known as Leonardo's robot, able to sit up, wave its arms and move its head and jaw.[35] The design was probably based on anatomical research recorded in his Vitruvian Man. It is not known whether he attempted to build it. According to Encyclopædia Britannica, Leonardo da Vinci may have been influenced by the classic automata of al-Jazari.[29]

In Japan, complex animal and human automata were built between the 17th to 19th centuries, with many described in the 18th century Karakuri zui (Illustrated Machinery, 1796). One such automaton was the karakuri ningyō, a mechanized puppet.[36] Different variations of the karakuri existed: the Butai karakuri, which were used in theatre, the Zashiki karakuri, which were small and used in homes, and the Dashi karakuri which were used in religious festivals, where the puppets were used to perform reenactments of traditional myths and legends.

In France, between 1738 and 1739, Jacques de Vaucanson exhibited several life-sized automatons: a flute player, a pipe player and a duck. The mechanical duck could flap its wings, crane its neck, and swallow food from the exhibitor's hand, and it gave the illusion of digesting its food by excreting matter stored in a hidden compartment.[37] About 30 years later in Switzerland the clockmaker Pierre Jaquet-Droz made several complex mechanical figures that could write and play music. Several of these devices still exist and work.[38]

Remote-controlled systems

The Brennan torpedo, one of the earliest 'guided missiles'

Remotely operated vehicles were demonstrated in the late 19th century in the form of several types of remotely controlled torpedoes. The early 1870s saw remotely controlled torpedoes by John Ericsson (pneumatic), John Louis Lay (electric wire guided), and Victor von Scheliha (electric wire guided).[39]

The Brennan torpedo, invented by Louis Brennan in 1877, was powered by two contra-rotating propellers that were spun by rapidly pulling out wires from drums wound inside the torpedo. Differential speed on the wires connected to the shore station allowed the torpedo to be guided to its target, making it "the world's first practical guided missile".[40] In 1897 the British inventor Ernest Wilson was granted a patent for a torpedo remotely controlled by "Hertzian" (radio) waves[41][42] and in 1898 Nikola Tesla publicly demonstrated a wireless-controlled torpedo that he hoped to sell to the US Navy.[43][44]

In 1903, the Spanish engineer Leonardo Torres Quevedo demonstrated a radio control system called "Telekino" at the Paris Academy of Sciences,[45] which he wanted to use to control an airship of his own design. He obtained some patents in other countries.[46] Unlike the previous mechanisms, which carried out actions of the 'on/off' type, Torres developed a system for controlling any mechanical or electrical device with different states of operation.[47]

The transmitter was capable of sending a family of different codewords by means of a binary telegraph signal to the receiver, which was able to set up a different state of operation in the device being used, depending on the codeword. Specifically, it was able to do up to 19 different actions.[48][49]

Archibald Low, known as the "father of radio guidance systems" for his pioneering work on guided rockets and planes during the First World War. In 1917, he demonstrated a remote controlled aircraft to the Royal Flying Corps and in the same year built the first wire-guided rocket.

Early robots

W. H. Richards with "George", 1932

In 1928, one of the first humanoid robots, Eric, was exhibited at the annual exhibition of the Model Engineers Society in London, where it delivered a speech. Invented by W. H. Richards, the robot's frame consisted of an aluminium body of armour with eleven electromagnets and one motor powered by a twelve-volt power source. The robot could move its hands and head and could be controlled through remote control or voice control.[50] Both Eric and his "brother" George toured the world.[51]

Westinghouse Electric Corporation built Televox in 1926; it was a cardboard cutout connected to various devices which users could turn on and off. In 1939, the humanoid robot known as Elektro was debuted at the 1939 New York World's Fair.[52][53] Seven feet tall (2.1 m) and weighing 265 pounds (120.2 kg), it could walk by voice command, speak about 700 words (using a 78-rpm record player), smoke cigarettes, blow up balloons, and move its head and arms. The body consisted of a steel gear, cam and motor skeleton covered by an aluminum skin. In 1928, Japan's first robot, Gakutensoku, was designed and constructed by biologist Makoto Nishimura.

The German V-1 flying bomb was equipped with systems for automatic guidance and range control, flying on a predetermined course (which could include a 90-degree turn) and entering a terminal dive after a predetermined distance. It was reported as being a 'robot' in contemporary descriptions [54]

Modern autonomous robots

The first electronic autonomous robots with complex behaviour were created by William Grey Walter of the Burden Neurological Institute at Bristol, England in 1948 and 1949. He wanted to prove that rich connections between a small number of brain cells could give rise to very complex behaviors – essentially that the secret of how the brain worked lay in how it was wired up. His first robots, named Elmer and Elsie, were constructed between 1948 and 1949 and were often described as tortoises due to their shape and slow rate of movement. The three-wheeled tortoise robots were capable of phototaxis, by which they could find their way to a recharging station when they ran low on battery power.

Walter stressed the importance of using purely analogue electronics to simulate brain processes at a time when his contemporaries such as Alan Turing and John von Neumann were all turning towards a view of mental processes in terms of digital computation. His work inspired subsequent generations of robotics researchers such as Rodney Brooks, Hans Moravec and Mark Tilden. Modern incarnations of Walter's turtles may be found in the form of BEAM robotics.[55]

The first digitally operated and programmable robot was invented by George Devol in 1954 and was ultimately called the Unimate. This ultimately laid the foundations of the modern robotics industry.[56] Devol sold the first Unimate to General Motors in 1960, and it was installed in 1961 in a plant in Trenton, New Jersey to lift hot pieces of metal from a die casting machine and stack them.[57]

The first palletizing robot was introduced in 1963 by the Fuji Yusoki Kogyo Company.[58] In 1973, a robot with six electromechanically driven axes was patented[59][60][61] by KUKA robotics in Germany, and the programmable universal manipulation arm was invented by Victor Scheinman in 1976, and the design was sold to Unimation.

Commercial and industrial robots are now in widespread use performing jobs more cheaply or with greater accuracy and reliability than humans. They are also employed for jobs which are too dirty, dangerous or dull to be suitable for humans. Robots are widely used in manufacturing, assembly and packing, transport, earth and space exploration, surgery, weaponry, laboratory research, and mass production of consumer and industrial goods.[62]

Future development and trends

External videos Atlas, The Next Generation

Further information: Robotics

Various techniques have emerged to develop the science of robotics and robots. One method is evolutionary robotics, in which a number of differing robots are submitted to tests. Those which perform best are used as a model to create a subsequent "generation" of robots. Another method is developmental robotics, which tracks changes and development within a single robot in the areas of problem-solving and other functions. Another new type of robot is just recently introduced which acts both as a smartphone and robot and is named RoboHon.[63]

As robots become more advanced, eventually there may be a standard computer operating system designed mainly for robots. Robot Operating System (ROS) is an open-source software set of programs being developed at Stanford University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the Technical University of Munich, Germany, among others. ROS provides ways to program a robot's navigation and limbs regardless of the specific hardware involved. It also provides high-level commands for items like image recognition and even opening doors. When ROS boots up on a robot's computer, it would obtain data on attributes such as the length and movement of robots' limbs. It would relay this data to higher-level algorithms. Microsoft is also developing a "Windows for robots" system with its Robotics Developer Studio, which has been available since 2007.[64]

Japan hopes to have full-scale commercialization of service robots by 2025. Much technological research in Japan is led by Japanese government agencies, particularly the Trade Ministry.[65]

Many future applications of robotics seem obvious to people, even though they are well beyond the capabilities of robots available at the time of the prediction.[66][67] As early as 1982 people were confident that someday robots would:[68] 1. Clean parts by removing molding flash 2. Spray paint automobiles with absolutely no human presence 3. Pack things in boxes—for example, orient and nest chocolate candies in candy boxes 4. Make electrical cable harness 5. Load trucks with boxes—a packing problem 6. Handle soft goods, such as garments and shoes 7. Shear sheep 8. prosthesis 9. Cook fast food and work in other service industries 10. Household robot.

Generally such predictions are overly optimistic in timescale.

New functionalities and prototypes

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (August 2021)

In 2008, Caterpillar Inc. developed a dump truck which can drive itself without any human operator.[69] Many analysts believe that self-driving trucks may eventually revolutionize logistics.[70] By 2014, Caterpillar had a self-driving dump truck which is expected to greatly change the process of mining. In 2015, these Caterpillar trucks were actively used in mining operations in Australia by the mining company Rio Tinto Coal Australia.[71][72][73][74] Some analysts believe that within the next few decades, most trucks will be self-driving.[75]

A literate or 'reading robot' named Marge has intelligence that comes from software. She can read newspapers, find and correct misspelled words, learn about banks like Barclays, and understand that some restaurants are better places to eat than others.[76]

Baxter is a new robot introduced in 2012 which learns by guidance. A worker could teach Baxter how to perform a task by moving its hands in the desired motion and having Baxter memorize them. Extra dials, buttons, and controls are available on Baxter's arm for more precision and features. Any regular worker could program Baxter and it only takes a matter of minutes, unlike usual industrial robots that take extensive programs and coding to be used. This means Baxter needs no programming to operate. No software engineers are needed. This also means Baxter can be taught to perform multiple, more complicated tasks. Sawyer was added in 2015 for smaller, more precise tasks.[77]

Prototype cooking robots have been developed and could be programmed for autonomous, dynamic and adjustable preparation of discrete meals.[78][79]

Etymology

See also: Glossary of robotics

A scene from Karel Čapek's 1920 play R.U.R. (Rossum's Universal Robots), showing three robots

The word robot was introduced to the public by the Czech interwar writer Karel Čapek in his play R.U.R. (Rossum's Universal Robots), published in 1920.[6] The play begins in a factory that uses a chemical substitute for protoplasm to manufacture living, simplified people called robots. The play does not focus in detail on the technology behind the creation of these living creatures, but in their appearance they prefigure modern ideas of androids, creatures who can be mistaken for humans. These mass-produced workers are depicted as efficient but emotionless, incapable of original thinking and indifferent to self-preservation. At issue is whether the robots are being exploited and the consequences of human dependence upon commodified labor (especially after a number of specially-formulated robots achieve self-awareness and incite robots all around the world to rise up against the humans).

Karel Čapek himself did not coin the word. He wrote a short letter in reference to an etymology in the Oxford English Dictionary in which he named his brother, the painter and writer Josef Čapek, as its actual originator.[6]

In an article in the Czech journal Lidové noviny in 1933, he explained that he had originally wanted to call the creatures laboři ('workers', from Latin labor). However, he did not like the word, and sought advice from his brother Josef, who suggested roboti. The word robota means literally 'corvée, serf labor', and figuratively 'drudgery, hard work' in Czech and also (more general) "work", "labor" in many Slavic languages (e.g.: Bulgarian, Russian, Serbian, Slovak, Polish, North Macedonian, Ukrainian, archaic Czech, as well as robot in Hungarian). Traditionally the robota (Hungarian robot) was the work period a serf (corvée) had to give for his lord, typically 6 months of the year. The origin of the word is the Old Church Slavonic rabota 'servitude' ('work' in contemporary Bulgarian, North Macedonian and Russian), which in turn comes from the Proto-Indo-European root *orbh-. Robot is cognate with the German root Arbeit 'work'.[80][81]

English pronunciation of the word has evolved relatively quickly since its introduction. In the U.S. during the late 1930s to early 1940s it was pronounced /ˈroʊboʊt/.[82][better source needed] By the late 1950s to early 1960s, some were pronouncing it /ˈroʊbət/, while others used /ˈroʊbɒt/[83] By the 1970s, its current pronunciation /ˈroʊbɒt/ had become predominant.

The word robotics, used to describe this field of study,[4] was coined by the science fiction writer Isaac Asimov. Asimov created the "Three Laws of Robotics" which are a recurring theme in his books. These have since been used by many others to define laws used in fiction. (The three laws are pure fiction, and no technology yet created has the ability to understand or follow them, and in fact most robots serve military purposes, which run quite contrary to the first law and often the third law. "People think about Asimov's laws, but they were set up to point out how a simple ethical system doesn't work. If you read the short stories, every single one is about a failure, and they are totally impractical," said Dr. Joanna Bryson of the University of Bath.[84])

Modern robots

A laparoscopic robotic surgery machine

Mobile robot

Main articles: Mobile robot and Automated guided vehicle

Mobile robots[85] have the capability to move around in their environment and are not fixed to one physical location. An example of a mobile robot that is in common use today is the automated guided vehicle or automatic guided vehicle (AGV). An AGV is a mobile robot that follows markers or wires in the floor, or uses vision or lasers.[86] AGVs are discussed later in this article.

Mobile robots are also found in industry, military and security environments.[87] They also appear as consumer products, for entertainment or to perform certain tasks like vacuum cleaning. Mobile robots are the focus of a great deal of current research and almost every major university has one or more labs that focus on mobile robot research.[88]

Mobile robots are usually used in tightly controlled environments such as on assembly lines because they have difficulty responding to unexpected interference. Because of this most humans rarely encounter robots. However domestic robots for cleaning and maintenance are increasingly common in and around homes in developed countries. Robots can also be found in military applications.[89]

Industrial robots (manipulating)

Main articles: Industrial robot and Manipulator (device)

A pick and place robot in a factory

Industrial robots usually consist of a jointed arm (multi-linked manipulator) and an end effector that is attached to a fixed surface. One of the most common type of end effector is a gripper assembly.

The International Organization for Standardization gives a definition of a manipulating industrial robot in ISO 8373:

"an automatically controlled, reprogrammable, multipurpose, manipulator programmable in three or more axes, which may be either fixed in place or mobile for use in industrial automation applications."[90]

This definition is used by the International Federation of Robotics, the European Robotics Research Network (EURON) and many national standards committees.[91]

Service robot

Main article: Service robot

Most commonly industrial robots are fixed robotic arms and manipulators used primarily for production and distribution of goods. The term "service robot" is less well-defined. The International Federation of Robotics has proposed a tentative definition, "A service robot is a robot which operates semi- or fully autonomously to perform services useful to the well-being of humans and equipment, excluding manufacturing operations."[92]

Educational (interactive) robots

Main article: Educational robotics

Robots are used as educational assistants to teachers. From the 1980s, robots such as turtles were used in schools and programmed using the Logo language.[93][94]

There are robot kits like Lego Mindstorms, BIOLOID, OLLO from ROBOTIS, or BotBrain Educational Robots can help children to learn about mathematics, physics, programming, and electronics. Robotics have also been introduced into the lives of elementary and high school students in the form of robot competitions with the company FIRST (For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology). The organization is the foundation for the FIRST Robotics Competition, FIRST Tech Challenge, FIRST Lego League Challenge and FIRST Lego League Explore competitions.

There have also been robots such as the teaching computer, Leachim (1974).[95] Leachim was an early example of speech synthesis using the using the Diphone synthesis method. 2-XL (1976) was a robot shaped game / teaching toy based on branching between audible tracks on an 8-track tape player, both invented by Michael J. Freeman.[96] Later, the 8-track was upgraded to tape cassettes and then to digital.

Modular robot

Main article: Self-reconfiguring modular robot

Modular robots are a new breed of robots that are designed to increase the use of robots by modularizing their architecture.[97] The functionality and effectiveness of a modular robot is easier to increase compared to conventional robots. These robots are composed of a single type of identical, several different identical module types, or similarly shaped modules, which vary in size. Their architectural structure allows hyper-redundancy for modular robots, as they can be designed with more than 8 degrees of freedom (DOF). Creating the programming, inverse kinematics and dynamics for modular robots is more complex than with traditional robots. Modular robots may be composed of L-shaped modules, cubic modules, and U and H-shaped modules. ANAT technology, an early modular robotic technology patented by Robotics Design Inc., allows the creation of modular robots from U- and H-shaped modules that connect in a chain, and are used to form heterogeneous and homogenous modular robot systems. These "ANAT robots" can be designed with "n" DOF as each module is a complete motorized robotic system that folds relatively to the modules connected before and after it in its chain, and therefore a single module allows one degree of freedom. The more modules that are connected to one another, the more degrees of freedom it will have. L-shaped modules can also be designed in a chain, and must become increasingly smaller as the size of the chain increases, as payloads attached to the end of the chain place a greater strain on modules that are further from the base. ANAT H-shaped modules do not suffer from this problem, as their design allows a modular robot to distribute pressure and impacts evenly amongst other attached modules, and therefore payload-carrying capacity does not decrease as the length of the arm increases. Modular robots can be manually or self-reconfigured to form a different robot, that may perform different applications. Because modular robots of the same architecture type are composed of modules that compose different modular robots, a snake-arm robot can combine with another to form a dual or quadra-arm robot, or can split into several mobile robots, and mobile robots can split into multiple smaller ones, or combine with others into a larger or different one. This allows a single modular robot the ability to be fully specialized in a single task, as well as the capacity to be specialized to perform multiple different tasks.

Modular robotic technology is currently being applied in hybrid transportation,[98] industrial automation,[99] duct cleaning[100] and handling. Many research centres and universities have also studied this technology, and have developed prototypes.

Collaborative robots

A collaborative robot or cobot is a robot that can safely and effectively interact with human workers while performing simple industrial tasks. However, end-effectors and other environmental conditions may create hazards, and as such risk assessments should be done before using any industrial motion-control application.[101]

The collaborative robots most widely used in industries today are manufactured by Universal Robots in Denmark.[102]

Rethink Robotics—founded by Rodney Brooks, previously with iRobot—introduced Baxter in September 2012; as an industrial robot designed to safely interact with neighboring human workers, and be programmable for performing simple tasks.[103] Baxters stop if they detect a human in the way of their robotic arms and have prominent off switches. Intended for sale to small businesses, they are promoted as the robotic analogue of the personal computer.[104] As of May 2014[update], 190 companies in the US have bought Baxters and they are being used commercially in the UK.[10]

Robots in society

TOPIO, a humanoid robot, played ping pong at Tokyo International Robot Exhibition (IREX) 2009.[105][106]

Roughly half of all the robots in the world are in Asia, 32% in Europe, and 16% in North America, 1% in Australasia and 1% in Africa.[107] 40% of all the robots in the world are in Japan,[108] making Japan the country with the highest number of robots.

Autonomy and ethical questions

Main articles: Roboethics and Ethics of artificial intelligence

An android, or robot designed to resemble a human, can appear comforting to some people and disturbing to others.[109]

As robots have become more advanced and sophisticated, experts and academics have increasingly explored the questions of what ethics might govern robots' behavior,[110][111] and whether robots might be able to claim any kind of social, cultural, ethical or legal rights.[112] One scientific team has said that it was possible that a robot brain would exist by 2019.[113] Others predict robot intelligence breakthroughs by 2050.[114] Recent advances have made robotic behavior more sophisticated.[115] The social impact of intelligent robots is subject of a 2010 documentary film called Plug & Pray.[116]

Vernor Vinge has suggested that a moment may come when computers and robots are smarter than humans. He calls this "the Singularity".[117] He suggests that it may be somewhat or possibly very dangerous for humans.[118] This is discussed by a philosophy called Singularitarianism.

In 2009, experts attended a conference hosted by the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) to discuss whether computers and robots might be able to acquire any autonomy, and how much these abilities might pose a threat or hazard. They noted that some robots have acquired various forms of semi-autonomy, including being able to find power sources on their own and being able to independently choose targets to attack with weapons. They also noted that some computer viruses can evade elimination and have achieved "cockroach intelligence." They noted that self-awareness as depicted in science-fiction is probably unlikely, but that there were other potential hazards and pitfalls.[117] Various media sources and scientific groups have noted separate trends in differing areas which might together result in greater robotic functionalities and autonomy, and which pose some inherent concerns.[119][120][121]

Military robots

Some experts and academics have questioned the use of robots for military combat, especially when such robots are given some degree of autonomous functions.[122] There are also concerns about technology which might allow some armed robots to be controlled mainly by other robots.[123] The US Navy has funded a report which indicates that, as military robots become more complex, there should be greater attention to implications of their ability to make autonomous decisions.[124][125] One researcher states that autonomous robots might be more humane, as they could make decisions more effectively. However, other experts question this.[126]

One robot in particular, the EATR, has generated public concerns[127] over its fuel source, as it can continually refuel itself using organic substances.[128] Although the engine for the EATR is designed to run on biomass and vegetation[129] specifically selected by its sensors, which it can find on battlefields or other local environments, the project has stated that chicken fat can also be used.[130]

Manuel De Landa has noted that "smart missiles" and autonomous bombs equipped with artificial perception can be considered robots, as they make some of their decisions autonomously. He believes this represents an important and dangerous trend in which humans are handing over important decisions to machines.[131]

Relationship to unemployment

Main article: Technological unemployment

For centuries, people have predicted that machines would make workers obsolete and increase unemployment, although the causes of unemployment are usually thought to be due to social policy.[132][133][134]

A recent example of human replacement involves Taiwanese technology company Foxconn who, in July 2011, announced a three-year plan to replace workers with more robots. At present the company uses ten thousand robots but will increase them to a million robots over a three-year period.[135]

Lawyers have speculated that an increased prevalence of robots in the workplace could lead to the need to improve redundancy laws.[136]

Kevin J. Delaney said "Robots are taking human jobs. But Bill Gates believes that governments should tax companies' use of them, as a way to at least temporarily slow the spread of automation and to fund other types of employment."[137] The robot tax would also help pay a guaranteed living wage to the displaced workers.

The World Bank's World Development Report 2019 puts forth evidence showing that while automation displaces workers, technological innovation creates more new industries and jobs on balance.[138]

Contemporary uses

A general-purpose robot acts as a guide during the day and a security guard at night.

See also: List of robots

At present, there are two main types of robots, based on their use: general-purpose autonomous robots and dedicated robots.

Robots can be classified by their specificity of purpose. A robot might be designed to perform one particular task extremely well, or a range of tasks less well. All robots by their nature can be re-programmed to behave differently, but some are limited by their physical form. For example, a factory robot arm can perform jobs such as cutting, welding, gluing, or acting as a fairground ride, while a pick-and-place robot can only populate printed circuit boards.

General-purpose autonomous robots

Main article: Autonomous robot

General-purpose autonomous robots can perform a variety of functions independently. General-purpose autonomous robots typically can navigate independently in known spaces, handle their own re-charging needs, interface with electronic doors and elevators and perform other basic tasks. Like computers, general-purpose robots can link with networks, software and accessories that increase their usefulness. They may recognize people or objects, talk, provide companionship, monitor environmental quality, respond to alarms, pick up supplies and perform other useful tasks. General-purpose robots may perform a variety of functions simultaneously or they may take on different roles at different times of day. Some such robots try to mimic human beings and may even resemble people in appearance; this type of robot is called a humanoid robot. Humanoid robots are still in a very limited stage, as no humanoid robot can, as of yet, actually navigate around a room that it has never been in.[139] Thus, humanoid robots are really quite limited, despite their intelligent behaviors in their well-known environments.

Factory robots

Car production

Over the last three decades, automobile factories have become dominated by robots. A typical factory contains hundreds of industrial robots working on fully automated production lines, with one robot for every ten human workers. On an automated production line, a vehicle chassis on a conveyor is welded, glued, painted and finally assembled at a sequence of robot stations.

Packaging

Industrial robots are also used extensively for palletizing and packaging of manufactured goods, for example for rapidly taking drink cartons from the end of a conveyor belt and placing them into boxes, or for loading and unloading machining centers.

Electronics

Mass-produced printed circuit boards (PCBs) are almost exclusively manufactured by pick-and-place robots, typically with SCARA manipulators, which remove tiny electronic components from strips or trays, and place them on to PCBs with great accuracy.[140] Such robots can place hundreds of thousands of components per hour, far out-performing a human in speed, accuracy, and reliability.[141]

Automated guided vehicles (AGVs)

An intelligent AGV drops-off goods without needing lines or beacons in the workspace.

Mobile robots, following markers or wires in the floor, or using vision[86] or lasers, are used to transport goods around large facilities, such as warehouses, container ports, or hospitals.[142]

Early AGV-style robots

Limited to tasks that could be accurately defined and had to be performed the same way every time. Very little feedback or intelligence was required, and the robots needed only the most basic exteroceptors (sensors). The limitations of these AGVs are that their paths are not easily altered and they cannot alter their paths if obstacles block them. If one AGV breaks down, it may stop the entire operation.

Interim AGV technologies

Developed to deploy triangulation from beacons or bar code grids for scanning on the floor or ceiling. In most factories, triangulation systems tend to require moderate to high maintenance, such as daily cleaning of all beacons or bar codes. Also, if a tall pallet or large vehicle blocks beacons or a bar code is marred, AGVs may become lost. Often such AGVs are designed to be used in human-free environments.

Intelligent AGVs (i-AGVs)

Such as SmartLoader,[143] SpeciMinder,[144] ADAM,[145] Tug[146] Eskorta,[147] and MT 400 with Motivity[148] are designed for people-friendly workspaces. They navigate by recognizing natural features. 3D scanners or other means of sensing the environment in two or three dimensions help to eliminate cumulative errors in dead-reckoning calculations of the AGV's current position. Some AGVs can create maps of their environment using scanning lasers with simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) and use those maps to navigate in real time with other path planning and obstacle avoidance algorithms. They are able to operate in complex environments and perform non-repetitive and non-sequential tasks such as transporting photomasks in a semiconductor lab, specimens in hospitals and goods in warehouses. For dynamic areas, such as warehouses full of pallets, AGVs require additional strategies using three-dimensional sensors such as time-of-flight or stereovision cameras.

Dirty, dangerous, dull, or inaccessible tasks

See also: Dirty, dangerous and demeaning

There are many jobs that humans would rather leave to robots. The job may be boring, such as domestic cleaning or sports field line marking, or dangerous, such as exploring inside a volcano.[149] Other jobs are physically inaccessible, such as exploring another planet,[150] cleaning the inside of a long pipe, or performing laparoscopic surgery.[151]

Space probes

Almost every unmanned space probe ever launched was a robot.[152][153] Some were launched in the 1960s with very limited abilities, but their ability to fly and land (in the case of Luna 9) is an indication of their status as a robot. This includes the Voyager probes and the Galileo probes, among others.

Telerobots

A U.S. Marine Corps technician prepares to use a telerobot to detonate a buried improvised explosive device near Camp Fallujah, Iraq.

Teleoperated robots, or telerobots, are devices remotely operated from a distance by a human operator rather than following a predetermined sequence of movements, but which has semi-autonomous behaviour. They are used when a human cannot be present on site to perform a job because it is dangerous, far away, or inaccessible. The robot may be in another room or another country, or may be on a very different scale to the operator. For instance, a laparoscopic surgery robot allows the surgeon to work inside a human patient on a relatively small scale compared to open surgery, significantly shortening recovery time.[151] They can also be used to avoid exposing workers to the hazardous and tight spaces such as in duct cleaning. When disabling a bomb, the operator sends a small robot to disable it. Several authors have been using a device called the Longpen to sign books remotely.[154] Teleoperated robot aircraft, like the Predator Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, are increasingly being used by the military. These pilotless drones can search terrain and fire on targets.[155][156] Hundreds of robots such as iRobot's Packbot and the Foster-Miller TALON are being used in Iraq and Afghanistan by the U.S. military to defuse roadside bombs or improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in an activity known as explosive ordnance disposal (EOD).[157]

Automated fruit harvesting machines

Robots are used to automate picking fruit on orchards at a cost lower than that of human pickers.

Domestic robots

The Roomba domestic vacuum cleaner robot does a single, menial job.

Domestic robots are simple robots dedicated to a single task work in home use. They are used in simple but often disliked jobs, such as vacuum cleaning, floor washing, and lawn mowing. An example of a domestic robot is a Roomba.

Military robots

Main article: Military robot

Military robots include the SWORDS robot which is currently used in ground-based combat. It can use a variety of weapons and there is some discussion of giving it some degree of autonomy in battleground situations.[158][159][160]

Unmanned combat air vehicles (UCAVs), which are an upgraded form of UAVs, can do a wide variety of missions, including combat. UCAVs are being designed such as the BAE Systems Mantis which would have the ability to fly themselves, to pick their own course and target, and to make most decisions on their own.[161] The BAE Taranis is a UCAV built by Great Britain which can fly across continents without a pilot and has new means to avoid detection.[162] Flight trials are expected to begin in 2011.[163]

The AAAI has studied this topic in depth[110] and its president has commissioned a study to look at this issue.[164]

Some have suggested a need to build "Friendly AI", meaning that the advances which are already occurring with AI should also include an effort to make AI intrinsically friendly and humane.[165] Several such measures reportedly already exist, with robot-heavy countries such as Japan and South Korea[166] having begun to pass regulations requiring robots to be equipped with safety systems, and possibly sets of 'laws' akin to Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics.[167][168] An official report was issued in 2009 by the Japanese government's Robot Industry Policy Committee.[169] Chinese officials and researchers have issued a report suggesting a set of ethical rules, and a set of new legal guidelines referred to as "Robot Legal Studies."[170] Some concern has been expressed over a possible occurrence of robots telling apparent falsehoods.[171]

Mining robots

Mining robots are designed to solve a number of problems currently facing the mining industry, including skills shortages, improving productivity from declining ore grades, and achieving environmental targets. Due to the hazardous nature of mining, in particular underground mining, the prevalence of autonomous, semi-autonomous, and tele-operated robots has greatly increased in recent times. A number of vehicle manufacturers provide autonomous trains, trucks and loaders that will load material, transport it on the mine site to its destination, and unload without requiring human intervention. One of the world's largest mining corporations, Rio Tinto, has recently expanded its autonomous truck fleet to the world's largest, consisting of 150 autonomous Komatsu trucks, operating in Western Australia.[172] Similarly, BHP has announced the expansion of its autonomous drill fleet to the world's largest, 21 autonomous Atlas Copco drills.[173]

Drilling, longwall and rockbreaking machines are now also available as autonomous robots.[174] The Atlas Copco Rig Control System can autonomously execute a drilling plan on a drilling rig, moving the rig into position using GPS, set up the drill rig and drill down to specified depths.[175] Similarly, the Transmin Rocklogic system can automatically plan a path to position a rockbreaker at a selected destination.[176] These systems greatly enhance the safety and efficiency of mining operations.

Healthcare

Robots in healthcare have two main functions. Those which assist an individual, such as a sufferer of a disease like Multiple Sclerosis, and those which aid in the overall systems such as pharmacies and hospitals.

Home automation for the elderly and disabled

Further information: Disability robot

The Care-Providing Robot FRIEND

Robots used in home automation have developed over time from simple basic robotic assistants, such as the Handy 1,[177] through to semi-autonomous robots, such as FRIEND which can assist the elderly and disabled with common tasks.

The population is aging in many countries, especially Japan, meaning that there are increasing numbers of elderly people to care for, but relatively fewer young people to care for them.[178][179] Humans make the best carers, but where they are unavailable, robots are gradually being introduced.[180]

FRIEND is a semi-autonomous robot designed to support disabled and elderly people in their daily life activities, like preparing and serving a meal. FRIEND make it possible for patients who are paraplegic, have muscle diseases or serious paralysis (due to strokes etc.), to perform tasks without help from other people like therapists or nursing staff.

Pharmacies

Main article: Pharmacy automation

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (July 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Script Pro manufactures a robot designed to help pharmacies fill prescriptions that consist of oral solids or medications in pill form.[181][better source needed] The pharmacist or pharmacy technician enters the prescription information into its information system. The system, upon determining whether or not the drug is in the robot, will send the information to the robot for filling. The robot has 3 different size vials to fill determined by the size of the pill. The robot technician, user, or pharmacist determines the needed size of the vial based on the tablet when the robot is stocked. Once the vial is filled it is brought up to a conveyor belt that delivers it to a holder that spins the vial and attaches the patient label. Afterwards it is set on another conveyor that delivers the patient's medication vial to a slot labeled with the patient's name on an LED read out. The pharmacist or technician then checks the contents of the vial to ensure it's the correct drug for the correct patient and then seals the vials and sends it out front to be picked up.

McKesson's Robot RX is another healthcare robotics product that helps pharmacies dispense thousands of medications daily with little or no errors.[182] The robot can be ten feet wide and thirty feet long and can hold hundreds of different kinds of medications and thousands of doses. The pharmacy saves many resources like staff members that are otherwise unavailable in a resource scarce industry. It uses an electromechanical head coupled with a pneumatic system to capture each dose and deliver it to either its stocked or dispensed location. The head moves along a single axis while it rotates 180 degrees to pull the medications. During this process it uses barcode technology to verify it's pulling the correct drug. It then delivers the drug to a patient specific bin on a conveyor belt. Once the bin is filled with all of the drugs that a particular patient needs and that the robot stocks, the bin is then released and returned out on the conveyor belt to a technician waiting to load it into a cart for delivery to the floor.

Research robots

See also: Robotics research

While most robots today are installed in factories or homes, performing labour or life saving jobs, many new types of robot are being developed in laboratories around the world. Much of the research in robotics focuses not on specific industrial tasks, but on investigations into new types of robot, alternative ways to think about or design robots, and new ways to manufacture them. It is expected that these new types of robot will be able to solve real world problems when they are finally realized.[citation needed]

Bionic and biomimetic robots

Further information: BiomimeticsFurther information: BionicsOne approach to designing robots is to base them on animals. BionicKangaroo was designed and engineered by studying and applying the physiology and methods of locomotion of a kangaroo.

Nanorobots

Further information: NanoroboticsNanorobotics is the emerging technology field of creating machines or robots whose components are at or close to the microscopic scale of a nanometer (10−9 meters). Also known as "nanobots" or "nanites", they would be constructed from molecular machines. So far, researchers have mostly produced only parts of these complex systems, such as bearings, sensors, and synthetic molecular motors, but functioning robots have also been made such as the entrants to the Nanobot Robocup contest.[183] Researchers also hope to be able to create entire robots as small as viruses or bacteria, which could perform tasks on a tiny scale. Possible applications include micro surgery (on the level of individual cells), utility fog,[184] manufacturing, weaponry and cleaning.[185] Some people have suggested that if there were nanobots which could reproduce, the earth would turn into "grey goo", while others argue that this hypothetical outcome is nonsense.[186][187]

Reconfigurable robots

Main article: Self-reconfiguring modular robot

A few researchers have investigated the possibility of creating robots which can alter their physical form to suit a particular task,[188] like the fictional T-1000. Real robots are nowhere near that sophisticated however, and mostly consist of a small number of cube shaped units, which can move relative to their neighbours. Algorithms have been designed in case any such robots become a reality.[189]

Robotic, mobile laboratory operators

Further information: Laboratory robotics

In July 2020 scientists reported the development of a mobile robot chemist and demonstrate that it can assist in experimental searches. According to the scientists their strategy was automating the researcher rather than the instruments – freeing up time for the human researchers to think creatively – and could identify photocatalyst mixtures for hydrogen production from water that were six times more active than initial formulations. The modular robot can operate laboratory instruments, work nearly around the clock, and autonomously make decisions on his next actions depending on experimental results.[190][191]

Soft-bodied robots

Robots with silicone bodies and flexible actuators (air muscles, electroactive polymers, and ferrofluids) look and feel different from robots with rigid skeletons, and can have different behaviors.[192] Soft, flexible (and sometimes even squishy) robots are often designed to mimic the biomechanics of animals and other things found in nature, which is leading to new applications in medicine, care giving, search and rescue, food handling and manufacturing, and scientific exploration.[193][194]

Swarm robots

Main article: Swarm roboticsInspired by colonies of insects such as ants and bees, researchers are modeling the behavior of swarms of thousands of tiny robots which together perform a useful task, such as finding something hidden, cleaning, or spying. Each robot is quite simple, but the emergent behavior of the swarm is more complex. The whole set of robots can be considered as one single distributed system, in the same way an ant colony can be considered a superorganism, exhibiting swarm intelligence. The largest swarms so far created include the iRobot swarm, the SRI/MobileRobots CentiBots project[195] and the Open-source Micro-robotic Project swarm, which are being used to research collective behaviors.[196][197] Swarms are also more resistant to failure. Whereas one large robot may fail and ruin a mission, a swarm can continue even if several robots fail. This could make them attractive for space exploration missions, where failure is normally extremely costly.[198]

Haptic interface robots

Further information: Haptic technology

Robotics also has application in the design of virtual reality interfaces. Specialized robots are in widespread use in the haptic research community. These robots, called "haptic interfaces", allow touch-enabled user interaction with real and virtual environments. Robotic forces allow simulating the mechanical properties of "virtual" objects, which users can experience through their sense of touch.[199]

Contemporary art and sculpture

Further information: Robotic art

Robots are used by contemporary artists to create works that include mechanical automation. There are many branches of robotic art, one of which is robotic installation art, a type of installation art that is programmed to respond to viewer interactions, by means of computers, sensors and actuators. The future behavior of such installations can therefore be altered by input from either the artist or the participant, which differentiates these artworks from other types of kinetic art.

Le Grand Palais in Paris organized an exhibition "Artists & Robots", featuring artworks created by more than forty artists with the help of robots in 2018.[200]

Robots in popular culture

Toy robots on display at the Museo del Objeto del Objeto in Mexico City

See also: List of fictional robots and androids and Droid (Star Wars)

Literature

Main article: Robots in literature

Robotic characters, androids (artificial men/women) or gynoids (artificial women), and cyborgs (also "bionic men/women", or humans with significant mechanical enhancements) have become a staple of science fiction.

The first reference in Western literature to mechanical servants appears in Homer's Iliad. In Book XVIII, Hephaestus, god of fire, creates new armor for the hero Achilles, assisted by robots.[201] According to the Rieu translation, "Golden maidservants hastened to help their master. They looked like real women and could not only speak and use their limbs but were endowed with intelligence and trained in handwork by the immortal gods." The words "robot" or "android" are not used to describe them, but they are nevertheless mechanical devices human in appearance. "The first use of the word Robot was in Karel Čapek's play R.U.R. (Rossum's Universal Robots) (written in 1920)". Writer Karel Čapek was born in Czechoslovakia (Czech Republic).

Possibly the most prolific author of the twentieth century was Isaac Asimov (1920–1992)[202] who published over five-hundred books.[203] Asimov is probably best remembered for his science-fiction stories and especially those about robots, where he placed robots and their interaction with society at the center of many of his works.[204][205] Asimov carefully considered the problem of the ideal set of instructions robots might be given to lower the risk to humans, and arrived at his Three Laws of Robotics: a robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm; a robot must obey orders given it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law; and a robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.[206] These were introduced in his 1942 short story "Runaround", although foreshadowed in a few earlier stories. Later, Asimov added the Zeroth Law: "A robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm"; the rest of the laws are modified sequentially to acknowledge this.

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the first passage in Asimov's short story "Liar!" (1941) that mentions the First Law is the earliest recorded use of the word robotics. Asimov was not initially aware of this; he assumed the word already existed by analogy with mechanics, hydraulics, and other similar terms denoting branches of applied knowledge.[207]

Robot competitions

Main article: Robot competition

Robots are used in a number of competitive events. Robot combat competitions have been popularized by television shows such as Robot Wars and BattleBots, featuring mostly remotely controlled 'robots' that compete against each other directly using various weaponry, there are also amateur robot combat leagues active globally outside of the televised events. Micromouse events, in which autonomous robots compete to solve mazes or other obstacle courses are also held internationally.

Robot competitions are also often used within educational settings to introduce the concept of robotics to children such as the FIRST Robotics Competition in the US.

Films

See also: Category:Robot films

Robots appear in many films. Most of the robots in cinema are fictional. Two of the most famous are R2-D2 and C-3PO from the Star Wars franchise.

Sex robots

Main article: Sex robot

The concept of humanoid sex robots has drawn public attention and elicited debate regarding their supposed benefits and potential effects on society. Opponents argue that the introduction of such devices would be socially harmful, and demeaning to women and children,[208] while proponents cite their potential therapeutical benefits, particularly in aiding people with dementia or depression.[209]

Problems depicted in popular culture

Italian movie The Mechanical Man (1921), the first film to have shown a battle between robots

Fears and concerns about robots have been repeatedly expressed in a wide range of books and films. A common theme is the development of a master race of conscious and highly intelligent robots, motivated to take over or destroy the human race. Frankenstein (1818), often called the first science fiction novel, has become synonymous with the theme of a robot or android advancing beyond its creator.

Other works with similar themes include The Mechanical Man, The Terminator, Runaway, RoboCop, the Replicators in Stargate, the Cylons in Battlestar Galactica, the Cybermen and Daleks in Doctor Who, The Matrix, Enthiran and I, Robot. Some fictional robots are programmed to kill and destroy; others gain superhuman intelligence and abilities by upgrading their own software and hardware. Examples of popular media where the robot becomes evil are 2001: A Space Odyssey, Red Planet and Enthiran.

The 2017 game Horizon Zero Dawn explores themes of robotics in warfare, robot ethics, and the AI control problem, as well as the positive or negative impact such technologies could have on the environment.

Another common theme is the reaction, sometimes called the "uncanny valley", of unease and even revulsion at the sight of robots that mimic humans too closely.[109]

More recently, fictional representations of artificially intelligent robots in films such as A.I. Artificial Intelligence and Ex Machina and the 2016 TV adaptation of Westworld have engaged audience sympathy for the robots themselves.

See also

Index of robotics articles

Outline of robotics

Artificial intelligence

William Grey Walter

Specific robotics concepts

Robot locomotion

Simultaneous localization and mapping

Tactile sensor

Teleoperation

Uncanny valley

von Neumann machine

Wake-up robot problem

Neuromorphic engineering

Robotics methods and categories

Cognitive robotics

Companion robot

Domestic robot

Epigenetic robotics

Evolutionary robotics

Humanoid robot

Autonomous robot

Swarm robotics

Microbotics

Robot control

Specific robots and devices

AIBO

Autonomous spaceport drone ship

Driverless car

Friendly Robotics

Lely Juno family

Liquid handling robot

Paro (robot)

PatrolBot

RoboBee

Roborior

Robot App Store

Other related articles

Automated guided vehicle

Remote control vehicle

Robot Award

Robot economics

Unmanned vehicle

Further reading

Al-Arshani, Sarah (29 November 2021). "Researchers behind the world's first living robot have found a way to make it reproduce — by shaping it like Pac-Man". Business Insider.

See this humanoid robot artist sketch drawings from sight (CNN, Video, 2019)

Margolius, Ivan. 'The Robot of Prague', Newsletter, The Friends of Czech Heritage no. 17, Autumn 2017, pp. 3 – 6. https://czechfriends.net/images/RobotsMargoliusJul2017.pdf

Glaser, Horst Albert and Rossbach, Sabine: The Artificial Human, Frankfurt/M., Bern, New York 2011 "A Tragical History"

Gutkind, L. (2006). Almost Human: Making Robots Think. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.

Craig, J.J. (2005). Introduction to Robotics, Pearson Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Tsai, L. W. (1999). Robot Analysis. Wiley. New York.

Sotheby's New York. The Tin Toy Robot Collection of Matt Wyse (1996)

DeLanda, Manuel. War in the Age of Intelligent Machines. 1991. Swerve. New York.

Needham, Joseph (1986). Science and Civilization in China: Volume 2. Taipei: Caves Books Ltd.

Cheney, Margaret [1989:123] (1981). Tesla, Man Out of Time. Dorset Press. New York. ISBN 0-88029-419-1

Čapek, Karel (1920). R.U.R. , Aventinum, Prague.

TechCast Article Series, Jason Rupinski and Richard Mix, "Public Attitudes to Androids: Robot Gender, Tasks, & Pricing"

References

^ "Four-legged Robot, 'Cheetah,' Sets New Speed Record". Reuters. 6 March 2012. Archived from the original on 22 October 2013. Retrieved 5 October 2013.

^ Definition of 'robot'. Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved 27 November 2016.

^ "Forecasts – Driverless car market watch". driverless-future.com. Retrieved 26 September 2023.

^ a b "robotics". Oxford Dictionaries. Archived from the original on 18 May 2011. Retrieved 4 February 2011.

^ Margolius, Ivan (Autumn 2017). "The Robot of Prague" (PDF). The Friends of Czech Heritage (17): 3–6. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 September 2017.

^ a b c Zunt, Dominik. "Who did actually invent the word "robot" and what does it mean?". The Karel Čapek website. Archived from the original on 4 February 2012. Retrieved 11 September 2007.

^ Kurfess, Thomas R. (1 January 2005). Robotics and Automation Handbook. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-8493-1804-7. Archived from the original on 4 December 2016. Retrieved 5 July 2016 – via Google Books.

^ Pearce, Jeremy (15 August 2011). "George C. Devol, Inventor of Robot Arm, Dies at 99". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 25 December 2016. Retrieved 7 February 2012. In 1961, General Motors put the first Unimate arm on an assembly line at the company's plant in Ewing Township, N.J., a suburb of Trenton. The device was used to lift and stack die-cast metal parts taken hot from their molds.

^ Akins, Crystal. "5 jobs being replaced by robots". Excelle. Monster. Archived from the original on 24 April 2013. Retrieved 15 April 2013.

^ a b Hoy, Greg (28 May 2014). "Robots could cost Australian economy 5 million jobs, experts warn, as companies look to cut costs". ABC News. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Archived from the original on 29 May 2014. Retrieved 29 May 2014.

^ "Telecom glossary "bot"". Alliance for Telecommunications Solutions. 26 September 2023.

^ Polk, Igor (16 November 2005). "RoboNexus 2005 robot exhibition virtual tour". Robonexus Exhibition 2005. Archived from the original on 12 August 2007. Retrieved 10 September 2007.

^ Harris, Tom (16 April 2002). "How Robots Work". How Stuff Works. Archived from the original on 26 August 2007. Retrieved 10 September 2007.

^ a b c Needham, Joseph (1991). Science and Civilisation in China: Volume 2, History of Scientific Thought. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-05800-1.

^ Currie, Adam (1999). "The History of Robotics". Archived from the original on 18 July 2006. Retrieved 10 September 2007.

^ Noct. Att. L. 10

^ a b Needham, Volume 2, 54.

^ Deborah Levine Gera (2003). Ancient Greek Ideas on Speech, Language, and Civilization. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-925616-7. Archived from the original on 5 December 2016. Retrieved 25 September 2016.

^ a b c Rosheim, Mark E. (1994). Robot evolution: the development of anthrobotics. Wiley-IEEE. ISBN 0-471-02622-0.

^ ""Robots then and now". BBC. 22 July 2004. Archived from the original on 20 December 2010.

^ O'Connor, J.J. and E.F. Robertson. "Heron biography". The MacTutor History of Mathematics archive. Retrieved 26 September 2023.

^ Strong, J.S. (2007). Relics of the Buddha. Princeton University Press. pp. 133–134, 143. ISBN 978-0-691-11764-5.

^ Fowler, Charles B. (October 1967). "The Museum of Music: A History of Mechanical Instruments". Music Educators Journal. 54 (2): 45–49. doi:10.2307/3391092. JSTOR 3391092. S2CID 190524140.

^ "Early Clocks". A Walk Through Time. NIST Physics Laboratory. 12 August 2009. Retrieved 13 October 2022.

^ a b "The programmable robot of ancient Greece". New Scientist: 32–35. 6 July 2007.

^ Varadpande, Manohar Laxman (1987). History of Indian Theatre, Volume 1. Abhinav Publications. p. 68. ISBN 978-81-7017-221-5.

^ Wujastyk, Dominik (2003). The Roots of Ayurveda: Selections from Sanskrit Medical Writings. Penguin. p. 222. ISBN 978-0-14-044824-5.

^ Needham, Joseph (1965). Science and Civilisation in China: Volume 4, Physics and Physical Technology Part 2, Mechanical Engineering. Cambridge University Press. p. 164. ISBN 978-0-521-05803-2.

^ a b "Al-Jazarī | Arab inventor". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 15 June 2019.

^ Howard R. Turner (1997). Science in Medieval Islam: An Illustrated Introduction. University of Texas Press. p. 81. ISBN 0-292-78149-0.

^ Hill, Donald (May 1991). "Mechanical Engineering in the Medieval Near East". Scientific American. pp. 64–69. (cf. Hill, Donald. "History of Sciences in the Islamic World". IX. Mechanical Engineering. Archived from the original on 25 December 2007.)

^ Ancient Discoveries Islamic Science Part1. Archived from the original on 11 December 2021. Retrieved 15 June 2019.

^ Moran, M. E. (December 2006). "The da Vinci robot". J. Endourol. 20 (12): 986–90. doi:10.1089/end.2006.20.986. PMID 17206888. ... the date of the design and possible construction of this robot was 1495 ... Beginning in the 1950s, investigators at the University of California began to ponder the significance of some of da Vinci's markings on what appeared to be technical drawings ... It is now known that da Vinci's robot would have had the outer appearance of a Germanic knight.

^ Truitt, E.R. (2015). Medieval Robots: Mechanism, Magic, Nature, and Art. The Middle Ages Series. University of Pennsylvania Press, Incorporated. p. 136. ISBN 978-0-8122-9140-7. Retrieved 21 January 2023.

^ "Leonardo da Vinci's Robots". Leonardo3.net. Archived from the original on 24 September 2008. Retrieved 25 September 2008.

^ Law, Jane Marie (1997). Puppets of Nostalgia – The Life, Death and Rebirth of the Japanese Awaji Ningyo Tradition. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-02894-1.

^ Wood, Gabby (16 February 2002). "Living Dolls: A Magical History Of The Quest For Mechanical Life". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 20 December 2016.

^ "The Boy Robot of 1774". 21 February 2018.

^ Edwyn Gray, Nineteenth-century torpedoes and their inventors, page 18

^ Gray, Edwyn (2004). Nineteenth-Century Torpedoes and Their Inventors. Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-59114-341-3.

^ Seifer, Marc (24 October 2011). Life and Times of Nikola Tesla. Citadel. p. 1893. ISBN 978-0-8065-3556-2. Archived from the original on 5 December 2016.

^ Miessner, Benjamin Franklin (1916). Radiodynamics: The Wireless Control of Torpedoes and Other Mechanisms. D. Van Nostrand Company. p. 83.

^ US 613809, Tesla, Nikola, "Method of and apparatus for controlling mechanism of moving vessels or vehicles", published 1898-11-08 

^ "Tesla – Master of Lightning". PBS. Archived from the original on 28 September 2008. Retrieved 24 September 2008.

^ Sarkar 2006, page 97

^ Torres, Leonardo, "GB190327073 (A) ― Means or Method for Directing Mechanical Movements at or from a Distance.", Espacenet, 10 December 1903.

^ A. P. Yuste (January 2008). "Early Developments of Wireless Remote Control: The Telekino of Torres-Quevedo". Proceedings of the IEEE. 96 (1): 186–190. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2007.909931. S2CID 111010868.

^ "1902 – Telekine (Telekino) – Leonardo Torres Quevedo (Spanish)". 17 December 2010.

^ H. R. Everett (2015). Unmanned Systems of World Wars I and II. MIT Press. pp. 91–95. ISBN 978-0-262-02922-3.

^ "AH Reffell & Eric the Robot (1928) - the UK's Firs Robot". Retrieved 26 September 2023.

^ "1932 - George Robot - Capt. W.H. Richards (British)". cyberneticzoo.com. Retrieved 26 September 2023.

^ "Robot Dreams: The Strange Tale Of A Man's Quest To Rebuild His Mechanical Childhood Friend". The Cleveland Free Times. Archived from the original on 15 January 2010. Retrieved 25 September 2008.

^ Schaut, Scott (2006). Robots of Westinghouse: 1924-Today. Mansfield Memorial Museum. ISBN 978-0-9785844-1-2.

^ Secrets of the Flying Bomb Revealed: Special Sectional Drawing and How the Robot's Flight and Dive are Controlled Automatically. Illustrated London News. 1944.

^ Holland, Owen. "The Grey Walter Online Archive". Archived from the original on 9 October 2008. Retrieved 25 September 2008.

^ Waurzyniak, Patrick (July 2006). "Masters of Manufacturing: Joseph F. Engelberger". Society of Manufacturing Engineers. 137 (1). Archived from the original on 9 November 2011. Retrieved 25 September 2008.

^ "Robot Hall of Fame – Unimate". Carnegie Mellon University. Retrieved 26 September 2023.

^ "Company History". Fuji Yusoki Kogyo Co. Archived from the original on 4 February 2013. Retrieved 12 September 2008.

^ "KUKA Industrial Robot FAMULUS". Archived from the original on 10 June 2013. Retrieved 10 January 2008.

^ "History of Industrial Robots" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 December 2012. Retrieved 27 October 2012.

^ "History of Industrial Robots". robots.com. Archived from the original on 8 July 2015. Retrieved 24 August 2015.

^ "About us". Archived from the original on 9 January 2014.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)

^ "RoboHon: Cute little Robot cum Smartphone | Codexify". Archived from the original on 7 October 2015. Retrieved 6 October 2015.

^ Tesfaye, Mehret (13 August 2009). "Robots to get their own operating system". Ethiopian Review. Archived from the original on 18 September 2009.

^ Myoken, Yumiko (January 2009). Research and Development for Next-generation Service Robots in Japan (United Kingdom Foreign Ministry report). Science and Innovation Section, British Embassy, Tokyo, Japan. Archived from the original on 23 July 2012.

^ Dahiya, Ravinder S.; Valle, Maurizio (30 July 2012). Robotic Tactile Sensing – Technologies and System. Springer.com. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0579-1. ISBN 978-94-007-0578-4. Archived from the original on 29 December 2013. Retrieved 8 February 2014.

^ Dahiya, Ravinder S.; Metta, Giorgio; Cannata, Giorgio; Valle, Maurizio (2011). "Guest Editorial Special Issue on Robotic Sense of Touch". IEEE Transactions on Robotics. 27 (3): 385–388. doi:10.1109/TRO.2011.2155830. S2CID 18608163.

^ "Robotics in practice: Future capabilities"

by Joseph F. Engelberger.

in "Electronic Servicing & Technology" magazine 1982 August.

^ McKeough, Tim (1 December 2008). "The Caterpillar Self-Driving Dump Truck". Fast Company. Archived from the original on 7 June 2011.

^ Weiss, Richard (9 December 2014). "Self-Driving Trucks to Revolutionize Logistics, DHL Says". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on 22 July 2016.

^ Grayson, Wayne (16 October 2014). VIDEO: Why Caterpillar's autonomous mining tech is "completely different from anything" it's ever done. Archived from the original on 13 May 2016.

^ Takahashi, Kaori (23 April 2015). "Self-driving dump trucks, automatic shovels coming to Australian mines". Archived from the original on 9 May 2016.

^ Hall, Matthew (20 October 2014). "Forget self-driving Google cars, Australia has self-driving trucks". The Age. Archived from the original on 26 April 2016.

^ Clark, Charles (19 October 2015). "Australian mining giant Rio Tinto is using these huge self-driving trucks to transport iron ore". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 9 May 2016.

^ Berman, Dennis K. (23 July 2013). "Daddy, What Was a Truck Driver? Over the Next Two Decades, the Machines Themselves Will Take Over the Driving". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 4 March 2017.

^ "Robot can read, learn like a human". NBC News. 6 December 2010. Retrieved 10 December 2010.

^ Melik, James (3 January 2013). "Robots: Brave New World moves a step closer". Business Daily. BBC World Service. Archived from the original on 14 January 2019.

^ "Kitchen robot in Riga cooks up new future for fast food". techxplore.com. Retrieved 14 August 2021.

^ "Tech May Widen the Gap Between Rich and Poor". Futurism. Retrieved 23 August 2021.

^ "Indo-European root *orbh-". 12 May 2008. Archived from the original on 24 January 2009. Retrieved 8 February 2014.

^ "robot". Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved 26 September 2023.

^ "Hank Green's First Novel Is An Absolutely Remarkable Thing". Indianapolis Monthly. 1 October 2018. Retrieved 20 November 2019.

^ "You Are Pronouncing the Word "Robot" Wrong". Daily Kos. Retrieved 20 November 2019.

^ Ranger, Steve (20 December 2013). "Robots of death, robots of love: The reality of android soldiers and why laws for robots are doomed to failure". TechRepublic. Archived from the original on 27 January 2017. Retrieved 21 January 2017.

^ Moubarak, Paul M.; Ben-Tzvi, Pinhas (2011). "Adaptive manipulation of a Hybrid Mechanism Mobile Robot". 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Robotic and Sensors Environments (ROSE). pp. 113–118. doi:10.1109/ROSE.2011.6058520. ISBN 978-1-4577-0819-0. S2CID 8659998.

^ a b "Smart Caddy". Seegrid. Archived from the original on 11 October 2007. Retrieved 13 September 2007.

^ Zhang, Gexiang; Pérez-Jiménez, Mario J.; Gheorghe, Marian (5 April 2017). Real-life Applications with Membrane Computing. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-55989-6.

^ Kagan, E.; Shvalb, N.; Gal, I. (2019). Autonomous Mobile Robots and Multi-Robot Systems: Motion-Planning, Communication, and Swarming. John Wiley and Sons. ISBN 978-1-119-21286-7.PP 65-69.

^ Patic, Deepack; Ansari, Munsaf; Tendulkar, Dilisha; Bhatlekar, Ritesh; Naik, Vijaykumar; Shailendra, Pawar (2020). "A Survey On Autonomous Military Service Robot". 2020 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Information Technology and Engineering (Ic-ETITE). IEEE International Conference on Emerging Trends in Information Technology and Engineering. pp. 1–7. doi:10.1109/ic-ETITE47903.2020.78. ISBN 978-1-7281-4142-8. S2CID 216588335.

^ "Definition of a robot" (PDF). Dansk Robot Forening. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 June 2007. Retrieved 10 September 2007.

^ "Robotics-related Standards Sites". European Robotics Research Network. Archived from the original on 17 June 2006. Retrieved 15 July 2008.

^ "Service Robots". International Federation of Robotics. 27 October 2012. Archived from the original on 18 February 2010.

^ Mitgang, Lee (25 October 1983). "'Nova's' 'Talking Turtle' Pofiles High Priest of School Computer Movement". Gainesville Sun.

^ Barnard, Jeff (January 29, 1985). "Robots In School: Games Or Learning?". Observer-Reporter. Washington. Archived from the original on September 22, 2015. Retrieved March 7, 2012.

^ "Education: Marvel of the Bronx". Time. April 1974. Archived from the original on 24 May 2019. Retrieved 19 May 2019.

^ "Leachim Archives". cyberneticzoo.com. 13 September 2010. Archived from the original on 28 May 2019. Retrieved 29 May 2019.

^ P. Moubarak, et al., Modular and Reconfigurable Mobile Robotics, Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 60 (12) (2012) 1648–1663.

^ Rédaction (25 December 2011). "Le consortium franco-québécois Mix dévoile son projet de voiture volante" (in French). aerobuzz.fr. Archived from the original on 6 October 2012. Retrieved 7 September 2012.

^ Scanlan, Steve (September 2009). "Modularity in robotics provides automation for all". Electronic Products and Technology. Archived from the original on 5 July 2012. Retrieved 7 September 2012.

^ "Duct cleaning robots" (PDF). Robotics Design Inc. Plumbing & HVAC. April 2010. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 April 2013. Retrieved 29 April 2010.

^ "Universal Robots collaborate outside enclosures | Control Engineering". Controleng.com. February 2013. Archived from the original on 18 May 2013. Retrieved 4 June 2013.

^ Pittman, Kagan (19 May 2016). "INFOGRAPHIC: A Brief History of Collaborative Robots". Engineering.com. Archived from the original on 10 June 2016.

^ Hagerty, James (18 September 2012). "Baxter Robot Heads to Work'". The Wall Street Journal. New York. Archived from the original on 10 April 2015. Retrieved 29 May 2014.

^ Markoff, John (18 September 2012). "A Robot With a Reassuring Touch". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 19 September 2012. Retrieved 18 September 2012.

^ "A Ping-Pong-Playing Terminator". Popular Science. Archived from the original on 29 March 2011. Retrieved 18 December 2010.

^ "Best robot 2009". Neterion. Tech Magazine.

^ "Robots Today and Tomorrow: IFR Presents the 2007 World Robotics Statistics Survey". RobotWorx. 29 October 2007. Archived from the original on 5 February 2008. Retrieved 14 December 2007.

^ "Japan's robots slug it out to be world champ". Reuters. 2 December 2007. Archived from the original on 13 December 2007. Retrieved 1 January 2007.

^ a b Ho, C. C.; MacDorman, K. F.; Pramono, Z. A. D. (2008). Human emotion and the uncanny valley: A GLM, MDS, and ISOMAP analysis of robot video ratings (PDF). 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 September 2008. Retrieved 24 September 2008.

^ a b "AI Topics / Ethics". Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. Archived from the original on 5 August 2011.

^ "Robots can be racist and sexist, new study warns". TRT World. Retrieved 27 June 2022.

^ "News Index by Topic - ETHICAL & SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS Archive". Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. Archived from the original on 6 April 2012.

^ McNealy, Kristie (29 July 2009). "Scientists Predict Artificial Brain in 10 Years". Archived from the original on 29 November 2009.

^ Moravec, Hans (1999). Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendent Mind. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-513630-2. Archived from the original on 5 December 2016.

^ Weigand, Matthew (17 August 2009). "Robots Almost Conquering Walking, Reading, Dancing". Korea IT times. Archived from the original on 21 July 2011.

^ Schanze, Jens. "Plug & Pray". Archived from the original on 12 February 2016.

^ a b Markoff, John (26 July 2009). "Scientists Worry Machines May Outsmart Man". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 1 July 2017.

^ Vinge, Vernor (1993). "The Coming Technological Singularity: How to Survive in the Post-Human Era". Archived from the original on 1 January 2007.

^ Singer, P. W. (21 May 2009). "Gaming the Robot Revolution: A military technology expert weighs in on Terminator: Salvation". Slate. Archived from the original on 27 January 2010.

^ "Robot takeover". gyre.org. Archived from the original on 19 April 2012.

^ "Robotapocalypse". Engadget. Archived from the original on 4 May 2018.

^ Palmer, Jason (3 August 2009). "Call for debate on killer robots". BBC News. Archived from the original on 7 August 2009.

^ Axe, David (13 August 2009). "Robot three-way portends autonomous future". Wired. Archived from the original on 7 November 2012.

^ Mick, Jason (17 February 2009). "New Navy-funded Report Warns of War Robots Going "Terminator"". DailyTech. Archived from the original on 28 July 2009.

^ Flatley, Joseph L. (18 February 2009). "Navy report warns of robot uprising, suggests a strong moral compass". Engadget. Archived from the original on 4 June 2011.

^ Lamb, Gregory M. (17 February 2010). "New role for robot warriors". The Christian Science Monitor. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015.

^ "Biomass-Eating Military Robot Is a Vegetarian, Company Says". Fox News. 16 July 2009. Archived from the original on 3 August 2009. Retrieved 31 July 2009.

^ Shachtman, Noah (17 July 2009). "Danger Room What's Next in National Security Company Denies its Robots Feed on the Dead". Wired. Archived from the original on 29 July 2009. Retrieved 31 July 2009.

^ "Cyclone Power Technologies Responds to Rumors about "Flesh Eating" Military Robot" (PDF) (Press release). RTI Inc. 16 July 2009. pp. 1–2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 August 2009.

^ "Brief Project Overview, EATR: Energetically Autonomous Tactical Robot" (PDF). RTI Inc. 6 April 2009. p. 22.

^ Manuel de Landa, War in the Age of Intelligent Machines, New York: Zone Books, 1991, 280 pages, Hardcover, ISBN 0-942299-76-0; Paperback, ISBN 0-942299-75-2.

^ McGaughey, E (2022) [January 10, 2018]. "Will Robots Automate Your Job Away? Full Employment, Basic Income, and Economic Democracy". Industrial Law Journal. 51 (3). doi:10.2139/ssrn.3119589. SSRN 3119589.

^ Porter, Eduardo; Manjoo, Farhad (9 March 2016). "A Future Without Jobs? Two Views of the Changing Work Force". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 15 February 2017. Retrieved 23 February 2017.

^ Thompson, Derek (July–August 2015). "A World Without Work". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 27 February 2017. Retrieved 11 March 2017.

^ Yan (30 July 2011). "Foxconn to replace workers with 1 million robots in 3 years". Xinhua News Agency. Archived from the original on 8 October 2011. Retrieved 4 August 2011.

^ "Judgment day – employment law and robots in the workplace". futureofworkhub. 20 November 2014. Archived from the original on 3 April 2015. Retrieved 7 January 2015.

^ Delaney, Kevin (17 February 2017). "The robot that takes your job should pay taxes, says Bill Gates". Quartz. Archived from the original on 5 March 2017. Retrieved 4 March 2017.

^ "The Changing Nature of Work". Archived from the original on 30 September 2018. Retrieved 8 October 2018.

^ Talbot, Ben; Dayoub, Feras; Corke, Peter; Wyeth, Gordon (December 2021). "Robot Navigation in Unseen Spaces Using an Abstract Map". IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems. 13 (4): 791–805. arXiv:2001.11684. doi:10.1109/TCDS.2020.2993855. ISSN 2379-8939. S2CID 211004032.

^ "Contact Systems Pick and Place robots". Contact Systems. Archived from the original on 14 September 2008. Retrieved 21 September 2008.

^ "SMT pick-and-place equipment". Assembleon. Archived from the original on 3 August 2008. Retrieved 21 September 2008.

^ "The Basics of Automated Guided Vehicles". Savant Automation, AGV Systems. Archived from the original on 8 October 2007. Retrieved 13 September 2007.

^ "Automatic Trailer Loading Vehicle - SmartLoader". Archived from the original on 23 May 2013. Retrieved 2 September 2011.

^ "SpeciMinder". CSS Robotics. Archived from the original on 1 July 2009. Retrieved 25 September 2008.

^ "ADAM robot". RMT Robotics. Archived from the original on 17 May 2006. Retrieved 25 September 2008.

^ "Can Do". Aethon. Archived from the original on 3 August 2008. Retrieved 25 September 2008.

^ "Eskorta robot". Fennec Fox Technologies. Archived from the original on 6 December 2011. Retrieved 25 November 2011.

^ "Delivery Robots & AGVs". Mobile Robots. Archived from the original on 26 February 2010. Retrieved 25 September 2008.

^ "Dante II, list of published papers". The Robotics Institute of Carnegie Mellon University. Archived from the original on 15 May 2008. Retrieved 16 September 2007.

^ "Mars Pathfinder Mission: Rover Sojourner". NASA. 8 July 1997. Archived from the original on 1 February 2017. Retrieved 19 September 2007.

^ a b "Robot assisted surgery: da Vinci Surgical System". Brown University Division of Biology and Medicine. Archived from the original on 16 September 2007. Retrieved 19 September 2007.

^ "The Utilization of Robotic Space Probes in Deep Space Missions:Case Study of AI Protocols and Nuclear Power Requirements". Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Mechanical Engineering, Robotics and Aerospace. October 2011.

^ Foust, Jeff (16 January 2012). "Review: Space Probes". Archived from the original on 31 August 2012. Review of Space Probes: 50 Years of Exploration from Luna 1 to New Horizons, by Philippe Séguéla Firefly, 2011.

^ "Celebrities set to reach for Atwood's LongPen". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. 15 August 2007. Archived from the original on 22 May 2009. Retrieved 21 September 2008.

^ Graham, Stephen (12 June 2006). "America's robot army". New Statesman. Archived from the original on 17 February 2012. Retrieved 24 September 2007.

^ "Battlefield Robots: to Iraq, and Beyond". Defense Industry Daily. 20 June 2005. Archived from the original on 26 August 2007. Retrieved 24 September 2007.

^ Shachtman, Noah (November 2005). "The Baghdad Bomb Squad". Wired. Archived from the original on 22 April 2008. Retrieved 14 September 2007.

^ Shachtman, Noah (2 August 2007). "WIRED: First Armed Robots on Patrol in Iraq (Updated)". Wired. Retrieved 26 September 2023.

^ Shachtman, Noah (28 March 2013). "WIRED: Armed Robots Pushed To Police". Wired. Archived from the original on 12 April 2009. Retrieved 8 February 2014.

^ "America's Robot Army: Are Unmanned Fighters Ready for Combat?". Popular Mechanics. 17 December 2009. Retrieved 26 September 2023.

^ Hagerman, Eric (23 February 2010). "The Present and Future of Unmanned Drone Aircraft: An Illustrated Field Guide". Popular Science. Archived from the original on 26 February 2010.

^ Higgins, Kat (12 July 2010). "Taranis: The £143m Fighter Jet Of The Future". Sky News Online. Archived from the original on 15 July 2010. Retrieved 13 July 2010.

^ Emery, Daniel (12 July 2010). "MoD lifts lid on unmanned combat plane prototype". BBC News. Archived from the original on 12 July 2010. Retrieved 12 July 2010.

^ AAAI Presidential Panel on Long-Term AI Futures 2008–2009 Study (Report). Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. Archived from the original on 28 August 2009. Retrieved 26 July 2009.

^ "Why We Need Friendly AI". 3 Laws Unsafe. July 2004. Archived from the original on 24 May 2012. Retrieved 27 July 2009.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)

^ "Robotic age poses ethical dilemma". BBC News. 7 March 2007. Archived from the original on 15 February 2009. Retrieved 2 January 2007.

^ Christensen, Bill (26 May 2006). "Asimov's First Law: Japan Sets Rules for Robots". Live Science. Archived from the original on 13 October 2008.

^ "Japan drafts rules for advanced robots". UPI. 6 April 2007. Archived from the original on 11 October 2008 – via physorg.com.

^ "Building a Safe and Secure Social System Incorporating the Coexistence of Humans and Robots" (Press release). Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. March 2009. Archived from the original on 27 September 2011.

^ Weng, Yueh-Hsuan; Chen, Chien-Hsun; Sun, Chuen-Tsai (25 April 2009). "Toward the Human–Robot Co-Existence Society: On Safety Intelligence for Next Generation Robots". International Journal of Social Robotics. 1 (4): 267–282. doi:10.1007/s12369-009-0019-1. S2CID 36232530.

^ Fox, Stuart (19 August 2009). "Evolving Robots Learn To Lie To Each Other". Popular Science.

^ "Rio Tinto Media Center – Rio Tinto boosts driverless truck fleet to 150 under Mine of the Future™ programme". Riotinto.com. Archived from the original on 24 April 2013. Retrieved 8 February 2014.

^ "BHP Billiton hits go on autonomous drills". Retrieved 13 February 2023.

^ Adrian (6 September 2011). "AIMEX blog – Autonomous mining equipment". Adrianboeing.blogspot.com. Archived from the original on 18 December 2013. Retrieved 8 February 2014.

^ "Atlas Copco – RCS". Atlascopco.com. Archived from the original on 7 February 2014. Retrieved 8 February 2014.

^ "Transmin – Rocklogic". Rocklogic.com.au. Archived from the original on 25 January 2014. Retrieved 8 February 2014.

^ Topping, Mike; Smith, Jane (1999). "An Overview Of Handy 1, A Rehabilitation Robot For The Severely Disabled". CSUN Center on Disabilities Conference Proceedings. 1999. Proceedings: Session 59. Archived from the original on 5 August 2009. Retrieved 14 August 2010. The early version of the Handy 1 system consisted of a Cyber 310 robotic arm with five degrees of freedom plus a gripper.

^ Jeavans, Christine (29 November 2004). "Welcome to the ageing future". BBC News. Archived from the original on 16 October 2007. Retrieved 26 September 2007.

^ "Statistical Handbook of Japan: Chapter 2 Population". Statistics Bureau & Statistical Research and Training Institute. Archived from the original on 6 September 2013. Retrieved 26 September 2007.

^ "Robotic future of patient care". E-Health Insider. 16 August 2007. Archived from the original on 21 November 2007. Retrieved 26 September 2007.

^ Gebhart, Fred (4 July 2019). "The Future of Pharmacy Automation". Drug Topics Journal. Drug Topics July 2019. 163 (7). Retrieved 16 October 2022.

^ Dolan, Kerry A. "R2D2 Has Your Pills". Forbes. Retrieved 20 November 2019.

^ "Nanobots Play Football". Techbirbal. Archived from the original on 3 April 2013. Retrieved 8 February 2014.

^ "KurzweilAI.net". 21 June 2010. Archived from the original on 21 June 2010. Retrieved 5 July 2016.

^ "(Eric Drexler 1986) Engines of Creation, The Coming Era of Nanotechnology". E-drexler.com. Archived from the original on 6 September 2014. Retrieved 8 February 2014.

^ Phoenix, Chris (December 2003). "Of Chemistry, Nanobots, and Policy". Center for Responsible Nanotechnology. Archived from the original on 11 October 2007. Retrieved 28 October 2007.

^ "Nanotechnology pioneer slays 'grey goo' myths". ScienceDaily. 9 June 2004.

^ Toth-Fejel, Tihamer (May 1996). LEGO(TM)s to the Stars: Active MesoStructures, Kinetic Cellular Automata, and Parallel Nanomachines for Space Applications. 1996 International Space Development Conference. New York City. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007.

^ Fitch, Robert; Butler, Zack; Rus, Daniela. "Reconfiguration Planning for Heterogeneous Self-Reconfiguring Robots" (PDF). Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 June 2007.

^ "Researchers build robot scientist that has already discovered a new catalyst". phys.org. Retrieved 16 August 2020.

^ Burger, Benjamin; Maffettone, Phillip M.; Gusev, Vladimir V.; Aitchison, Catherine M.; Bai, Yang; Wang, Xiaoyan; Li, Xiaobo; Alston, Ben M.; Li, Buyi; Clowes, Rob; Rankin, Nicola; Harris, Brandon; Sprick, Reiner Sebastian; Cooper, Andrew I. (July 2020). "A mobile robotic chemist". Nature. 583 (7815): 237–241. Bibcode:2020Natur.583..237B. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2442-2. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 32641813. S2CID 220420261. Retrieved 16 August 2020.

^ Schwartz, John (27 March 2007). "In the Lab: Robots That Slink and Squirm". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 3 April 2015. Retrieved 22 September 2008.

^ Eschner, Kat (25 March 2019). "Squishy robots now have squishy computers to control them". Popular Science.

^ "The softer side of robotics". May 2019. Retrieved 13 February 2023.

^ "SRI/MobileRobots". activrobots.com. Archived from the original on 12 February 2009.

^ "Open-source micro-robotic project". Archived from the original on 11 November 2007. Retrieved 28 October 2007.

^ "Swarm". iRobot Corporation. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 28 October 2007.

^ Knapp, Louise (21 December 2000). "Look, Up in the Sky: Robofly". Wired. Archived from the original on 26 June 2012. Retrieved 25 September 2008.

^ "The Cutting Edge of Haptics". MIT Technology review. Retrieved 25 September 2008.

^ "Artists & Robots Exposition au Grand Palais du 5 avril au 9 juillet 2018". 14 August 2019. Archived from the original on 14 August 2019. Retrieved 3 February 2020.

^ "Comic Potential: Q&A with Director Stephen Cole". Cornell University. Archived from the original on 3 January 2009. Retrieved 21 November 2007.

^ Freedman, Carl, ed. (2005). Conversations with Isaac Asimov (1. ed.). Jackson: Univ. Press of Mississippi. p. vii. ISBN 978-1-57806-738-1. Retrieved 4 August 2011. ... quite possibly the most prolific

^ Oakes, Elizabeth H. (2004). American writers. New York: Facts on File. p. 24. ISBN 978-0-8160-5158-8. Retrieved 4 August 2011. most prolific authors asimov.

^ He wrote "over 460 books as well as thousands of articles and reviews", and was the "third most prolific writer of all time [and] one of the founding fathers of modern science fiction". White, Michael (2005). Isaac Asimov: a life of the grand master of science fiction. Carroll & Graf. pp. 1–2. ISBN 978-0-7867-1518-3. Archived from the original on 5 December 2016. Retrieved 25 September 2016.

^ R. Clarke. "Asimov's Laws of Robotics – Implications for Information Technology". Australian National University/IEEE. Archived from the original on 22 July 2008. Retrieved 25 September 2008.

^ Seiler, Edward; Jenkins, John H. (27 June 2008). "Isaac Asimov FAQ". Isaac Asimov Home Page. Archived from the original on 16 July 2012. Retrieved 24 September 2008.

^ White, Michael (2005). Isaac Asimov: A Life of the Grand Master of Science Fiction. Carroll & Graf. p. 56. ISBN 978-0-7867-1518-3.

^ "Intelligent machines: Call for a ban on robots designed as sex toys". BBC News. 15 September 2015. Archived from the original on 30 June 2018. Retrieved 21 June 2018.

^ Abdollahi, Hojjat; Mollahosseini, Ali; Lane, Josh T.; Mahoor, Mohammad H. (November 2017). A pilot study on using an intelligent life-like robot as a companion for elderly individuals with dementia and depression. 2017 IEEE-RAS 17th International Conference on Humanoid Robotics (Humanoids). pp. 541–546. arXiv:1712.02881. Bibcode:2017arXiv171202881A. doi:10.1109/humanoids.2017.8246925. ISBN 978-1-5386-4678-6. S2CID 1962455.

External links

Wikiquote has quotations related to Robot.

Robotics at Curlie

Journal of Field Robotics

vteRoboticsMain articles

Outline

Glossary

Index

History

Geography

Hall of Fame

Ethics

Laws

Competitions

AI competitions

Types

Aerobot

Anthropomorphic

Humanoid

Android

Cyborg

Gynoid

Claytronics

Companion

Automaton

Animatronic

Audio-Animatronics

Industrial

Articulated

arm

Domestic

Educational

Entertainment

Juggling

Military

Medical

Service

Disability

Agricultural

Food service

Retail

BEAM robotics

Soft robotics

Classifications

Biorobotics

Cloud robotics

Continuum robot

Unmanned vehicle

aerial

ground

Mobile robot

Microbotics

Nanorobotics

Necrobotics

Robotic spacecraft

Space probe

Swarm

Telerobotics

Underwater

remotely-operated

Robotic fish

Locomotion

Tracks

Walking

Hexapod

Climbing

Electric unicycle

Robotic fins

Navigation and mapping

Motion planning

Simultaneous localization and mapping

Visual odometry

Vision-guided robot systems

Research

Evolutionary

Kits

Simulator

Suite

Open-source

Software

Adaptable

Developmental

Human–robot interaction

Paradigms

Perceptual

Situated

Ubiquitous

Companies

Amazon Robotics

Anybots

Barrett Technology

Boston Dynamics

Energid Technologies

FarmWise

FANUC

Foster-Miller

Harvest Automation

Honeybee Robotics

Intuitive Surgical

IRobot

KUKA

Starship Technologies

Symbotic

Universal Robotics

Wolf Robotics

Yaskawa

Related

Critique of work

Powered exoskeleton

Workplace robotics safety

Robotic tech vest

Technological unemployment

Terrainability

Fictional robots

Category

Outline

vteMachinesClassical simple machines

Inclined plane

Lever

Pulley

Screw

Wedge

Wheel and axle

Clocks

Atomic clock

Chronometer

Pendulum clock

Quartz clock

Compressors and pumps

Archimedes' screw

Eductor-jet pump

Hydraulic ram

Pump

Trompe

Vacuum pump

External combustion engines

Steam engine

Stirling engine

Internal combustion engines

Gas turbine

Reciprocating engine

Rotary engine

Nutating disc engine

Linkages

Pantograph

Peaucellier-Lipkin

Turbine

Gas turbine

Jet engine

Quasiturbine

Steam turbine

Water turbine

Wind generator

Windmill

Aerofoil

Sail

Wing

Rudder

Flap

Propeller

Electronics

Vacuum tube

Transistor

Diode

Resistor

Capacitor

Inductor

Vehicles

Automobile

Miscellaneous

Mecha

Robot

Agricultural

Seed-counting machine

Vending machine

Wind tunnel

Check weighing machines

Riveting machines

Springs

Spring (device)

vteScience fictionOutline

Authors

Definitions

Anthropological

Hard

Scientific romance

Soft

Golden Age

History

New Wave

Timeline

Subgenres

Apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic

Comedy

Sitcoms

Feminist

Grimdark

Inner space

Mecha

Anime and manga

Mundane

Space warfare

Military

Space opera

Space Western

Parallel universes

Isekai

Science fantasy

Dying Earth

Planetary romance

Superhero

Sword and planet

Social

Climate fiction

Christian

Libertarian

Utopian and dystopian

Tech noir

Spy-Fi

Techno-thriller

Tokusatsu

Kaiju

Underwater

Cyberpunk derivatives

Cyberpunk

Japanese

Biopunk

Dieselpunk

Nanopunk

Solarpunk

Steampunk

Culture

Conventions

Fandom

Fanzines

Libraries and museums

ISFDB

Science Fiction Museum

Studies

Women in SF

Worldcon

Region

Australian

Bengali

Brazilian

Canadian

Chilean

Chinese

Croatian

Czech

Estonian

French

Hungarian

Japanese

Norwegian

Polish

Romanian

Russian

Serbian

Spanish

Yugoslav

AwardsCinematic

Jules Verne

Saturn

Literary, art,and audio

Astounding

Aurealis

BSFA

Campbell Memorial

Chesley

Clarke

Crook

Deutscher

Dick

Ditmar

Endeavor

FantLab

Galaxy

Gaughan

Geffen

Golden Duck

Grand Master

Grand Prix

Harland

Heinlein

Ignotus

Kitschies

Lambda

Laßwitz

Locus

Nautilus

Nebula

Nommo

Norton

Parsec

Prometheus

Rhysling

SFERA

Sidewise

Skylark

Sturgeon

Sunburst

Tähtivaeltaja

TBD

Tiptree

Tour-Apollo

Translation

Urania

Vogel

Writers and Illustrators of the Future

Zajdel

Multimedia

Aurora

Chandler

Dragon

Hugo

Seiun

Spectrum

MediaFilm

Film history

Films

Indian

Japanese

Anime

Tokusatsu

Literature

Comics

Magazines

Novels

Publishers

Short stories

Stage

Opera

Theatre

Television

List of TV shows

Australasian

British

Canadian

European

Japanese

Anime

Live-action

U.S.

ThemesArchitectural

Colonization

Dyson sphere

Matrioshka brain

Space stations and habitats

Stellar engine

Terraforming

Biological

Biological warfare

Energy being

Evolution

Extraterrestrials

List

Gender

Genetic engineering

Invisibility

Nanotechnology

Organ transplantation

Parasites

Prosthetics

Sex and sexuality

Symbiosis

Physical

Ansible

Black holes

Force field

Hyperspace

Inertialess

Multiverse

Parallel universes

Planets

Earth

Portable hole

Space travel

Stargate

Stars and planetary systems

Teleportation

Time travel (Viewer)

Warp drive

Wormhole

Psychological

Group mind

Mind uploading

Psionics

Simulated consciousness

Social

Africanfuturism

Afrofuturism

Alien invasion

Alien language

Ancient astronauts

Black

Evil corporation

First contact

Frankenstein complex

Galactic empire

LGBT

Message from space

Political ideas

Transhumanism

Uplifting

World government

Xenoarchaeology

Technological

Artificial intelligence

AI takeover

Astroengineering

Holography

Robots and Cyborgs

Self-replicating machines

Spacecraft

Tachyons

Weapons

Related

Alternate history

Fantasy

Fictional astronauts

Fictional technology

Future history

Horror

Magic realism

Museum of Science Fiction

Rubber science

Science and technology studies

Sense of wonder

Speculative fiction

Supernatural

Technology and society

Weird

Category Portal

Robot at Wikipedia's sister projects:Definitions from WiktionaryMedia from CommonsTextbooks from WikibooksResources from Wikiversity

Authority control databases: National

France

BnF data

Germany

Israel

United States

2

Japan

Czech Republic

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robot&oldid=1211103952"

Categories: RoboticsRobotsCzech words and phrasesScience in popular culture1920s neologismsHidden categories: CS1 maint: unfit URLCS1 French-language sources (fr)CS1: long volume valueArticles with short descriptionShort description is different from WikidataWikipedia indefinitely semi-protected pagesUse dmy dates from May 2021Wikipedia articles in need of updating from August 2021All Wikipedia articles in need of updatingArticles containing Czech-language textArticles containing Latin-language textArticles containing Hungarian-language textArticles containing undetermined-language textArticles containing Church Slavonic-language textArticles containing Proto-Indo-European-language textArticles containing explicitly cited English-language textArticles containing German-language textAll articles lacking reliable referencesArticles lacking reliable references from November 2019Articles containing potentially dated statements from May 2014All articles containing potentially dated statementsArticles needing additional references from July 2009All articles needing additional referencesAll articles with unsourced statementsArticles with unsourced statements from July 2009Articles with Curlie linksPages using Sister project links with wikidata mismatchArticles with BNF identifiersArticles with BNFdata identifiersArticles with GND identifiersArticles with J9U identifiersArticles with LCCN identifiersArticles with NDL identifiersArticles with NKC identifiers

This page was last edited on 29 February 2024, at 21:50 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0;

additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view

Toggle limited content width

Robot | Definition, History, Uses, Types, & Facts | Britannica

Robot | Definition, History, Uses, Types, & Facts | Britannica

Search Britannica

Click here to search

Search Britannica

Click here to search

Login

Subscribe

Subscribe

Home

Games & Quizzes

History & Society

Science & Tech

Biographies

Animals & Nature

Geography & Travel

Arts & Culture

Money

Videos

On This Day

One Good Fact

Dictionary

New Articles

History & Society

Lifestyles & Social Issues

Philosophy & Religion

Politics, Law & Government

World History

Science & Tech

Health & Medicine

Science

Technology

Biographies

Browse Biographies

Animals & Nature

Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates

Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates

Environment

Fossils & Geologic Time

Mammals

Plants

Geography & Travel

Geography & Travel

Arts & Culture

Entertainment & Pop Culture

Literature

Sports & Recreation

Visual Arts

Companions

Demystified

Image Galleries

Infographics

Lists

Podcasts

Spotlights

Summaries

The Forum

Top Questions

#WTFact

100 Women

Britannica Kids

Saving Earth

Space Next 50

Student Center

Home

Games & Quizzes

History & Society

Science & Tech

Biographies

Animals & Nature

Geography & Travel

Arts & Culture

Money

Videos

robot

Table of Contents

robot

Table of Contents

IntroductionIndustrial robotsRobot toysRobotics researchThe future

References & Edit History

Related Topics

Images & Videos

For Students

robot summary

Discover

7 Famous Child Prodigies

7 Puzzling Plane Disappearances

What Is the “Ides” of March?

12 Greek Gods and Goddesses

How Did Alexander the Great Really Die?

What’s the Difference Between Bison and Buffalo?

The Seven Sacraments of the Roman Catholic church

Home

Technology

Engineering

Mechanical Engineering

Science & Tech

robot

technology

Actions

Cite

verifiedCite

While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies.

Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.

Select Citation Style

MLA

APA

Chicago Manual of Style

Copy Citation

Share

Share

Share to social media

Facebook

Twitter

URL

https://www.britannica.com/technology/robot-technology

Give Feedback

External Websites

Feedback

Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login).

Feedback Type

Select a type (Required)

Factual Correction

Spelling/Grammar Correction

Link Correction

Additional Information

Other

Your Feedback

Submit Feedback

Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

External Websites

The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction - Robot

Britannica Websites

Articles from Britannica Encyclopedias for elementary and high school students.

robot - Children's Encyclopedia (Ages 8-11)

robot - Student Encyclopedia (Ages 11 and up)

Print

print

Print

Please select which sections you would like to print:

Table Of Contents

Cite

verifiedCite

While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies.

Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.

Select Citation Style

MLA

APA

Chicago Manual of Style

Copy Citation

Share

Share

Share to social media

Facebook

Twitter

URL

https://www.britannica.com/technology/robot-technology

Feedback

External Websites

Feedback

Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login).

Feedback Type

Select a type (Required)

Factual Correction

Spelling/Grammar Correction

Link Correction

Additional Information

Other

Your Feedback

Submit Feedback

Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

External Websites

The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction - Robot

Britannica Websites

Articles from Britannica Encyclopedias for elementary and high school students.

robot - Children's Encyclopedia (Ages 8-11)

robot - Student Encyclopedia (Ages 11 and up)

Written by

Hans Peter Moravec

Principal research scientist, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania. Author of Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendent Mind.

Hans Peter Moravec

Fact-checked by

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica

Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree. They write new content and verify and edit content received from contributors.

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica

Last Updated:

Feb 29, 2024

Article History

Table of Contents

humanoid robot

See all media

Category:

Science & Tech

Key People:

Rodney Brooks

(Show more)

Related Topics:

rehabilitation robot

three laws of robotics

android

mechanical manipulator

AIBO

(Show more)

See all related content →

Recent News

Feb. 29, 2024, 5:22 PM ET (AP)

Humanoid robot-maker Figure partners with OpenAI and gets backing from Jeff Bezos and tech giants

robot, any automatically operated machine that replaces human effort, though it may not resemble human beings in appearance or perform functions in a humanlike manner. By extension, robotics is the engineering discipline dealing with the design, construction, and operation of robots.Alfred Abel, Brigitte Helm, and Rudolf Klein-Rogge in Metropolis(From left) Alfred Abel, Brigitte Helm, and Rudolf Klein-Rogge in Metropolis, directed by Fritz Lang, 1927.(more)The concept of artificial humans predates recorded history (see automaton), but the modern term robot derives from the Czech word robota (“forced labour” or “serf”), used in Karel Čapek’s play R.U.R. (1920). The play’s robots were manufactured humans, heartlessly exploited by factory owners until they revolted and ultimately destroyed humanity. Whether they were biological, like the monster in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818), or mechanical was not specified, but the mechanical alternative inspired generations of inventors to build electrical humanoids.Learn about Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of RoboticsA discussion of Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics.(more)See all videos for this articleThe word robotics first appeared in Isaac Asimov’s science-fiction story Runaround (1942). Along with Asimov’s later robot stories, it set a new standard of plausibility about the likely difficulty of developing intelligent robots and the technical and social problems that might result. Runaround also contained Asimov’s famous Three Laws of Robotics:1. A robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.In 1970, Japanese roboticist Masahiro Mori proposed that as human likeness increases in an object’s design, so does one’s affinity for the object, giving rise to the phenomenon called the "uncanny valley." According to this theory, when the artificial likeness nears total accuracy, affinity drops dramatically and is replaced by a feeling of eeriness or uncanniness. Affinity then rises again when true human likeness—resembling a living person—is reached. This sudden decrease and increase caused by the feeling of uncanniness creates a “valley” in the level of affinity. This article traces the development of robots and robotics. For further information on industrial applications, see the article automation. (Read Toby Walsh’s Britannica essay on killer robots.)

Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content.

Subscribe Now

Industrial robots industrial robotIndustrial robot at a factory.(more)See how mechatronics help engineers create high-tech products such as industrial robotsLearn how the discipline of mechatronics combines knowledge and skills from mechanical, electrical, and computer engineering to create high-tech products such as industrial robots.(more)See all videos for this articleThough not humanoid in form, machines with flexible behaviour and a few humanlike physical attributes have been developed for industry. The first stationary industrial robot was the programmable Unimate, an electronically controlled hydraulic heavy-lifting arm that could repeat arbitrary sequences of motions. It was invented in 1954 by the American engineer George Devol and was developed by Unimation Inc., a company founded in 1956 by American engineer Joseph Engelberger. In 1959 a prototype of the Unimate was introduced in a General Motors Corporation die-casting factory in Trenton, New Jersey. In 1961 Condec Corp. (after purchasing Unimation the preceding year) delivered the world’s first production-line robot to the GM factory; it had the unsavoury task (for humans) of removing and stacking hot metal parts from a die-casting machine. Unimate arms continue to be developed and sold by licensees around the world, with the automobile industry remaining the largest buyer. (Read Sherry Turkle’s Britannica essay on robots.) See how use of a robotic pipeline for bacterial genetics makes the work of scientists less complicated and more time-efficient at University College CorkA “robotic pipeline” used in bacterial genetics at University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.(more)See all videos for this articleMore advanced computer-controlled electric arms guided by sensors were developed in the late 1960s and 1970s at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and at Stanford University, where they were used with cameras in robotic hand-eye research. Stanford’s Victor Scheinman, working with Unimation for GM, designed the first such arm used in industry. Called PUMA (Programmable Universal Machine for Assembly), they have been used since 1978 to assemble automobile subcomponents such as dash panels and lights. PUMA was widely imitated, and its descendants, large and small, are still used for light assembly in electronics and other industries. Since the 1990s small electric arms have become important in molecular biology laboratories, precisely handling test-tube arrays and pipetting intricate sequences of reagents. Mobile industrial robots also first appeared in 1954. In that year a driverless electric cart, made by Barrett Electronics Corporation, began pulling loads around a South Carolina grocery warehouse. Such machines, dubbed AGVs (Automatic Guided Vehicles), commonly navigate by following signal-emitting wires entrenched in concrete floors. In the 1980s AGVs acquired microprocessor controllers that allowed more complex behaviours than those afforded by simple electronic controls. In the 1990s a new navigation method became popular for use in warehouses: AGVs equipped with a scanning laser triangulate their position by measuring reflections from fixed retro-reflectors (at least three of which must be visible from any location). Although industrial robots first appeared in the United States, the business did not thrive there. Unimation was acquired by Westinghouse Electric Corporation in 1983 and shut down a few years later. Cincinnati Milacron, Inc., the other major American hydraulic-arm manufacturer, sold its robotics division in 1990 to the Swedish firm of Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. Adept Technology, Inc., spun off from Stanford and Unimation to make electric arms, is the only remaining American firm. Foreign licensees of Unimation, notably in Japan and Sweden, continue to operate, and in the 1980s other companies in Japan and Europe began to vigorously enter the field. The prospect of an aging population and consequent worker shortage induced Japanese manufacturers to experiment with advanced automation even before it gave a clear return, opening a market for robot makers. By the late 1980s Japan—led by the robotics divisions of Fanuc Ltd., Matsushita Electric Industrial Company, Ltd., Mitsubishi Group, and Honda Motor Company, Ltd.—was the world leader in the manufacture and use of industrial robots. High labour costs in Europe similarly encouraged the adoption of robot substitutes, with industrial robot installations in the European Union exceeding Japanese installations for the first time in 2001.

Robot toys entertainment robotAIBO entertainment robot, model ERS-111.(more)Lack of reliable functionality has limited the market for industrial and service robots (built to work in office and home environments). Toy robots, on the other hand, can entertain without performing tasks very reliably, and mechanical varieties have existed for thousands of years. (See automaton.) In the 1980s microprocessor-controlled toys appeared that could speak or move in response to sounds or light. More advanced ones in the 1990s recognized voices and words. In 1999 the Sony Corporation introduced a doglike robot named AIBO, with two dozen motors to activate its legs, head, and tail, two microphones, and a colour camera all coordinated by a powerful microprocessor. More lifelike than anything before, AIBOs chased coloured balls and learned to recognize their owners and to explore and adapt. Although the first AIBOs cost $2,500, the initial run of 5,000 sold out immediately over the Internet.

The Complete History And Future of Robots | WIRED

Complete History And Future of Robots | WIREDSkip to main contentOpen Navigation MenuMenuStory SavedTo revisit this article, visit My Profile, then View saved stories.Close AlertThe WIRED Guide to RobotsSecurityPoliticsGearBackchannelBusinessScienceCultureIdeasMerchMoreChevronStory SavedTo revisit this article, visit My Profile, then View saved stories.Close AlertSign InSearchSearchSecurityPoliticsGearBackchannelBusinessScienceCultureIdeasMerchPodcastsVideoWired WorldArtificial IntelligenceClimateGamesNewslettersMagazineEventsWired InsiderJobsCouponsMatt SimonScienceApr 16, 2020 9:00 AMThe WIRED Guide to RobotsEverything you wanted to know about soft, hard, and nonmurderous automatons.Play/Pause ButtonPauseRadioSave this storySaveSave this storySaveModern robots are not unlike toddlers: It’s hilarious to watch them fall over, but deep down we know that if we laugh too hard, they might develop a complex and grow up to start World War III. None of humanity’s creations inspires such a confusing mix of awe, admiration, and fear: We want robots to make our lives easier and safer, yet we can’t quite bring ourselves to trust them. We’re crafting them in our own image, yet we are terrified they’ll supplant us.But that trepidation is no obstacle to the booming field of robotics. Robots have finally grown smart enough and physically capable enough to make their way out of factories and labs to walk and roll and even leap among us. The machines have arrived.You may be worried a robot is going to steal your job, and we get that. This is capitalism, after all, and automation is inevitable. But you may be more likely to work alongside a robot in the near future than have one replace you. And even better news: You’re more likely to make friends with a robot than have one murder you. Hooray for the future!The History of RobotsThe definition of “robot” has been confusing from the very beginning. The word first appeared in 1921, in Karel Capek’s play R.U.R., or Rossum's Universal Robots. “Robot” comes from the Czech for “forced labor.” These robots were robots more in spirit than form, though. They looked like humans, and instead of being made of metal, they were made of chemical batter. The robots were far more efficient than their human counterparts, and also way more murder-y—they ended up going on a killing spree.R.U.R. would establish the trope of the Not-to-Be-Trusted Machine (e.g., Terminator, The Stepford Wives, Blade Runner, etc.) that continues to this day—which is not to say pop culture hasn’t embraced friendlier robots. Think Rosie from The Jetsons. (Ornery, sure, but certainly not homicidal.) And it doesn’t get much family-friendlier than Robin Williams as Bicentennial Man.The real-world definition of “robot” is just as slippery as those fictional depictions. Ask 10 roboticists and you’ll get 10 answers—how autonomous does it need to be, for instance. But they do agree on some general guidelines: A robot is an intelligent, physically embodied machine. A robot can perform tasks autonomously to some degree. And a robot can sense and manipulate its environment.Robo-cabularyHuman-robot interactionA field of robotics that studies the relationship between people and machines. For example, a self-driving car could see a stop sign and hit the brakes at the last minute, but that would terrify pedestrians and passengers alike. By studying human-robot interaction, roboticists can shape a world in which people and machines get along without hurting each other.HumanoidThe classical sci-fi robot. This is perhaps the most challenging form of robot to engineer, on account of it being both technically difficult and energetically costly to walk and balance on two legs. But humanoids may hold promise in rescue operations, where they’d be able to better navigate an environment designed for humans, like a nuclear reactor.ActuatorTypically, a combination of an electric motor and a gearbox. Actuators are what power most robots.Soft roboticsA field of robotics that foregoes traditional materials and motors in favor of generally softer materials and pumping air or oil to move its parts.LidarLidar, or light detection and ranging, is a system that blasts a robot’s surroundings with lasers to build a 3-D map. This is pivotal both for self-driving cars and for service robots that need to work with humans without running them down.SingularityThe hypothetical point where the machines grow so advanced that humans are forced into a societal and existential crisis.MultiplicityThe idea that robots and AI won’t supplant humans, but complement them.Think of a simple drone that you pilot around. That’s no robot. But give a drone the power to take off and land on its own and sense objects and suddenly it’s a lot more robot-ish. It’s the intelligence and sensing and autonomy that’s key.But it wasn’t until the 1960s that a company built something that started meeting those guidelines. That’s when SRI International in Silicon Valley developed Shakey, the first truly mobile and perceptive robot. This tower on wheels was well-named—awkward, slow, twitchy. Equipped with a camera and bump sensors, Shakey could navigate a complex environment. It wasn’t a particularly confident-looking machine, but it was the beginning of the robotic revolution.Around the time Shakey was trembling about, robot arms were beginning to transform manufacturing. The first among them was Unimate, which welded auto bodies. Today, its descendants rule car factories, performing tedious, dangerous tasks with far more precision and speed than any human could muster. Even though they’re stuck in place, they still very much fit our definition of a robot—they’re intelligent machines that sense and manipulate their environment.Robots, though, remained largely confined to factories and labs, where they either rolled about or were stuck in place lifting objects. Then, in the mid-1980s Honda started up a humanoid robotics program. It developed P3, which could walk pretty darn good and also wave and shake hands, much to the delight of a roomful of suits. The work would culminate in Asimo, the famed biped, which once tried to take out President Obama with a well-kicked soccer ball. (OK, perhaps it was more innocent than that.)Today, advanced robots are popping up everywhere. For that you can thank three technologies in particular: sensors, actuators, and AI.So, sensors. Machines that roll on sidewalks to deliver falafel can only navigate our world thanks in large part to the 2004 Darpa Grand Challenge, in which teams of roboticists cobbled together self-driving cars to race through the desert. Their secret? Lidar, which shoots out lasers to build a 3-D map of the world. The ensuing private-sector race to develop self-driving cars has dramatically driven down the price of lidar, to the point that engineers can create perceptive robots on the (relative) cheap.Most PopularPoliticsThe Kate Middleton Photo Controversy Is an Inexplicable MessBrian BarrettScienceSolar-Powered Farming Is Quickly Depleting the World's Groundwater SupplyFred PearceSecurityAirbnb Bans All Indoor Security CamerasAmanda HooverScienceStumped by Heat Pumps?Rhett AllainLidar is often combined with something called machine vision—2-D or 3-D cameras that allow the robot to build an even better picture of its world. You know how Facebook automatically recognizes your mug and tags you in pictures? Same principle with robots. Fancy algorithms allow them to pick out certain landmarks or objects.Sensors are what keep robots from smashing into things. They’re why a robot mule of sorts can keep an eye on you, following you and schlepping your stuff around; machine vision also allows robots to scan cherry trees to determine where best to shake them , helping fill massive labor gaps in agriculture.New technologies promise to let robots sense the world in ways that are far beyond humans’ capabilities. We’re talking about seeing around corners: At MIT, researchers have developed a system that watches the floor at the corner of, say, a hallway, and picks out subtle movements being reflected from the other side that the piddling human eye can’t see. Such technology could one day ensure that robots don’t crash into humans in labyrinthine buildings, and even allow self-driving cars to see occluded scenes.Within each of these robots is the next secret ingredient: the actuator, which is a fancy word for the combo electric motor and gearbox that you’ll find in a robot’s joint. It’s this actuator that determines how strong a robot is and how smoothly or not smoothly it moves. Without actuators, robots would crumple like rag dolls. Even relatively simple robots like Roombas owe their existence to actuators. Self-driving cars, too, are loaded with the things.Actuators are great for powering massive robot arms on a car assembly line, but a newish field, known as soft robotics, is devoted to creating actuators that operate on a whole new level. Unlike mule robots, soft robots are generally squishy, and use air or oil to get themselves moving. So for instance, one particular kind of robot muscle uses electrodes to squeeze a pouch of oil, expanding and contracting to tug on weights. Unlike with bulky traditional actuators, you could stack a bunch of these to magnify the strength: A robot named Kengoro, for instance, moves with 116 actuators that tug on cables, allowing the machine to do unsettlingly human maneuvers like pushups. It’s a far more natural-looking form of movement than what you’d get with traditional electric motors housed in the joints.And then there’s Boston Dynamics, which created the Atlas humanoid robot for the Darpa Robotics Challenge in 2013. At first, university robotics research teams struggled to get the machine to tackle the basic tasks of the original 2013 challenge and the finals round in 2015, like turning valves and opening doors. But Boston Dynamics has since that time turned Atlas into a marvel that can do backflips, far outpacing other bipeds that still have a hard time walking. (Unlike the Terminator, though, it does not pack heat.) Boston Dynamics has also begun leasing a quadruped robot called Spot, which can recover in unsettling fashion when humans kick or tug on it. That kind of stability will be key if we want to build a world where we don’t spend all our time helping robots out of jams. And it’s all thanks to the humble actuator.Most PopularPoliticsThe Kate Middleton Photo Controversy Is an Inexplicable MessBrian BarrettScienceSolar-Powered Farming Is Quickly Depleting the World's Groundwater SupplyFred PearceSecurityAirbnb Bans All Indoor Security CamerasAmanda HooverScienceStumped by Heat Pumps?Rhett AllainAt the same time that robots like Atlas and Spot are getting more physically robust, they’re getting smarter, thanks to AI. Robotics seems to be reaching an inflection point, where processing power and artificial intelligence are combining to truly ensmarten the machines. And for the machines, just as in humans, the senses and intelligence are inseparable—if you pick up a fake apple and don’t realize it’s plastic before shoving it in your mouth, you’re not very smart.This is a fascinating frontier in robotics (replicating the sense of touch, not eating fake apples). A company called SynTouch, for instance, has developed robotic fingertips that can detect a range of sensations, from temperature to coarseness. Another robot fingertip from Columbia University replicates touch with light, so in a sense it sees touch: It’s embedded with 32 photodiodes and 30 LEDs, overlaid with a skin of silicone. When that skin is deformed, the photodiodes detect how light from the LEDs changes to pinpoint where exactly you touched the fingertip, and how hard.Far from the hulking dullards that lift car doors on automotive assembly lines, the robots of tomorrow will be very sensitive indeed.The Future of RobotsIncreasingly sophisticated machines may populate our world, but for robots to be really useful, they’ll have to become more self-sufficient. After all, it would be impossible to program a home robot with the instructions for gripping each and every object it ever might encounter. You want it to learn on its own, and that is where advances in artificial intelligence come in.Take Brett. In a UC Berkeley lab, the humanoid robot has taught itself to conquer one of those children’s puzzles where you cram pegs into different shaped holes. It did so by trial and error through a process called reinforcement learning. No one told it how to get a square peg into a square hole, just that it needed to. So by making random movements and getting a digital reward (basically, yes, do that kind of thing again) each time it got closer to success, Brett learned something new on its own. The process is super slow, sure, but with time roboticists will hone the machines’ ability to teach themselves novel skills in novel environments, which is pivotal if we don’t want to get stuck babysitting them.Most PopularPoliticsThe Kate Middleton Photo Controversy Is an Inexplicable MessBrian BarrettScienceSolar-Powered Farming Is Quickly Depleting the World's Groundwater SupplyFred PearceSecurityAirbnb Bans All Indoor Security CamerasAmanda HooverScienceStumped by Heat Pumps?Rhett AllainAnother tack here is to have a digital version of a robot train first in simulation, then port what it has learned to the physical robot in a lab. Over at Google, researchers used motion-capture videos of dogs to program a simulated dog, then used reinforcement learning to get a simulated four-legged robot to teach itself to make the same movements. That is, even though both have four legs, the robot’s body is mechanically distinct from a dog’s, so they move in distinct ways. But after many random movements, the simulated robot got enough rewards to match the simulated dog. Then the researchers transferred that knowledge to the real robot in the lab, and sure enough, the thing could walk—in fact, it walked even faster than the robot manufacturer’s default gait, though in fairness it was less stable.13 Robots, Real and Imagined1 / 13ChevronChevronHeritage Images/Getty ImagesPygmalion (Ancient Greece) The start of it all. In Greek mythology, Pygmalion sculpted a female figure out of ivory, and found himself falling for her. He kissed her, and she felt warm, which is weird for ivory. Aphrodite transformed the statue into a real live human woman so Pygmalion could marry her. Thus comes an intelligent humanoid machine into being.They may be getting smarter day by day, but for the near future we are going to have to babysit the robots. As advanced as they’ve become, they still struggle to navigate our world. They plunge into fountains, for instance. So the solution, at least for the short term, is to set up call centers where robots can phone humans to help them out in a pinch. For example, Tug the hospital robot can call for help if it’s roaming the halls at night and there’s no human around to move a cart blocking its path. The operator would them teleoperate the robot around the obstruction.Speaking of hospital robots. When the coronavirus crisis took hold in early 2020, a group of roboticists saw an opportunity: Robots are the perfect coworkers in a pandemic. Engineers must use the crisis, they argued in an editorial, to supercharge the development of medical robots, which never get sick and can do the dull, dirty, and dangerous work that puts human medical workers in harm’s way. Robot helpers could take patients’ temperatures and deliver drugs, for instance. This would free up human doctors and nurses to do what they do best: problem-solving and being empathetic with patients, skills that robots may never be able to replicate.Most PopularPoliticsThe Kate Middleton Photo Controversy Is an Inexplicable MessBrian BarrettScienceSolar-Powered Farming Is Quickly Depleting the World's Groundwater SupplyFred PearceSecurityAirbnb Bans All Indoor Security CamerasAmanda HooverScienceStumped by Heat Pumps?Rhett AllainThe rapidly developing relationship between humans and robots is so complex that it has spawned its own field, known as human-robot interaction. The overarching challenge is this: It’s easy enough to adapt robots to get along with humans—make them soft and give them a sense of touch—but it’s another issue entirely to train humans to get along with the machines. With Tug the hospital robot, for example, doctors and nurses learn to treat it like a grandparent—get the hell out of its way and help it get unstuck if you have to. We also have to manage our expectations: Robots like Atlas may seem advanced, but they’re far from the autonomous wonders you might think.What humanity has done is essentially invented a new species, and now we’re maybe having a little buyers’ remorse. Namely, what if the robots steal all our jobs? Not even white-collar workers are safe from hyper-intelligent AI, after all.A lot of smart people are thinking about the singularity, when the machines grow advanced enough to make humanity obsolete. That will result in a massive societal realignment and species-wide existential crisis. What will we do if we no longer have to work? How does income inequality look anything other than exponentially more dire as industries replace people with machines?These seem like far-out problems, but now is the time to start pondering them. Which you might consider an upside to the killer-robot narrative that Hollywood has fed us all these years: The machines may be limited at the moment, but we as a society need to think seriously about how much power we want to cede. Take San Francisco, for instance, which is exploring the idea of a robot tax, which would force companies to pay up when they displace human workers.I can’t sit here and promise you that the robots won’t one day turn us all into batteries, but the more realistic scenario is that, unlike in the world of R.U.R., humans and robots are poised to live in harmony—because it’s already happening. This is the idea of multiplicity, that you’re more likely to work alongside a robot than be replaced by one. If your car has adaptive cruise control, you’re already doing this, letting the robot handle the boring highway work while you take over for the complexity of city driving. The fact that the US economy ground to a standstill during the coronavirus pandemic made it abundantly clear that robots are nowhere near ready to replace humans en masse.The machines promise to change virtually every aspect of human life, from health care to transportation to work. Should they help us drive? Absolutely. (They will, though, have to make the decision to sometimes kill, but the benefits of precision driving far outweigh the risks.) Should they replace nurses and cops? Maybe not—certain jobs may always require a human touch.One thing is abundantly clear: The machines have arrived. Now we have to figure out how to handle the responsibility of having invented a whole new species.Most PopularPoliticsThe Kate Middleton Photo Controversy Is an Inexplicable MessBrian BarrettScienceSolar-Powered Farming Is Quickly Depleting the World's Groundwater SupplyFred PearceSecurityAirbnb Bans All Indoor Security CamerasAmanda HooverScienceStumped by Heat Pumps?Rhett AllainLearn moreIf You Want a Robot to Learn Better, Be a Jerk to ItA good way to make a robot learn is to do the work in simulation, so the machine doesn’t accidentally hurt itself. Even better, you can give it tough love by trying to knock objects out of its hand.Spot the Robot Dog Trots Into the Big, Bad WorldBoston Dynamics' creation is starting to sniff out its role in the workforce: as a helpful canine that still sometimes needs you to hold its paw.Finally, a Robot That Moves Kind of Like a TongueOctopus arms and elephant trunks and human tongues move in a fascinating way, which has now inspired a fascinating new kind of robot.Robots Are Fueling the Quiet Ascendance of the Electric MotorFor something born over a century ago, the electric motor really hasn’t fully extended its wings. The problem? Fossil fuels are just too easy, and for the time being, cheap. But now, it’s actually robots, with their actuators, that are fueling the secret ascendence of the electric motor.This Robot Fish Powers Itself With Fake BloodA robot lionfish uses a rudimentary vasculature and “blood” to both energize itself and hydraulically power its fins.Inside the Amazon Warehouse Where Humans and Machines Become OneIn an Amazon sorting center, a swarm of robots works alongside humans. Here’s what that says about Amazon—and the future of work.This guide was last updated on April 13, 2020.Enjoyed this deep dive? Check out more WIRED Guides.Matt Simon is a senior staff writer covering biology, robotics, and the environment. He’s the author, most recently, of A Poison Like No Other: How Microplastics Corrupted Our Planet and Our Bodies.Staff WriterXTopicsWired GuiderobotsMore from WIREDStop Misunderstanding the Gender Health GapSex differences explain some of the gaping health inequalities between men and women—but a lot of the time, it’s sexism.Rob ReddickEmergency Planners Are Having a MomentGovernments, businesses, and even militaries pay for experts to help them prepare for the worst. In a world lurching from disaster to disaster, they're doing so more often.Rob ReddickForget Carbon Offsets. The Planet Needs Carbon Removal CreditsThe carbon removal market is fast growing, with an array of different removal methods available to businesses keen to mitigate their environmental impact.Stephen Armstrong23andMe Is Under Fire. Its Founder Remains ‘Optimistic’23andMe’s CEO Anne Wojcicki has saved the genetics company from the brink of failure before. She sat down with WIRED to talk about where it goes from here.Emily MullinGoogle’s Chess Experiments Reveal How to Boost the Power of AIBy rewarding computers that combined different approaches to solve chess puzzles, Google created an enhanced AI that could defeat its existing champion, AlphaZero.Stephen OrnesA New Headset Aims to Treat Alzheimer’s With Light and SoundAn experimental device developed by Cognito Therapeutics seeks to slow cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s patients using light and sound.Emily MullinSelective Forgetting Can Help AI Learn BetterErasing key information during training allows machine learning models to learn new languages faster and more easily.Amos ZeebergSo You Want to Rewire BrainsWhen everyone's hooking their brains up to computers, we'll need surgeons to install the hardware.Caitlin KellyWIRED is where tomorrow is realized. It is the essential source of information and ideas that make sense of a world in constant transformation. The WIRED conversation illuminates how technology is changing every aspect of our lives—from culture to business, science to design. The breakthroughs and innovations that we uncover lead to new ways of thinking, new connections, and new industries.More From WIREDSubscribeNewslettersFAQWIRED StaffEditorial StandardsArchiveRSSAccessibility HelpReviews and GuidesReviewsBuying GuidesCouponsMattressesElectric BikesFitness TrackersStreaming GuidesAdvertiseContact UsCustomer CareJobsPress CenterCondé Nast StoreUser AgreementPrivacy Policy & Cookie StatementYour California Privacy Rights© 2024 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. WIRED may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate Partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. Ad ChoicesSelect international siteUnited StatesLargeChevronUKItaliaJapónCzech Republic & SlovakiaFacebookXPinterestYouTubeInstagramTiktokDo Not Sell My Personal I

Robotics: What Are Robots? Robotics Definition & Uses. | Built In

tics: What Are Robots? Robotics Definition & Uses. | Built In Skip to main content Robotics.Robotics: What Are Robots? Robotics Definition & Uses.Written bySam DaleyUPDATED BYMatthew Urwin |  Feb. 13, 2024Robotics TechnologyRobotics is an interdisciplinary sector of science and engineering dedicated to the design, construction and use of mechanical robots. Our guide will give you a concrete grasp of robotics, including different types of robots and how they’re being applied across industries.Robotics: What It Is, How It WorksFuture of RoboticsHistory of RoboticsRobotics: What It Is, How It WorksWhat Is Robotics?Robotics is the intersection of science, engineering and technology that produces machines, called robots, that replicate or substitute for human actions. Robots perform basic and repetitive tasks with greater efficiency and accuracy than humans, making them ideal for industries like manufacturing. However, the introduction of artificial intelligence in robotics has given robots the ability to handle increasingly complex situations in various industries. What Is a Robot?A robot is a programmable machine that can complete a task, while the term robotics describes the field of study focused on developing robots and automation. Each robot has a different level of autonomy. These levels range from human-controlled bots that carry out tasks to fully-autonomous bots that perform tasks without any external influences.In terms of etymology, the word ‘robot’ is derived from the Czech word robota, which means “forced labor.” The word first appeared in the 1920 play R.U.R., in reference to the play’s characters who were mass-produced workers incapable of creative thinking. Robotics Aspects Mechanical ConstructionThe mechanical aspect of a robot helps it complete tasks in the environment for which it’s designed. For example, the Mars 2020 Rover’s wheels are individually motorized and made of titanium tubing that help it firmly grip the harsh terrain of the red planet.Electrical ComponentsRobots need electrical components that control and power the machinery. Essentially, an electric current — a battery, for example — is needed to power a large majority of robots.Software ProgramRobots contain at least some level of computer programming. Without a set of code telling it what to do, a robot would just be another piece of simple machinery. Inserting a program into a robot gives it the ability to know when and how to carry out a task. What Are the Main Components of a Robot? Control SystemComputation includes all of the components that make up a robot’s central processing unit, often referred to as its control system. Control systems are programmed to tell a robot how to utilize its specific components, similar in some ways to how the human brain sends signals throughout the body, in order to complete a specific task. These robotic tasks could comprise anything from minimally invasive surgery to assembly line packing.SensorsSensors provide a robot with stimuli in the form of electrical signals that are processed by the controller and allow the robot to interact with the outside world. Common sensors found within robots include video cameras that function as eyes, photoresistors that react to light and microphones that operate like ears. These sensors allow the robot to capture its surroundings and process the most logical conclusion based on the current moment and allows the controller to relay commands to the additional components.ActuatorsA device can only be considered to be a robot if it has a movable frame or body. Actuators are the components that are responsible for this movement. These components are made up of motors that receive signals from the control system and move in tandem to carry out the movement necessary to complete the assigned task. Actuators can be made of a variety of materials, such as metal or elastic, and are commonly operated by use of compressed air (pneumatic actuators) or oil (hydraulic actuators) but come in a variety of formats to best fulfill their specialized roles.Power SupplyLike the human body requires food in order to function, robots require power. Stationary robots, such as those found in a factory, may run on AC power through a wall outlet but more commonly, robots operate via an internal battery. Most robots utilize lead-acid batteries for their safe qualities and long shelf life while others may utilize the more compact but also more expensive silver-cadmium variety. Safety, weight, replaceability and lifecycle are all important factors to consider when designing a robot’s power supply. Some potential power sources for future robotic development also include pneumatic power from compressed gasses, solar power, hydraulic power, flywheel energy storage organic garbage through anaerobic digestion and nuclear power.End EffectorsEnd effectors are the physical, typically external components that allow robots to finish carrying out their tasks. Robots in factories often have interchangeable tools like paint sprayers and drills, surgical robots may be equipped with scalpels and other kinds of robots can be built with gripping claws or even hands for tasks like deliveries, packing, bomb diffusion and much more. How Do Robots Work?Some robots are pre-programmed to perform specific functions, meaning they operate in a controlled environment where they do simple, monotonous tasks — like a mechanical arm on an automotive assembly line.Other robots are autonomous, operating independently of human operators to carry out tasks in open environments. In order to work, they use sensors to perceive the world around them, and then employ decision-making structures (usually a computer) to take the optimal next step based on their data and mission.Robots may also work by using wireless networks to enable human control from a safe distance. These teleoperated robots usually work in extreme geographical conditions, weather and circumstances. Examples of teleoperated robots are the human-controlled submarines used to fix underwater pipe leaks during the BP oil spill or drones used to detect landmines on a battlefield. Types of Robotics Humanoid RobotsHumanoid robots are robots that look like or mimic human behavior. These robots usually perform human-like activities (like running, jumping and carrying objects), and are sometimes designed to look like us, even having human faces and expressions. Two of the most prominent examples of humanoid robots are Hanson Robotics’ Sophia and Boston Dynamics’ Atlas.CobotsCobots, or collaborative robots, are robots designed to work alongside humans. These robots prioritize safety by using sensors to remain aware of their surroundings, executing slow movements and ceasing actions when their movements are obstructed. Cobots typically perform simple tasks, freeing up humans to address more complex work.Industrial RobotsIndustrial robots automate processes in manufacturing environments like factories and warehouses. Possessing at least one robotic arm, these robots are made to handle heavy objects while moving with speed and precision. As a result, industrial robots often work in assembly lines to boost productivity.Medical RobotsMedical robots assist healthcare professionals in various scenarios and support the physical and mental health of humans. These robots rely on AI and sensors to navigate healthcare facilities, interact with humans and execute precise movements. Some medical robots can even converse with humans, encouraging people’s social and emotional growth.Agricultural RobotsAgricultural robots handle repetitive and labor-intensive tasks, allowing farmers to use their time and energy more efficiently. These robots also operate in greenhouses, where they monitor crops and help with harvests. Agricultural robots come in many forms, ranging from autonomous tractors to drones that collect data for farmers to analyze.MicroroboticsMicrorobotics is the study and development of robots on a miniature scale. Often no bigger than a millimeter, microrobots can vary in size, depending on the situation. Biotech researchers typically use microrobotics to monitor and treat diseases, with the goal of improving diagnostic tools and creating more targeted solutions.Augmenting RobotsAugmenting robots, also known as VR robots, either enhance current human capabilities or replace the capabilities a human may have lost. The field of robotics for human augmentation is a field where science fiction could become reality very soon, with bots that have the ability to redefine the definition of humanity by making humans faster and stronger. Some examples of current augmenting robots are robotic prosthetic limbs or exoskeletons used to lift hefty weights.Software BotsSoftware bots, or simply ‘bots,’ are computer programs which carry out tasks autonomously. They are not technically considered robots. One common use case of software robots is a chatbot, which is a computer program that simulates conversation both online and over the phone and is often used in customer service scenarios. Chatbots can either be simple services that answer questions with an automated response or more complex digital assistants that learn from user information. Robotics ApplicationsBeginning as a major boon for manufacturers, robotics has become a mainstay technology for a growing number of industries.ManufacturingIndustrial robots can assemble products, sort items, perform welds and paint objects. They may even be used to fix and maintain other machines in a factory or warehouse. HealthcareMedical robots transport medical supplies, perform surgical procedures and offer emotional support to those going through rehabilitation.  CompanionshipSocial robots can support children with learning disabilities and act as a therapeutic tool for people with dementia. They also have business applications like providing in-person customer service in hotels and moving products around warehouses. Home UseConsumers may be most familiar with the Roomba and other robot vacuum cleaners. However, other home robots include lawn-mowing robots and personal robot assistants that can play music, engage with children and help with household chores.Search and RescueSearch and rescue robots can save those stuck in flood waters, deliver supplies to those stranded in remote areas and put out fires when conditions become too extreme for firefighters. Pros and Cons of RoboticsRobotics comes with a number of benefits and drawbacks.Pros of RoboticsIncreased accuracy. Robots can perform movements and actions with greater precision and accuracy than humans.Enhanced productivity. Robots can work at a faster pace than humans and don’t get tired, leading to more consistent and higher-volume production. Improved safety. Robots can take on tasks and operate in environments unsafe for humans, protecting workers from injuries. Rapid innovation. Many robots are equipped with sensors and cameras that collect data, so teams can quickly refine processes. Greater cost-efficiency. Gains in productivity may make robots a more cost-efficient option for businesses compared to hiring more human workers.Cons of RoboticsJob losses. Robotic process automation may put human employees out of work, especially those who don’t have the skills to adapt to a changing workplace.  Limited creativity. Robots may not react well to unexpected situations since they don’t have the same problem-solving skills as humans. Data security risks. Robots can be hit with cyber attacks, potentially exposing large amounts of data if they’re connected to the Internet of Things.  Maintenance costs. Robots can be expensive to repair and maintain, and faulty equipment can lead to disruptions in production and revenue losses.  Environmental waste. Extracting raw materials to build robots and having to discard disposable parts can lead to more environmental waste and pollution.Future of RoboticsFuture of RoboticsThe evolution of AI has major implications for the future of robotics. In factories, AI can be combined with robotics to produce digital twins and design simulations to help companies improve their workflows. Advanced AI also gives robots increased autonomy. For example, drones could deliver packages to customers without any human intervention. In addition, robots could be outfitted with generative AI tools like ChatGPT, resulting in more complex human-robot conversations.As robots’ intelligence has shifted, so too have their appearances. Humanoid robots are designed to visually appeal to humans in various settings while understanding and responding to emotions, carrying objects and navigating environments. With these forms and abilities, robots can become major contributors in customer service, manufacturing, logistics and healthcare, among other industries.While the spread of robotics has stoked fears over job losses due to automation, robots could simply change the nature of human jobs. Humans may find themselves collaborating with robots, letting their robotic counterparts handle repetitive tasks while they focus on more difficult problems. Either way, humans will need to adapt to the presence of robots as robotics continues to progress alongside other technologies like AI and deep learning.  History of RoboticsHistory of RoboticsRobotics as a concept goes back to ancient times. The ancient Greeks combined automation and engineering to create the Antikythera, a handheld device that predicted eclipses. Centuries later, Leonardo Da Vinci designed a mechanical knight now known as “Leonardo’s Robot.” But it was the rise of manufacturing during the Industrial Revolution that highlighted the need for widespread automation.Following William Grey Walter’s development of the first autonomous robots in 1948, George Devol created the first industrial robotic arm known as Unimate. It began operating at a GM facility in 1959. In 1972, the Stanford Research Institute designed Shakey — the first AI-powered robot. Shakey used cameras and sensors to collect data from its surroundings and inform its next moves.The ability of robots to perceive their surroundings led researchers to explore whether they could also perceive human emotions. In the late 1990s, MIT’s Dr. Cynthia Breazeal built Kismet, a robotic head that used facial features to express and respond to human emotions. This predecessor to social robots opened the door for future robots like Roomba and consumer-centric inventions like Alexa and other voice assistants.Robots took another leap forward in 2012 due to a breakthrough in deep learning. Armed with volumes of digital images, British AI expert Geoffrey Hinton and his team successfully trained a system of neural networks to sort over one million images while making few errors. Since then, companies have incorporated deep learning into their technologies, promising more possibilities for robotics. 1700s(1737) Jacques de Vaucanson builds the first biomechanical automaton on record. Called the Flute Player, the mechanical device plays 12 songs.1920s(1920) The word “robot” makes its first appearance in Karel Capek’s play R.U.R. Robot is derived from the Czech word “robota,” which means “forced labor.”(1926) The first movie robot appears in Metropolis.1930s(1936) Alan Turing publishes “On Computable Numbers,” a paper that introduces the concept of a theoretical computer called the Turing Machine.1940s(1948) Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal is published by MIT professor Norbert Wiener. The book speaks on the concept of communications and control in electronic, mechanical and biological systems.(1949) William Grey Walter, a neurophysiologist and inventor, introduces Elmer and Elsie, a pair of battery-operated robots that look like tortoises. The robots move objects, find a source of light and find their way back to a charging station.1950s(1950) Isaac Asimov publishes the Three Laws of Robotics.(1950) Alan Turing publishes the paper “Computing Machinery and Intelligence,” proposing what is now known as the Turing Test, a method for determining if a machine is intelligent.1960s(1961) The first robotic arm works in a General Motors facility. The arm lifts and stacks metal parts and follows a program for approximately 200 movements. The arm was created by George Devol and his partner Joseph Engelberger.(1969) Victor Scheinman invents the Stanford Arm, a robotic arm with six joints that can mimic the movements of a human arm. It is one of the first robots designed to be controlled by a computer.1970s(1972) A group of engineers at the Stanford Research Institute create Shakey, the first robot to use artificial intelligence. Shakey completes tasks by observing its environment and forming a plan.The robot uses sensors, a range-finder and touch-sensitive apparatus to plan its moves.(1978) Hiroshi Makino, an automation researcher, designs a four-axis SCARA robotic arm. Known as the first “pick and place” robot, the arm is programmed to pick an object up, turn and place it in another location.1980s(1985) The first documented use of a robot-assisted surgical procedure uses the PUMA 560 robotic surgical arm. (1985) William Whittaker builds two remotely-operated robots that are sent to the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant. The robots work in the damaged reactor building’s basement to survey the site, send back information and drill core samples to measure radiation levels.(1989) MIT researchers Rodney Brooks and A. M. Flynn publish Fast, Cheap and Out of Control: A Robot Invasion of the Solar System. The paper argues for building many small, cheap robots rather than few big, expensive ones.1990s(1990) A group of researchers from MIT found iRobot, the company behind the Roomba vacuum cleaner. (1992) Marc Raibert, another MIT researcher, founds robotics company Boston Dynamics. (1997) Sojourner lands on Mars. The free-ranging rover sends 2.3 billion bits of data back to Earth, including more than 17,000 images, 15 chemical analyses of rocks and soil and extensive data on Mars’ weather.(1998) Furby, a robotic toy pet developed by Tiger Electronics, is released and eventually sells tens of millions of units. Furbys are preprogrammed to speak gibberish and learn other languages over time. (1999) Aibo, a robotic puppy powered by AI hits the commercial market. Developed by Sony, the robotic dog reacts to sounds and has some pre-programmed behavior.2000s(2000) Cynthia Breazeal creates a robotic head programmed to provoke emotions as well as react to them. Called Kismet, the robot consists of 21 motors, audio sensors and algorithms to understand vocal tone. (2000) Sony unveils the humanoid Sony Dream Robot, a bipedal humanoid entertainment robot it developed and marketed but never sold.(2001) iRobot’s PackBot searches the World Trade Center site after September 11th.(2002) iRobot creates Roomba. The vacuum robot is the first robot to become popular in the commercial sector amongst the public. (2003) Mick Mountz and the cofounders of Amazon Robotics (formerly Kiva Systems) invent the Kiva robot. The robot maneuvers around warehouses and moves goods.(2004) Boston Dynamics unveils BigDog, a quadruped robot controlled by humans. The robot is known for being more nimble than previous iterations of robots, as it is capable of only having two feet on the ground at a time. It has 50 sensors and an onboard computer that manages the gait and keeps it stable. (2004) The Defense Department’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency establishes the DARPA Grand Challenge. A self-driving car race that aims to inspire innovation in military autonomous vehicle tech. (2005) A Volkswagen Touareg named Stanley wins the second DARPA Grand Challenge. The car uses AI trained on the driving habits of real-world humans and five lidar laser sensors to complete a 131.2-mile course in the Mojave Desert.2010s(2011) NASA and General Motors collaborate to send Robonaut 2, a humanesque robotic assistant, into space on space shuttle Discovery. The robot becomes a permanent resident of the International Space Station.(2013) Boston Dynamics releases Atlas, a humanoid biped robot that uses 28 hydraulic joints to mimic human movements — including performing a backflip.(2012) The first license for a self-driven car is issued in Nevada. The car is a Toyota Prius modified with technology developed by Google. (2014) Canadian researchers develop ​​hitchBOT, a bot that hitchhikes across Canada and Europe as part of a social experiment.(2016) Sophia, a humanoid robot dubbed the first robot citizen, is created by Hanson Robotics. The robot is capable of facial recognition, verbal communication and facial expression.2020s(2020) Robots are used to distribute COVID-19 tests and vaccinations. (2020) 384,000 industrial robots are shipped across the globe to perform various manufacturing and warehouse jobs.  (2021) Cruise, an autonomous car company, conducts its first two robotaxi test rides in San Francisco. 23 Robotics Companies and Startups on the Forefront of InnovationAt robotics companies across America, the co-mingling of engineering and science is producing some truly innovative products. Read Article Types of Robots and How They’re Used More StoriesBack to Top Underwater Robotics: How It Works and Examples Read Article What Are Industrial Robots? Deep Tech, Explained What Are Shape-Shifting Robots? Why We Send Robots to Space (and 7 Examples) 7 Extraordinary Robots From the World Robot Conference Read Article Xenobots: The Self-Replicating Living Robots 21 Examples of Robotic Process Automation 6 Top Industrial Automation Companies What Are Robot Bees? What Is a Social Robot? Read Article Medical Robots Transforming Healthcare: 11 Examples Continue ReadingWhat Is Nanorobotics?What Does a Robotics Engineer Do?What It’s Like to Work With a RobotWhat Is Machine Vision?The Tesla Robot: Here’s What We Know14 Examples of the Uncanny ValleyIt’s Time to Talk About Sex TechThe Future of Robots and RoboticsWhat Is Robotics as a Service (RaaS)?16 Agricultural Robots and Farm Robots You Should KnowA Guide to Autonomous Mobile RobotsWhat Are Cobots and How Are We Using Them?Top 8 Robotic Programming LanguagesMicrorobotics: Tiny Robots and Their Many UsesIs the Construction Industry Ready to Embrace Robots?20 Top Industrial Robot Companies to KnowTop 22 Humanoid Robots in Use Right Now31 AI Robotics Companies Driving InnovationExoskeleton Suits: 20 Real-Life ExamplesA Software Revolution Is About to Sweep Robotics12 Publicly Traded Robotics Companies That Are Changing the Game Robots Aren’t Just for High-Tech Labs and Heavy Industry Anymore. And That’s a Good Thing.8 Industries Poised to Benefit From Augmented and Virtual RealityRobotic Research Got $228M, Tribaja’s New Office, and More D.C. Tech NewsRobotic Research Raises $228M to Scale Autonomous Commercial VehiclesThe Secret to Success in Tech? Don’t Panic.Do Robots Have a Race?Cruise Engineers Balance Safety With Experimentation in the Pursuit of Autonomous VehiclesAI Taking Over Jobs: What to Know About the Future of JobsCould You Kill a Robot Dinosaur?More Women Are Needed in Robotics Technician RolesCan Haptic Feedback Tech Help Us Feel More?U.S. Manufacturing Jobs Aren’t Gone — They’re Evolving9 Houston Robotics Companies Moving the World Closer to an Automation-First FutureHow Companion Uses TensorFlow to Build a Robotic Pet TrainerOnline Grocery Orders Could Be a Robotics Gold RushHow Root AI’s Agricultural Robots Are Powering the Farmtech RevolutionHow Robots Can Help Us Beat the PandemicWhy Are Robots Designed to Be Cute?How Oracle's Chicago Innovation Lab Is Building the Future of ConstructionHow MIT Uses Artificial Intelligence to Train Delivery Robots to Find Front Doors12 Examples of Rescue Robots You Should KnowAre Police Robots the Future of Law Enforcement?Robots for Hire: 6 Ways Robots Help Humans7 Examples of Robotics in Education to KnowFrom diffusing bombs to performing surgery, VR is turning people into robots (sort of)11 Robotics Applications in Banking and Finance14 Restaurant Robots Changing the Food Industry12 Car and Automotive Robotics Companies to KnowHuman-robot collaboration at Amazon reveals the future of workJD.com and Rakuten join forces to enable drone deliveries in JapanHouston area police invest in drones as future of law enforcementJohnson & Johnson acquires robotics company Auris HealthFAA: Drones must show registration number on exteriorWeed trimmers concerned robots may spell end for livelihoodOklahoma lawmakers consider drone ban over rural propertyAutonomous scanners debut at Tampa Bay WalmartsAerial drones to map Jewish cemeteries in preservation effortsQualcomm expands automotive and robotics offeringsPanasonic collaborates with academia to build consumer robotsDrones help researchers manage koala populationsFLIR acquires military robot firm Endeavor for $385 millionSmall Isles of Scotland get a close-up courtesy of dronesDroneSeed replants trees to keep forests healthyU.S. companies install record-breaking number of robotsFedEx to roll out last mile delivery bot Zipline founder talks about upcoming North Carolina pilotDrones to locate avalanche victims fasterNASA to test drone flights in Nevada and TexasDrone collision with commercial plane could doom industry, U.S. House Rep. warnsLandmine-detecting drones could help save livesNet-releasing drone grenades are the latest in anti-drone techRobotics startup Dispatch helped Amazon build ScoutRobots dismantle 100,000 aging chemical weaponsBoston Dynamics receives additional $37 million from SoftBankService bots becoming a familiar sight at public facilities in ChinaPakistan using drones to plant trees and ward off climate changeCuriosity rover on Mars uses sensors to measure mountainShark or dolphin? Scientists put drones to the testBangkok deploys drones to fight back against air pollutionWorld Economic Forum releases Advanced Drone Operator's Toolkit at DavosAnimals appear to become acclimated to dronesTo deliver emergency medical supplies, Alaska is going from mushers to dronesDrones used for biocontrol to curb invasive cacti in KenyaDelivery robots transform campus life at George MasonPoison-dropping drones fight back rat invasion on islandSidewalk robots to begin delivering Amazon packagesGatwick announces plans to roll out fleet of valet-parking robotsUnderwater robots explore Antarctic ice shelfSmart pill maker Proteus launches oncology studyWaymo doubling down on self-driving car production in DetroitLeading drone maker uncovers extensive employee fraudFacebook and Airbus may be collaborating on solar-powered dronesUber reportedly explores autonomous bikes and bikesDrone use could reduce the likelihood of secondary car accidents Robotic model approximates gait of earliest land animals"Shelf"-aware drones monitor inventory in real timeLee County, N.C. invests in drone training for public safetyBee-lieve it or not, drones are pollinating orchardsToyota doubling down on robotics for elder careDrones spot protected bird species in tall grassPentagon: Insect brains to inspire AI-powered military roboticsMarty the robot is Giant Food's latest employeeRobotic tech developed to conduct spinal surgery Robot mishaps turn dream into heartbreak hotelWalmart rolls out autonomous-driving van fleet from UdelvLife-saving drones to deliver organ transplantsNvidia's robotics research lab opens in SeattleAlphabet unit Wing displays system to track, identify dronesDrone restrictions to ease, says U.S. Department of TransportationThe BreadBot knows its way around an ovenUK researchers build AI robot to roam the Red PlanetSafir project aims to harmonize rules for drone use in EuropePepsiCo rolls out robot to deliver healthy snacks to college studentsSegway enters the delivery robot space with Loomo DeliveryRural Australians object to noise in drone pilot, says WSJTorc Robotics and Transdev partner for autonomous shuttle fleetU.S. Army recruits robots for combatChinese e-commerce giant JD.com rolls out autonomous delivery robot fleetVanuatu becomes site of world’s first drone-delivered vaccineSweeper the robot picks ripe peppers in 24 secondsUndersea robot delivers baby coral to Great Barrier ReefThe Da Vinci surgical robot comes with advantages and risksKroger runs autonomous delivery pilotDelivery robot startup works towards inclusive futureRobots widening gender gap, says World Economic Forum reportThe Lovot is cracking the code to your heartRobot accident at Amazon warehouse renews safety debatePostmates delivery robot set to make debutGoogle teaches robots how to recognize objectsCulturally adaptable robots may be the future of elder careWake up and smell the automation: coffee sales to decline due to robotsRobot bartender to debut at Mile High during Broncos-Browns gameBipedal robots could innovate prosthetic devicesNASA's Iceworm robot dares to scale Antarctic volcanoRobots finding work in the world's busiest airportsFacebook sets sights on soft roboticsAmazon Web Services launches RobomakerDrone powered inspections monitoring bridge safetyRobot fry cook Flippy makes a bid for Walmart deli kitchens​With help from Intel, Delair's drones are flying highGreat Companies Need Great People. That's Where We Come In.Recruit With Us Built In is the online community for startups and tech companies. Find startup jobs, tech news and events. About Our Story Careers Our Staff Writers Content Descriptions Company News Get Involved Recruit With Built In Subscribe to Our Newsletter Become an Expert Contributor Send Us a News Tip Resources Customer Support Share Feedback Report a Bug Tech A-Z Browse Jobs Tech Hubs Built In Austin Built In Boston Built In Chicago Built In Colorado Built In LA Built In NYC Built In San Francisco Built In Seattle See All Tech Hubs © Built In 2024 Learning Lab User Agreement Accessibility Statement Copyright Policy Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices/Cookie Settings CA Notice of Collection

What Is a Robot? - ROBOTS: Your Guide to the World of Robotics

Is a Robot? - ROBOTS: Your Guide to the World of RoboticsJoin IEEEIEEE.orgIEEE Xplore Digital LibraryIEEE StandardsIEEE SpectrumMore SitesSearchRobotsRankingsLearnPlayNewsArticlesTypes of RobotsHow to Get Started in RoboticsWhat Is a Robot?Robotics QuestionsResourcesActivity SheetsRobotics GlossarySTEM ResourcesWhat Is a Robot?Top roboticists explain their definition of robotWritten by Erico GuizzoAugust 9, 2023Updated August 9, 2023Robots are a diverse bunch. Some use wheels to move, while others walk around on two, four, or even six legs. Underwater robots can swim, and drones can take to the skies. Some robots assemble delicate microchips in spotless facilities; others toil away in dusty car factories. There are robots the size of a coin and robots bigger than refrigerators. Some robots can make pancakes. Others can land on Mars.This diversity—in size, design, capabilities—means it's not easy to come up with a definition of what a robot is.In fact, the term "robot" means different things to different people. Even roboticists themselves have different notions about what is or isn't a robot. And for most of us, science fiction has strongly influenced what we expect a robot to look like and be able to do.A simple definition of a robotSo what makes a robot? Here's a definition that is neither too general nor too specific:A robot is an autonomous machine capable of sensing its environment, carrying out computations to make decisions, and performing actions in the real world.Think of the Roomba robotic vacuum. It uses sensors to autonomously drive around a room, going around furniture and avoiding stairs; it carries out computations to make sure it covers the entire room and when deciding if a spot needs a more thorough cleaning; and it performs an action by "sucking dirt," as roboticist Rodney Brooks, one of the Roomba creators, explains.But no definition is perfect. You may argue, and perhaps rightly so, that the definition above could very well describe a dishwasher, a thermostat, an elevator, an automatic door, and many other systems and appliances around us. Is a dishwasher a robot?Famed roboticist Rodney Brooks explains his definition of robot, and whether a dishwasher is a robot or not.Rodney BrooksProfessor of Robotics Emeritus at MIT, Co-founder and CTO of Robust AIWhat makes something a robot?Take, for example, cruise control in cars. It senses how fast the vehicle is going, compares it to a preset speed, and accelerates or brakes as needed. Is cruise control a robot?For his part, Brooks is not enthusiastic about considering dishwashers a class of robot. But other roboticists are less strict. A home thermostat can measure the ambient temperature, check a prestored schedule, and turn on the heating or cooling system accordingly. For Gill Pratt, another roboticist, that's enough to call a thermostat a simple robot.The thing to keep in mind about this or any other definition is that robots can typically do three things: SenseComputeAct These three components vary widely from robot to robot. To sense the world, some robots use simple devices, like an obstacle-detecting sonar, while other robots rely on multiple sensors, including cameras, gyroscopes, and laser range finders. Likewise, the compute part can involve everything from a small electronic circuit to a powerful multicore processor or even a cluster of networked computers. As for the action, this is where robots vary the most: Some robots can move around; others can manipulate things. Some robots can move around and manipulate things. Some are designed to perform specific tasks, while others are more versatile and can do many different things.How do robots work?But although robots vary in how they sense, compute, and act, they all operate in a similar way: Their sensors feed measurements to a controller or computer, which processes them and then sends control signals to motors and actuators. A robot is constantly repeating this sensing-computing-acting cycle, in what roboticists call a "feedback loop." So you could say that feedback is the technique that makes machines "smart," and almost every robot uses feedback.To make things more concrete, consider BigDog, a rough-terrain quadruped robot developed by Boston Dynamics. BigDog uses sensors to measure the position of its leg joints and the forces applied on them. It also uses gyroscopes and an inertial measurement unit (IMU) to keep track of its position in relation to the ground. Based on that information, BigDog's computer calculates which hydraulic actuators it should activate to move the robotic legs.As BigDog takes a step, it's continually (several thousand times per second) updating its sensor, computer, and actuator information in a feedback loop that allows the robot to autonomously walk, trot, climb hills, and step over obstacles. Its creators have even kicked BigDog while it was walking and the robot didn't fall down.To build BigDog, Boston Dynamics engineers studied how real animals run and balance. They used some of those ideas to develop sensing, computing, and actuation systems, and then they combined these three components in a feedback loop that gives BigDog great agility, allowing it to climb hills and even walk on an icy road. More recently, Boston Dynamics took robot agility to new extremes with machines like Spot and Atlas.What about autonomy in robots?Let's go back to our original definition. Another key concept that we should mention is the notion of autonomy. We said robots are autonomous machines, but the level of autonomy differs from robot to robot. Some robots are controlled remotely by human operators. Other robots can run without any kind of human intervention. And a large number of robots rely on both remote control and autonomous behavior.Again, people will disagree on how much autonomy a machine needs to be called a robot. You can try to tweak the original definition to suit your own opinion on this issue, but the fact is, most definitions will never be perfect. When asked to define a robot, robotics pioneer Joseph Engelberger once said, "I don't know how to define one, but I know one when I see one!"Maybe that is the perfect definition of a robot.An exciting time for roboticsMIT roboticist Daniela Rus explains why she believes the age of robotics is upon us as more robots get out of research labs.Daniela RusProfessor of electrical engineering and computer science and Director of the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) at MITThe future of roboticsAnother question you may be asking yourself is, Where is my robot? Where are all those helpful robotic systems and humanoids that science fiction promised we'd have by now? Why can't a robot do my laundry for me?The reality is that there remain huge challenges ahead for robotics, and practical home robots are still many years away. Many of the same problems that kept robots limited to factories and research labs are still around today. Two main issues are cost and complexity. Cost is easy to understand: Robotics components, including specialized sensors and computers, but especially actuators to power wheels and robotic arms, are still too costly. And the more capable you want to make your robot, the more components you'll need, so the cost adds up quickly. As for the complexity problem, when you combine sensors, computers, actuators, software, and user interfaces into a robot and try to operate it in the real world, things still don't work perfectly. The robot operates too slowly. Or it acts in an unsafe manner. Or it face-plants into the ground, like many did at a major robotics competition featuring some of the world's most sophisticated robots.To put it another way, things don't work as well as they would need to in order to turn that robot into a practical commercial system.Now here's the good news: Progress in solving those challenges is not only happening—it's happening faster and faster. Daniela Rus, a roboticist at MIT, believes that "the age of robotics is really upon us." Advances in robotics technology, she says, will have a big impact on everyday life as robots leave the lab and become capable, useful machines operating in real environments. Areas that are seeing promising breakthroughs include robot vision, learning, and navigation. Robots are getting better at recognizing objects and people, mapping indoor and outdoor spaces, and moving through real-world human environments. Robot manipulation and biped locomotion are advancing too, though more slowly.A key development is that the technological advances in processors and sensors that made computers and smartphones better and cheaper are also benefiting robots. It's getting easier to equip robots with powerful sensing and computing systems. Another benefit is that researchers don't have to keep reinventing the wheel when it comes to assembling a robot, and that means they can pay more attention to robotics software.AI for robotsRobotics software is a big deal. Without effective and robust algorithms, a robot will never be able to accomplish much. Tools for robot simulation, control, and learning are getting better, but many roboticists would like to see them improving at an even faster rate. There's hope that recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) could give robotics a major boost, and that is currently a very active area of research.Hardware and software standards that would allow different robots to interface more easily are still lacking, but today's robots are not the one-of-a-kind laboratory contraptions they used to be. Major robot makers are relying on open (or mostly open) software platforms, like the Robot Operating System, tapping on their user communities to develop capabilities they'd never be able to develop on their own.Clearly, things are moving in the right direction for robotics. So, where's my robot? you continue to ask.The answer is that if we want capable, affordable robots to help us in the future, we need more people to develop such robots. That's right. In the end, it all depends on you to help build the future of robotics. See our guide on "How to Get Started in Robotics." Then start building robots, join a robotics club or competition, take a robotics course, and become a roboticist.And maybe then you'll build a robot to do your laundry. And mine too, please.More Articles & ResourcesTypes of RobotsarticleCategories frequently used to classify robotsActivity SheetsresourceFun activities to keep kids entertained while they learn about robotsFounding Sponsorscreated by IEEE SpectrumAboutContactDonateSponsorsAbout IEEEContact & SupportAccessibilityNondiscrimination PolicyTermsIEEE Privacy PolicyCookie PreferencesCopyright © 2023 IEEE — All rights reserved. A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity.Structured content powered by Sanity.io.Site by Pentagram and Standard.

Robotics - Wikipedia

Robotics - Wikipedia

Jump to content

Main menu

Main menu

move to sidebar

hide

Navigation

Main pageContentsCurrent eventsRandom articleAbout WikipediaContact usDonate

Contribute

HelpLearn to editCommunity portalRecent changesUpload file

Search

Search

Create account

Log in

Personal tools

Create account Log in

Pages for logged out editors learn more

ContributionsTalk

Contents

move to sidebar

hide

(Top)

1Robotics aspects

2Applied robotics

3Components

Toggle Components subsection

3.1Power source

3.2Actuation

3.2.1Electric motors

3.2.2Linear actuators

3.2.3Series elastic actuators

3.2.4Air muscles

3.2.5Wire muscles

3.2.6Electroactive polymers

3.2.7Piezo motors

3.2.8Elastic nanotubes

3.3Sensing

3.3.1Touch

3.3.2Other

3.4Manipulation

3.4.1Mechanical grippers

3.4.2Suction end-effectors

3.4.3General purpose effectors

3.5Locomotion

3.5.1Rolling robots

3.5.1.1Two-wheeled balancing robots

3.5.1.2One-wheeled balancing robots

3.5.1.3Spherical orb robots

3.5.1.4Six-wheeled robots

3.5.1.5Tracked robots

3.5.2Walking robots

3.5.2.1ZMP technique

3.5.2.2Hopping

3.5.2.3Dynamic balancing (controlled falling)

3.5.2.4Passive dynamics

3.5.3Other methods of locomotion

3.5.3.1Flying

3.5.3.1.1Biomimetic flying robots (BFRs)

3.5.3.1.2Biologically-inspired flying robots

3.5.3.2Snaking

3.5.3.3Skating

3.5.3.4Climbing

3.5.3.5Swimming (Piscine)

3.5.3.6Sailing

4Control

5Automation

Toggle Automation subsection

5.1Vision

5.2Environmental interaction and navigation

5.3Human-robot interaction

5.3.1Speech recognition

5.3.2Robotic voice

5.3.3Gestures

5.3.4Facial expression

5.3.5Artificial emotions

5.3.6Personality

5.3.7Proxemics

6Research robotics

Toggle Research robotics subsection

6.1Dynamics and kinematics

6.2Open source robotics

6.3Evolutionary robotics

6.4Bionics and biomimetics

6.5Swarm robotics

6.6Quantum computing

6.7Other research areas

7Human factors

Toggle Human factors subsection

7.1Education and training

7.2Employment

7.3Occupational safety and health implications

7.4User experience

8Careers

9History

10See also

11Notes

12References

13Further reading

14External links

Toggle the table of contents

Robotics

80 languages

AfrikaansالعربيةAsturianuAzərbaycancaবাংলাБългарскиBosanskiCatalàЧӑвашлаČeštinaDanskDeutschEestiΕλληνικάEspañolEsperantoEstremeñuEuskaraفارسیFrançaisGaeilgeGalegoGĩkũyũ한국어Հայերենहिन्दीHrvatskiBahasa IndonesiaInterlingueIsiZuluÍslenskaItalianoעבריתJawaಕನ್ನಡҚазақшаລາວLatinaLatviešuLietuviųLingua Franca NovaМакедонскиമലയാളംBahasa MelayuNederlands日本語Norsk bokmålNouormandOccitanOʻzbekcha / ўзбекчаپښتوPolskiPortuguêsQaraqalpaqshaRomânăRuna SimiРусскийShqipසිංහලSimple EnglishSlovenčinaСрпски / srpskiSrpskohrvatski / српскохрватскиSuomiSvenskaTagalogதமிழ்తెలుగుไทยTürkçeУкраїнськаاردوVènetoTiếng ViệtWinaray吴语粵語ZazakiŽemaitėška中文

Edit links

ArticleTalk

English

ReadEditView history

Tools

Tools

move to sidebar

hide

Actions

ReadEditView history

General

What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationCite this pageGet shortened URLDownload QR codeWikidata item

Print/export

Download as PDFPrintable version

In other projects

Wikimedia CommonsWikinewsWikiversity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Design, construction, use, and application of robots

Not to be confused with Cybernetics.

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)

This article may relate to a different subject or has undue weight on an aspect of the subject. Specifically, the article goes too much detail on specific types of robots. Please help relocate relevant information and remove irrelevant ones. (November 2022)

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: "Robotics" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (November 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

(Learn how and when to remove this template message)

The Shadow robot hand system

Part of a series onAutomation

Automation in general

Banking

Building

Home

Highway system

Laboratory

Library

Broadcast

Mix

Pool cleaner

Pop music

Reasoning

Semi-automation

Telephone

Attendant

Switchboard

Teller machine

Vehicular

Vending machine

Robotics and robots

Domestic

Vacuum cleaner

Roomba

Lawn mower

Guided vehicle

Industrial

Paint

ODD

Impact of automation

Manumation

OOL

Bias

Self-driving cars

Technological unemployment

Jobless recovery

Post-work society

Threat

Trade shows and awards

ASP-DAC

DAC

DATE

IEEE Robotics and Automation Award

ICCAD

vte

Robotics is the interdisciplinary study and practice of the design, construction, operation, and use of robots.[1]

Within mechanical engineering, robotics is the design and construction of the physical structures of robots, while in computer science, robotics focuses on robotic automation algorithms. Other disciplines contributing to robotics include electrical, control, software, information, electronic, telecommunication, computer, mechatronic, materials and biomedical engineering.

The goal of most robotics is to design machines that can help and assist humans. Many robots are built to do jobs that are hazardous to people, such as finding survivors in unstable ruins, and exploring space, mines and shipwrecks. Others replace people in jobs that are boring, repetitive, or unpleasant, such as cleaning, monitoring, transporting, and assembling. Today, robotics is a rapidly growing field, as technological advances continue; researching, designing, and building new robots serve various practical purposes.

Robotics aspects[edit]

Mechanical construction

Electrical aspect

Programming aspect

There are many types of robots; they are used in many different environments and for many different uses. Although diverse in application and form, they all share three basic aspects when it comes to their design and construction:

Mechanical construction: a frame, form or shape designed to achieve a particular task. For example, a robot designed to travel across heavy dirt or mud might use caterpillar tracks. Origami inspired robots can sense and analyze in extreme environments.[2] The mechanical aspect of the robot is mostly the creator's solution to completing the assigned task and dealing with the physics of the environment around it. Form follows function.

Electrical components that power and control the machinery. For example, the robot with caterpillar tracks would need some kind of power to move the tracker treads. That power comes in the form of electricity, which will have to travel through a wire and originate from a battery, a basic electrical circuit. Even petrol-powered machines that get their power mainly from petrol still require an electric current to start the combustion process which is why most petrol-powered machines like cars, have batteries. The electrical aspect of robots is used for movement (through motors), sensing (where electrical signals are used to measure things like heat, sound, position, and energy status), and operation (robots need some level of electrical energy supplied to their motors and sensors in order to activate and perform basic operations)

Software. A program is how a robot decides when or how to do something. In the caterpillar track example, a robot that needs to move across a muddy road may have the correct mechanical construction and receive the correct amount of power from its battery, but would not be able to go anywhere without a program telling it to move. Programs are the core essence of a robot, it could have excellent mechanical and electrical construction, but if its program is poorly structured, its performance will be very poor (or it may not perform at all). There are three different types of robotic programs: remote control, artificial intelligence, and hybrid. A robot with remote control programming has a preexisting set of commands that it will only perform if and when it receives a signal from a control source, typically a human being with remote control. It is perhaps more appropriate to view devices controlled primarily by human commands as falling in the discipline of automation rather than robotics. Robots that use artificial intelligence interact with their environment on their own without a control source, and can determine reactions to objects and problems they encounter using their preexisting programming. A hybrid is a form of programming that incorporates both AI and RC functions in them.

Applied robotics[edit]

As more and more robots are designed for specific tasks, this method of classification becomes more relevant. For example, many robots are designed for assembly work, which may not be readily adaptable for other applications. They are termed "assembly robots". For seam welding, some suppliers provide complete welding systems with the robot i.e. the welding equipment along with other material handling facilities like turntables, etc. as an integrated unit. Such an integrated robotic system is called a "welding robot" even though its discrete manipulator unit could be adapted to a variety of tasks. Some robots are specifically designed for heavy load manipulation, and are labeled as "heavy-duty robots".[3]

Current and potential applications include:

Manufacturing. Robots have been increasingly used in manufacturing since the 1960s. According to the Robotic Industries Association US data, in 2016 the automotive industry was the main customer of industrial robots with 52% of total sales.[4] In the auto industry, they can amount for more than half of the "labor". There are even "lights off" factories such as an IBM keyboard manufacturing factory in Texas that was fully automated as early as 2003.[5]

Autonomous transport including self-driving cars and airplane autopilot

Domestic robots including Robotic vacuum cleaners

Construction robots. Construction robots can be separated into three types: traditional robots, robotic arm, and robotic exoskeleton.[6]

Agricultural robots.[7] The use of robots in agriculture is closely linked to the concept of AI-assisted precision agriculture and drone usage.[8]

Medical robots of various types (such as da Vinci Surgical System and Hospi); and Robot-assisted surgery designed and used in clinics.[9]

Food processing. Commercial examples of kitchen automation are Flippy (burgers), Zume Pizza (pizza), Cafe X (coffee), Makr Shakr (cocktails), Frobot (frozen yogurts), Sally (salads),[10] salad or food bowl robots manufactured by Dexai (a Draper Laboratory spinoff, operating on military bases), and integrated food bowl assembly systems manufactured by Spyce Kitchen (acquired by Sweetgreen) and Silicon Valley startup Hyphen.[11] Home examples are Rotimatic (flatbreads baking)[12] and Boris (dishwasher loading).[13] Other examples may include manufacturing technologies based on 3D Food Printing.

Automated mining

Space exploration, including Mars rovers

Cleanup of contaminated areas, such as toxic waste or nuclear facilities.[a]

Robotic lawn mowers and Sports field line marking.

Robot sports for entertainment and education, including Robot combat, Autonomous racing, drone racing, and FIRST Robotics

Military robots.

Components[edit]

Power source[edit]

Further information: Power supply and Energy storage

The InSight lander with solar panels deployed in a cleanroom

At present, mostly (lead–acid) batteries are used as a power source. Many different types of batteries can be used as a power source for robots. They range from lead–acid batteries, which are safe and have relatively long shelf lives but are rather heavy compared to silver–cadmium batteries which are much smaller in volume and are currently much more expensive. Designing a battery-powered robot needs to take into account factors such as safety, cycle lifetime, and weight. Generators, often some type of internal combustion engine, can also be used. However, such designs are often mechanically complex and need fuel, require heat dissipation, and are relatively heavy. A tether connecting the robot to a power supply would remove the power supply from the robot entirely. This has the advantage of saving weight and space by moving all power generation and storage components elsewhere. However, this design does come with the drawback of constantly having a cable connected to the robot, which can be difficult to manage.[15]

Potential power sources could be:

pneumatic (compressed gases)

Solar power (using the sun's energy and converting it into electrical power)

hydraulics (liquids)

flywheel energy storage

organic garbage (through anaerobic digestion)

nuclear

Actuation[edit]

Main article: Actuator

A robotic leg powered by air muscles

Actuators are the "muscles" of a robot, the parts which convert stored energy into movement.[16] By far the most popular actuators are electric motors that rotate a wheel or gear, and linear actuators that control industrial robots in factories. There are some recent advances in alternative types of actuators, powered by electricity, chemicals, or compressed air.

Electric motors[edit]

Main article: Electric motor

The vast majority of robots use electric motors, often brushed and brushless DC motors in portable robots or AC motors in industrial robots and CNC machines. These motors are often preferred in systems with lighter loads, and where the predominant form of motion is rotational.

Linear actuators[edit]

Main article: Linear actuator

Various types of linear actuators move in and out instead of by spinning, and often have quicker direction changes, particularly when very large forces are needed such as with industrial robotics. They are typically powered by compressed and oxidized air (pneumatic actuator) or an oil (hydraulic actuator) Linear actuators can also be powered by electricity which usually consists of a motor and a leadscrew. Another common type is a mechanical linear actuator such as a rack and pinion on a car.

Series elastic actuators[edit]

Series elastic actuation (SEA) relies on the idea of introducing intentional elasticity between the motor actuator and the load for robust force control. Due to the resultant lower reflected inertia, series elastic actuation improves safety when a robot interacts with the environment (e.g., humans or workpieces) or during collisions.[17] Furthermore, it also provides energy efficiency and shock absorption (mechanical filtering) while reducing excessive wear on the transmission and other mechanical components. This approach has successfully been employed in various robots, particularly advanced manufacturing robots[18] and walking humanoid robots.[19][20]

The controller design of a series elastic actuator is most often performed within the passivity framework as it ensures the safety of interaction with unstructured environments.[21] Despite its remarkable stability and robustness, this framework suffers from the stringent limitations imposed on the controller which may trade-off performance. The reader is referred to the following survey which summarizes the common controller architectures for SEA along with the corresponding sufficient passivity conditions.[22] One recent study has derived the necessary and sufficient passivity conditions for one of the most common impedance control architectures, namely velocity-sourced SEA.[23] This work is of particular importance as it drives the non-conservative passivity bounds in an SEA scheme for the first time which allows a larger selection of control gains.

Air muscles[edit]

Main article: Pneumatic artificial muscles

Pneumatic artificial muscles also known as air muscles, are special tubes that expand (typically up to 42%) when air is forced inside them. They are used in some robot applications.[24][25][26]

Wire muscles[edit]

Main article: Shape memory alloy

Muscle wire, also known as shape memory alloy, Nitinol® or Flexinol® wire, is a material that contracts (under 5%) when electricity is applied. They have been used for some small robot applications.[27][28]

Electroactive polymers[edit]

Main article: Electroactive polymers

EAPs or EPAMs are a plastic material that can contract substantially (up to 380% activation strain) from electricity, and have been used in facial muscles and arms of humanoid robots,[29] and to enable new robots to float,[30] fly, swim or walk.[31]

Piezo motors[edit]

Main article: Piezoelectric motor

Recent alternatives to DC motors are piezo motors or ultrasonic motors. These work on a fundamentally different principle, whereby tiny piezoceramic elements, vibrating many thousands of times per second, cause linear or rotary motion. There are different mechanisms of operation; one type uses the vibration of the piezo elements to step the motor in a circle or a straight line.[32] Another type uses the piezo elements to cause a nut to vibrate or to drive a screw. The advantages of these motors are nanometer resolution, speed, and available force for their size.[33] These motors are already available commercially and being used on some robots.[34][35]

Elastic nanotubes[edit]

Further information: Carbon nanotube

Elastic nanotubes are a promising artificial muscle technology in early-stage experimental development. The absence of defects in carbon nanotubes enables these filaments to deform elastically by several percent, with energy storage levels of perhaps 10 J/cm3 for metal nanotubes. Human biceps could be replaced with an 8 mm diameter wire of this material. Such compact "muscle" might allow future robots to outrun and outjump humans.[36]

Sensing[edit]

Main articles: Robotic sensing and Robotic sensors

Sensors allow robots to receive information about a certain measurement of the environment, or internal components. This is essential for robots to perform their tasks, and act upon any changes in the environment to calculate the appropriate response. They are used for various forms of measurements, to give the robots warnings about safety or malfunctions, and to provide real-time information about the task it is performing.

Touch[edit]

Main article: Tactile sensor

Current robotic and prosthetic hands receive far less tactile information than the human hand. Recent research has developed a tactile sensor array that mimics the mechanical properties and touch receptors of human fingertips.[37][38] The sensor array is constructed as a rigid core surrounded by conductive fluid contained by an elastomeric skin. Electrodes are mounted on the surface of the rigid core and are connected to an impedance-measuring device within the core. When the artificial skin touches an object the fluid path around the electrodes is deformed, producing impedance changes that map the forces received from the object. The researchers expect that an important function of such artificial fingertips will be adjusting the robotic grip on held objects.

Scientists from several European countries and Israel developed a prosthetic hand in 2009, called SmartHand, which functions like a real one —allowing patients to write with it, type on a keyboard, play piano, and perform other fine movements. The prosthesis has sensors which enable the patient to sense real feelings in its fingertips.[39]

Further information: Sensory-motor map

Other[edit]

Other common forms of sensing in robotics use lidar, radar, and sonar.[40] Lidar measures the distance to a target by illuminating the target with laser light and measuring the reflected light with a sensor. Radar uses radio waves to determine the range, angle, or velocity of objects. Sonar uses sound propagation to navigate, communicate with or detect objects on or under the surface of the water.

Manipulation[edit]

KUKA industrial robot operating in a foundry

Puma, one of the first industrial robots

Baxter, a modern and versatile industrial robot developed by Rodney Brooks

Lefty, first checker playing robot

Further information: Mobile manipulator

A definition of robotic manipulation has been provided by Matt Mason as: "manipulation refers to an agent's control of its environment through selective contact".[41]

Robots need to manipulate objects; pick up, modify, destroy, move or otherwise have an effect. Thus the functional end of a robot arm intended to make the effect (whether a hand, or tool) are often referred to as end effectors,[42] while the "arm" is referred to as a manipulator.[43] Most robot arms have replaceable end-effectors, each allowing them to perform some small range of tasks. Some have a fixed manipulator that cannot be replaced, while a few have one very general-purpose manipulator, for example, a humanoid hand.[44]

Mechanical grippers[edit]

One of the most common types of end-effectors are "grippers". In its simplest manifestation, it consists of just two fingers that can open and close to pick up and let go of a range of small objects. Fingers can, for example, be made of a chain with a metal wire running through it.[45] Hands that resemble and work more like a human hand include the Shadow Hand and the Robonaut hand.[46] Hands that are of a mid-level complexity include the Delft hand.[47][48] Mechanical grippers can come in various types, including friction and encompassing jaws. Friction jaws use all the force of the gripper to hold the object in place using friction. Encompassing jaws cradle the object in place, using less friction.

Suction end-effectors[edit]

Suction end-effectors, powered by vacuum generators, are very simple astrictive[49] devices that can hold very large loads provided the prehension surface is smooth enough to ensure suction.

Pick and place robots for electronic components and for large objects like car windscreens, often use very simple vacuum end-effectors.

Suction is a highly used type of end-effector in industry, in part because the natural compliance of soft suction end-effectors can enable a robot to be more robust in the presence of imperfect robotic perception. As an example: consider the case of a robot vision system that estimates the position of a water bottle but has 1 centimeter of error. While this may cause a rigid mechanical gripper to puncture the water bottle, the soft suction end-effector may just bend slightly and conform to the shape of the water bottle surface.

General purpose effectors[edit]

Some advanced robots are beginning to use fully humanoid hands, like the Shadow Hand, MANUS,[50] and the Schunk hand.[51] They have powerful robot dexterity intelligence (RDI), with as many as 20 degrees of freedom and hundreds of tactile sensors.[52]

Locomotion[edit]

Main articles: Robot locomotion and Mobile robot

Rolling robots[edit]

Segway in the Robot museum in Nagoya

For simplicity, most mobile robots have four wheels or a number of continuous tracks. Some researchers have tried to create more complex wheeled robots with only one or two wheels. These can have certain advantages such as greater efficiency and reduced parts, as well as allowing a robot to navigate in confined places that a four-wheeled robot would not be able to.

Two-wheeled balancing robots[edit]

Balancing robots generally use a gyroscope to detect how much a robot is falling and then drive the wheels proportionally in the same direction, to counterbalance the fall at hundreds of times per second, based on the dynamics of an inverted pendulum.[53] Many different balancing robots have been designed.[54] While the Segway is not commonly thought of as a robot, it can be thought of as a component of a robot, when used as such Segway refer to them as RMP (Robotic Mobility Platform). An example of this use has been as NASA's Robonaut that has been mounted on a Segway.[55]

One-wheeled balancing robots[edit]

Main article: Self-balancing unicycle

A one-wheeled balancing robot is an extension of a two-wheeled balancing robot so that it can move in any 2D direction using a round ball as its only wheel. Several one-wheeled balancing robots have been designed recently, such as Carnegie Mellon University's "Ballbot" which is the approximate height and width of a person, and Tohoku Gakuin University's "BallIP".[56] Because of the long, thin shape and ability to maneuver in tight spaces, they have the potential to function better than other robots in environments with people.[57]

Spherical orb robots[edit]

Main article: Spherical robot

Several attempts have been made in robots that are completely inside a spherical ball, either by spinning a weight inside the ball,[58][59] or by rotating the outer shells of the sphere.[60][61] These have also been referred to as an orb bot[62] or a ball bot.[63][64]

Six-wheeled robots[edit]

Using six wheels instead of four wheels can give better traction or grip in outdoor terrain such as on rocky dirt or grass.

Tracked robots[edit]

TALON military robots used by the United States Army

Tank tracks provide even more traction than a six-wheeled robot. Tracked wheels behave as if they were made of hundreds of wheels, therefore are very common for outdoor and military robots, where the robot must drive on very rough terrain. However, they are difficult to use indoors such as on carpets and smooth floors. Examples include NASA's Urban Robot "Urbie".[65]

Walking robots[edit]

Further information: Mantis the spider robot

Walking is a difficult and dynamic problem to solve. Several robots have been made which can walk reliably on two legs, however, none have yet been made which are as robust as a human. There has been much study on human-inspired walking, such as AMBER lab which was established in 2008 by the Mechanical Engineering Department at Texas A&M University.[66] Many other robots have been built that walk on more than two legs, due to these robots being significantly easier to construct.[67][68] Walking robots can be used for uneven terrains, which would provide better mobility and energy efficiency than other locomotion methods. Typically, robots on two legs can walk well on flat floors and can occasionally walk up stairs. None can walk over rocky, uneven terrain. Some of the methods which have been tried are:

ZMP technique[edit]

Main article: Zero moment point

The zero moment point (ZMP) is the algorithm used by robots such as Honda's ASIMO. The robot's onboard computer tries to keep the total inertial forces (the combination of Earth's gravity and the acceleration and deceleration of walking), exactly opposed by the floor reaction force (the force of the floor pushing back on the robot's foot). In this way, the two forces cancel out, leaving no moment (force causing the robot to rotate and fall over).[69] However, this is not exactly how a human walks, and the difference is obvious to human observers, some of whom have pointed out that ASIMO walks as if it needs the lavatory.[70][71][72] ASIMO's walking algorithm is not static, and some dynamic balancing is used (see below). However, it still requires a smooth surface to walk on.

Hopping[edit]

Several robots, built in the 1980s by Marc Raibert at the MIT Leg Laboratory, successfully demonstrated very dynamic walking. Initially, a robot with only one leg, and a very small foot could stay upright simply by hopping. The movement is the same as that of a person on a pogo stick. As the robot falls to one side, it would jump slightly in that direction, in order to catch itself.[73] Soon, the algorithm was generalised to two and four legs. A bipedal robot was demonstrated running and even performing somersaults.[74] A quadruped was also demonstrated which could trot, run, pace, and bound.[75] For a full list of these robots, see the MIT Leg Lab Robots page.[76]

Dynamic balancing (controlled falling)[edit]

A more advanced way for a robot to walk is by using a dynamic balancing algorithm, which is potentially more robust than the Zero Moment Point technique, as it constantly monitors the robot's motion, and places the feet in order to maintain stability.[77] This technique was recently demonstrated by Anybots' Dexter Robot,[78] which is so stable, it can even jump.[79] Another example is the TU Delft Flame.

Passive dynamics[edit]

Main article: Passive dynamics

Perhaps the most promising approach uses passive dynamics where the momentum of swinging limbs is used for greater efficiency. It has been shown that totally unpowered humanoid mechanisms can walk down a gentle slope, using only gravity to propel themselves. Using this technique, a robot need only supply a small amount of motor power to walk along a flat surface or a little more to walk up a hill. This technique promises to make walking robots at least ten times more efficient than ZMP walkers, like ASIMO.[80][81]

Other methods of locomotion[edit]

Flying[edit]

A modern passenger airliner is essentially a flying robot, with two humans to manage it. The autopilot can control the plane for each stage of the journey, including takeoff, normal flight, and even landing.[82] Other flying robots are uninhabited and are known as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). They can be smaller and lighter without a human pilot on board, and fly into dangerous territory for military surveillance missions. Some can even fire on targets under command. UAVs are also being developed which can fire on targets automatically, without the need for a command from a human. Other flying robots include cruise missiles, the Entomopter, and the Epson micro helicopter robot. Robots such as the Air Penguin, Air Ray, and Air Jelly have lighter-than-air bodies, are propelled by paddles, and are guided by sonar.

Biomimetic flying robots (BFRs)[edit]

A flapping wing BFR generating lift and thrust.

BFRs take inspiration from flying mammals, birds, or insects. BFRs can have flapping wings, which generate the lift and thrust, or they can be propeller actuated. BFRs with flapping wings have increased stroke efficiencies, increased maneuverability, and reduced energy consumption in comparison to propeller actuated BFRs.[83] Mammal and bird inspired BFRs share similar flight characteristics and design considerations. For instance, both mammal and bird inspired BFRs minimize edge fluttering and pressure-induced wingtip curl by increasing the rigidity of the wing edge and wingtips. Mammal and insect inspired BFRs can be impact resistant, making them useful in cluttered environments.

Mammal inspired BFRs typically take inspiration from bats, but the flying squirrel has also inspired a prototype.[84] Examples of bat inspired BFRs include Bat Bot[85] and the DALER.[86] Mammal inspired BFRs can be designed to be multi-modal; therefore, they're capable of both flight and terrestrial movement. To reduce the impact of landing, shock absorbers can be implemented along the wings.[86] Alternatively, the BFR can pitch up and increase the amount of drag it experiences.[84] By increasing the drag force, the BFR will decelerate and minimize the impact upon grounding. Different land gait patterns can also be implemented.[84]

Dragonfly inspired BFR.

Bird inspired BFRs can take inspiration from raptors, gulls, and everything in-between. Bird inspired BFRs can be feathered to increase the angle of attack range over which the prototype can operate before stalling.[87] The wings of bird inspired BFRs allow for in-plane deformation, and the in-plane wing deformation can be adjusted to maximize flight efficiency depending on the flight gait.[87] An example of a raptor inspired BFR is the prototype by Savastano et al.[88] The prototype has fully deformable flapping wings and is capable of carrying a payload of up to 0.8 kg while performing a parabolic climb, steep descent, and rapid recovery. The gull inspired prototype by Grant et al. accurately mimics the elbow and wrist rotation of gulls, and they find that lift generation is maximized when the elbow and wrist deformations are opposite but equal.[89]

Insect inspired BFRs typically take inspiration from beetles or dragonflies. An example of a beetle inspired BFR is the prototype by Phan and Park,[90] and a dragonfly inspired BFR is the prototype by Hu et al.[91] The flapping frequency of insect inspired BFRs are much higher than those of other BFRs; this is because of the aerodynamics of insect flight.[92] Insect inspired BFRs are much smaller than those inspired by mammals or birds, so they are more suitable for dense environments.

Biologically-inspired flying robots[edit]

Visualization of entomopter flying on Mars (NASA)

A class of robots that are biologically inspired, but which do not attempt to mimic biology, are creations such as the Entomopter. Funded by DARPA, NASA, the United States Air Force, and the Georgia Tech Research Institute and patented by Prof. Robert C. Michelson for covert terrestrial missions as well as flight in the lower Mars atmosphere, the Entomopter flight propulsion system uses low Reynolds number wings similar to those of the hawk moth (Manduca sexta), but flaps them in a non-traditional "opposed x-wing fashion" while "blowing" the surface to enhance lift based on the Coandă effect as well as to control vehicle attitude and direction. Waste gas from the propulsion system not only facilitates the blown wing aerodynamics, but also serves to create ultrasonic emissions like that of a Bat for obstacle avoidance. The Entomopter and other biologically-inspired robots leverage features of biological systems, but do not attempt to create mechanical analogs.

Snaking[edit]

Two robot snakes. The left one has 64 motors (with 2 degrees of freedom per segment), the right one 10.

Several snake robots have been successfully developed. Mimicking the way real snakes move, these robots can navigate very confined spaces, meaning they may one day be used to search for people trapped in collapsed buildings.[93] The Japanese ACM-R5 snake robot[94] can even navigate both on land and in water.[95]

Skating[edit]

A small number of skating robots have been developed, one of which is a multi-mode walking and skating device. It has four legs, with unpowered wheels, which can either step or roll.[96] Another robot, Plen, can use a miniature skateboard or roller-skates, and skate across a desktop.[97]

Capuchin, a climbing robot

Climbing[edit]

Several different approaches have been used to develop robots that have the ability to climb vertical surfaces. One approach mimics the movements of a human climber on a wall with protrusions; adjusting the center of mass and moving each limb in turn to gain leverage. An example of this is Capuchin,[98] built by Ruixiang Zhang at Stanford University, California. Another approach uses the specialized toe pad method of wall-climbing geckoes, which can run on smooth surfaces such as vertical glass. Examples of this approach include Wallbot[99] and Stickybot.[100]

China's Technology Daily reported on 15 November 2008, that Li Hiu Yeung and his research group of New Concept Aircraft (Zhuhai) Co., Ltd. had successfully developed a bionic gecko robot named "Speedy Freelander". According to Yeung, the gecko robot could rapidly climb up and down a variety of building walls, navigate through ground and wall fissures, and walk upside-down on the ceiling. It was also able to adapt to the surfaces of smooth glass, rough, sticky or dusty walls as well as various types of metallic materials. It could also identify and circumvent obstacles automatically. Its flexibility and speed were comparable to a natural gecko. A third approach is to mimic the motion of a snake climbing a pole.[40]

Swimming (Piscine)[edit]

It is calculated that when swimming some fish can achieve a propulsive efficiency greater than 90%.[101] Furthermore, they can accelerate and maneuver far better than any man-made boat or submarine, and produce less noise and water disturbance. Therefore, many researchers studying underwater robots would like to copy this type of locomotion.[102] Notable examples are the Essex University Computer Science Robotic Fish G9,[103] and the Robot Tuna built by the Institute of Field Robotics, to analyze and mathematically model thunniform motion.[104] The Aqua Penguin,[105] designed and built by Festo of Germany, copies the streamlined shape and propulsion by front "flippers" of penguins. Festo have also built the Aqua Ray and Aqua Jelly, which emulate the locomotion of manta ray, and jellyfish, respectively.

Robotic Fish: iSplash-II

In 2014, iSplash-II was developed by PhD student Richard James Clapham and Prof. Huosheng Hu at Essex University. It was the first robotic fish capable of outperforming real carangiform fish in terms of average maximum velocity (measured in body lengths/ second) and endurance, the duration that top speed is maintained.[106] This build attained swimming speeds of 11.6BL/s (i.e. 3.7 m/s).[107] The first build, iSplash-I (2014) was the first robotic platform to apply a full-body length carangiform swimming motion which was found to increase swimming speed by 27% over the traditional approach of a posterior confined waveform.[108]

Sailing[edit]

The autonomous sailboat robot Vaimos

Sailboat robots have also been developed in order to make measurements at the surface of the ocean. A typical sailboat robot is Vaimos[109] built by IFREMER and ENSTA-Bretagne. Since the propulsion of sailboat robots uses the wind, the energy of the batteries is only used for the computer, for the communication and for the actuators (to tune the rudder and the sail). If the robot is equipped with solar panels, the robot could theoretically navigate forever. The two main competitions of sailboat robots are WRSC, which takes place every year in Europe, and Sailbot.

Control[edit]

Puppet Magnus, a robot-manipulated marionette with complex control systems

Experimental planar robot arm and sensor-based, open-architecture robot controller developed at Sunderland University, UK in 2000

RuBot II can manually resolve Rubik's cubes.

Further information: Control systemThe mechanical structure of a robot must be controlled to perform tasks.[110] The control of a robot involves three distinct phases – perception, processing, and action (robotic paradigms).[111] Sensors give information about the environment or the robot itself (e.g. the position of its joints or its end effector). This information is then processed to be stored or transmitted and to calculate the appropriate signals to the actuators (motors), which move the mechanical structure to achieve the required co-ordinated motion or force actions.

The processing phase can range in complexity. At a reactive level, it may translate raw sensor information directly into actuator commands (e.g. firing motor power electronic gates based directly upon encoder feedback signals to achieve the required torque/velocity of the shaft). Sensor fusion and internal models may first be used to estimate parameters of interest (e.g. the position of the robot's gripper) from noisy sensor data. An immediate task (such as moving the gripper in a certain direction until an object is detected with a proximity sensor) is sometimes inferred from these estimates. Techniques from control theory are generally used to convert the higher-level tasks into individual commands that drive the actuators, most often using kinematic and dynamic models of the mechanical structure.[110][111][112]

At longer time scales or with more sophisticated tasks, the robot may need to build and reason with a "cognitive" model. Cognitive models try to represent the robot, the world, and how the two interact. Pattern recognition and computer vision can be used to track objects.[110] Mapping techniques can be used to build maps of the world. Finally, motion planning and other artificial intelligence techniques may be used to figure out how to act. For example, a planner may figure out how to achieve a task without hitting obstacles, falling over, etc.

Modern commercial robotic control systems are highly complex, integrate multiple sensors and effectors, have many interacting degrees-of-freedom (DOF) and require operator interfaces, programming tools and real-time capabilities.[111] They are oftentimes interconnected to wider communication networks and in many cases are now both IoT-enabled and mobile.[113] Progress towards open architecture, layered, user-friendly and 'intelligent' sensor-based interconnected robots has emerged from earlier concepts related to Flexible Manufacturing Systems (FMS), and several 'open or 'hybrid' reference architectures exist which assist developers of robot control software and hardware to move beyond traditional, earlier notions of 'closed' robot control systems have been proposed.[112] Open architecture controllers are said to be better able to meet the growing requirements of a wide range of robot users, including system developers, end users and research scientists, and are better positioned to deliver the advanced robotic concepts related to Industry 4.0.[112] In addition to utilizing many established features of robot controllers, such as position, velocity and force control of end effectors, they also enable IoT interconnection and the implementation of more advanced sensor fusion and control techniques, including adaptive control, Fuzzy control and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)-based control.[112] When implemented in real-time, such techniques can potentially improve the stability and performance of robots operating in unknown or uncertain environments by enabling the control systems to learn and adapt to environmental changes.[114] There are several examples of reference architectures for robot controllers, and also examples of successful implementations of actual robot controllers developed from them. One example of a generic reference architecture and associated interconnected, open-architecture robot and controller implementation was developed by Michael Short and colleagues at the University of Sunderland in the UK in 2000 (pictured right).[112] The robot was used in a number of research and development studies, including prototype implementation of novel advanced and intelligent control and environment mapping methods in real-time.[114][115]

Automation[edit]

TOPIO, a humanoid robot, played ping pong at Tokyo IREX 2009.[116]

Control systems may also have varying levels of autonomy.

Direct interaction is used for haptic or teleoperated devices, and the human has nearly complete control over the robot's motion.

Operator-assist modes have the operator commanding medium-to-high-level tasks, with the robot automatically figuring out how to achieve them.[117]

An autonomous robot may go without human interaction for extended periods of time . Higher levels of autonomy do not necessarily require more complex cognitive capabilities. For example, robots in assembly plants are completely autonomous but operate in a fixed pattern.

Another classification takes into account the interaction between human control and the machine motions.

Teleoperation. A human controls each movement, each machine actuator change is specified by the operator.

Supervisory. A human specifies general moves or position changes and the machine decides specific movements of its actuators.

Task-level autonomy. The operator specifies only the task and the robot manages itself to complete it.

Full autonomy. The machine will create and complete all its tasks without human interaction.

Vision[edit]

Main article: Computer vision

Computer vision is the science and technology of machines that see. As a scientific discipline, computer vision is concerned with the theory behind artificial systems that extract information from images. The image data can take many forms, such as video sequences and views from cameras.

In most practical computer vision applications, the computers are pre-programmed to solve a particular task, but methods based on learning are now becoming increasingly common.

Computer vision systems rely on image sensors that detect electromagnetic radiation which is typically in the form of either visible light or infra-red light. The sensors are designed using solid-state physics. The process by which light propagates and reflects off surfaces is explained using optics. Sophisticated image sensors even require quantum mechanics to provide a complete understanding of the image formation process. Robots can also be equipped with multiple vision sensors to be better able to compute the sense of depth in the environment. Like human eyes, robots' "eyes" must also be able to focus on a particular area of interest, and also adjust to variations in light intensities.

There is a subfield within computer vision where artificial systems are designed to mimic the processing and behavior of biological system, at different levels of complexity. Also, some of the learning-based methods developed within computer vision have a background in biology.

Environmental interaction and navigation[edit]

Main articles: Robotic mapping and Robotic navigation

Radar, GPS, and lidar, are all combined to provide proper navigation and obstacle avoidance (vehicle developed for 2007 DARPA Urban Challenge).

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (July 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Though a significant percentage of robots in commission today are either human controlled or operate in a static environment, there is an increasing interest in robots that can operate autonomously in a dynamic environment. These robots require some combination of navigation hardware and software in order to traverse their environment. In particular, unforeseen events (e.g. people and other obstacles that are not stationary) can cause problems or collisions. Some highly advanced robots such as ASIMO and Meinü robot have particularly good robot navigation hardware and software. Also, self-controlled cars, Ernst Dickmanns' driverless car, and the entries in the DARPA Grand Challenge, are capable of sensing the environment well and subsequently making navigational decisions based on this information, including by a swarm of autonomous robots.[118] Most of these robots employ a GPS navigation device with waypoints, along with radar, sometimes combined with other sensory data such as lidar, video cameras, and inertial guidance systems for better navigation between waypoints.

Human-robot interaction[edit]

Main article: Human-robot interaction

Kismet can produce a range of facial expressions.

The state of the art in sensory intelligence for robots will have to progress through several orders of magnitude if we want the robots working in our homes to go beyond vacuum-cleaning the floors. If robots are to work effectively in homes and other non-industrial environments, the way they are instructed to perform their jobs, and especially how they will be told to stop will be of critical importance. The people who interact with them may have little or no training in robotics, and so any interface will need to be extremely intuitive. Science fiction authors also typically assume that robots will eventually be capable of communicating with humans through speech, gestures, and facial expressions, rather than a command-line interface. Although speech would be the most natural way for the human to communicate, it is unnatural for the robot. It will probably be a long time before robots interact as naturally as the fictional C-3PO, or Data of Star Trek, Next Generation. Even though the current state of robotics cannot meet the standards of these robots from science-fiction, robotic media characters (e.g., Wall-E, R2-D2) can elicit audience sympathies that increase people's willingness to accept actual robots in the future.[119] Acceptance of social robots is also likely to increase if people can meet a social robot under appropriate conditions. Studies have shown that interacting with a robot by looking at, touching, or even imagining interacting with the robot can reduce negative feelings that some people have about robots before interacting with them.[120] However, if pre-existing negative sentiments are especially strong, interacting with a robot can increase those negative feelings towards robots.[120]

Speech recognition[edit]

Main article: Speech recognition

Interpreting the continuous flow of sounds coming from a human, in real time, is a difficult task for a computer, mostly because of the great variability of speech.[121] The same word, spoken by the same person may sound different depending on local acoustics, volume, the previous word, whether or not the speaker has a cold, etc.. It becomes even harder when the speaker has a different accent.[122] Nevertheless, great strides have been made in the field since Davis, Biddulph, and Balashek designed the first "voice input system" which recognized "ten digits spoken by a single user with 100% accuracy" in 1952.[123] Currently, the best systems can recognize continuous, natural speech, up to 160 words per minute, with an accuracy of 95%.[124] With the help of artificial intelligence, machines nowadays can use people's voice to identify their emotions such as satisfied or angry.[125]

Robotic voice[edit]

Other hurdles exist when allowing the robot to use voice for interacting with humans. For social reasons, synthetic voice proves suboptimal as a communication medium,[126] making it necessary to develop the emotional component of robotic voice through various techniques.[127][128] An advantage of diphonic branching is the emotion that the robot is programmed to project, can be carried on the voice tape, or phoneme, already pre-programmed onto the voice media. One of the earliest examples is a teaching robot named Leachim developed in 1974 by Michael J. Freeman.[129][130] Leachim was able to convert digital memory to rudimentary verbal speech on pre-recorded computer discs.[131] It was programmed to teach students in The Bronx, New York.[131]

Gestures[edit]

Further information: Gesture recognition

One can imagine, in the future, explaining to a robot chef how to make a pastry, or asking directions from a robot police officer. In both of these cases, making hand gestures would aid the verbal descriptions. In the first case, the robot would be recognizing gestures made by the human, and perhaps repeating them for confirmation. In the second case, the robot police officer would gesture to indicate "down the road, then turn right". It is likely that gestures will make up a part of the interaction between humans and robots.[132] A great many systems have been developed to recognize human hand gestures.[133]

Facial expression[edit]

Further information: Emotion recognition

Facial expressions can provide rapid feedback on the progress of a dialog between two humans, and soon may be able to do the same for humans and robots. Robotic faces have been constructed by Hanson Robotics using their elastic polymer called Frubber, allowing a large number of facial expressions due to the elasticity of the rubber facial coating and embedded subsurface motors (servos).[134] The coating and servos are built on a metal skull. A robot should know how to approach a human, judging by their facial expression and body language. Whether the person is happy, frightened, or crazy-looking affects the type of interaction expected of the robot. Likewise, robots like Kismet and the more recent addition, Nexi[135] can produce a range of facial expressions, allowing it to have meaningful social exchanges with humans.[136]

Artificial emotions[edit]

Artificial emotions can also be generated, composed of a sequence of facial expressions or gestures. As can be seen from the movie Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within, the programming of these artificial emotions is complex and requires a large amount of human observation. To simplify this programming in the movie, presets were created together with a special software program. This decreased the amount of time needed to make the film. These presets could possibly be transferred for use in real-life robots. An example of a robot with artificial emotions is Robin the Robot developed by an Armenian IT company Expper Technologies, which uses AI-based peer-to-peer interaction. Its main task is achieving emotional well-being, i.e. overcome stress and anxiety. Robin was trained to analyze facial expressions and use his face to display his emotions given the context. The robot has been tested by kids in US clinics, and observations show that Robin increased the appetite and cheerfulness of children after meeting and talking.[137]

Personality[edit]

Many of the robots of science fiction have a personality, something which may or may not be desirable in the commercial robots of the future.[138] Nevertheless, researchers are trying to create robots which appear to have a personality:[139][140] i.e. they use sounds, facial expressions, and body language to try to convey an internal state, which may be joy, sadness, or fear. One commercial example is Pleo, a toy robot dinosaur, which can exhibit several apparent emotions.[141]

Proxemics[edit]

Proxemics is the study of personal space, and HRI systems may try to model and work with its concepts for human interactions.

Research robotics[edit]

Further information: Areas of robotics

Two Jet Propulsion Laboratory engineers stand with three vehicles, providing a size comparison of three generations of Mars rovers. Front and center is the flight spare for the first Mars rover, Sojourner, which landed on Mars in 1997 as part of the Mars Pathfinder Project. On the left is a Mars Exploration Rover (MER) test vehicle that is a working sibling to Spirit and Opportunity, which landed on Mars in 2004. On the right is a test rover for the Mars Science Laboratory, which landed Curiosity on Mars in 2012. Sojourner is 65 cm (2.13 ft) long. The Mars Exploration Rovers (MER) are 1.6 m (5.2 ft) long. Curiosity on the right is 3 m (9.8 ft) long.

Much of the research in robotics focuses not on specific industrial tasks, but on investigations into new types of robots, alternative ways to think about or design robots, and new ways to manufacture them. Other investigations, such as MIT's cyberflora project, are almost wholly academic.

To describe the level of advancement of a robot, the term "Generation Robots" can be used. This term is coined by Professor Hans Moravec, Principal Research Scientist at the Carnegie Mellon University Robotics Institute in describing the near future evolution of robot technology. First-generation robots, Moravec predicted in 1997, should have an intellectual capacity comparable to perhaps a lizard and should become available by 2010. Because the first generation robot would be incapable of learning, however, Moravec predicts that the second generation robot would be an improvement over the first and become available by 2020, with the intelligence maybe comparable to that of a mouse. The third generation robot should have intelligence comparable to that of a monkey. Though fourth generation robots, robots with human intelligence, professor Moravec predicts, would become possible, he does not predict this happening before around 2040 or 2050.[142]

Dynamics and kinematics[edit]

Further information: Kinematics and Dynamics (mechanics)

External videos How the BB-8 Sphero Toy Works

The study of motion can be divided into kinematics and dynamics.[143] Direct kinematics or forward kinematics refers to the calculation of end effector position, orientation, velocity, and acceleration when the corresponding joint values are known. Inverse kinematics refers to the opposite case in which required joint values are calculated for given end effector values, as done in path planning. Some special aspects of kinematics include handling of redundancy (different possibilities of performing the same movement), collision avoidance, and singularity avoidance. Once all relevant positions, velocities, and accelerations have been calculated using kinematics, methods from the field of dynamics are used to study the effect of forces upon these movements. Direct dynamics refers to the calculation of accelerations in the robot once the applied forces are known. Direct dynamics is used in computer simulations of the robot. Inverse dynamics refers to the calculation of the actuator forces necessary to create a prescribed end-effector acceleration. This information can be used to improve the control algorithms of a robot.

In each area mentioned above, researchers strive to develop new concepts and strategies, improve existing ones, and improve the interaction between these areas. To do this, criteria for "optimal" performance and ways to optimize design, structure, and control of robots must be developed and implemented.

Open source robotics[edit]

Further information: Open source robotics

Open source robotics research seeks standards for defining, and methods for designing and building, robots so that they can easily be reproduced by anyone. Research includes legal and technical definitions; seeking out alternative tools and materials to reduce costs and simplify builds; and creating interfaces and standards for designs to work together. Human usability research also investigates how to best document builds through visual, text or video instructions.

Evolutionary robotics[edit]

Evolutionary robots is a methodology that uses evolutionary computation to help design robots, especially the body form, or motion and behavior controllers. In a similar way to natural evolution, a large population of robots is allowed to compete in some way, or their ability to perform a task is measured using a fitness function. Those that perform worst are removed from the population and replaced by a new set, which have new behaviors based on those of the winners. Over time the population improves, and eventually a satisfactory robot may appear. This happens without any direct programming of the robots by the researchers. Researchers use this method both to create better robots,[144] and to explore the nature of evolution.[145] Because the process often requires many generations of robots to be simulated,[146] this technique may be run entirely or mostly in simulation, using a robot simulator software package, then tested on real robots once the evolved algorithms are good enough.[147] Currently, there are about 10 million industrial robots toiling around the world, and Japan is the top country having high density of utilizing robots in its manufacturing industry.[citation needed]

Bionics and biomimetics[edit]

Bionics and biomimetics apply the physiology and methods of locomotion of animals to the design of robots. For example, the design of BionicKangaroo was based on the way kangaroos jump.

Swarm robotics[edit]

Swarm robotics is an approach to the coordination of multiple robots as a system which consist of large numbers of mostly simple physical robots. ″In a robot swarm, the collective behavior of the robots results from local interactions between the robots and between the robots and the environment in which they act.″* [118]

Quantum computing[edit]

There has been some research into whether robotics algorithms can be run more quickly on quantum computers than they can be run on digital computers. This area has been referred to as quantum robotics.[148]

Other research areas[edit]

Nanorobots.

Cobots (collaborative robots).[149]

Autonomous drones.

High temperature crucibles allow robotic systems to automate sample analysis.[150]

The main venues for robotics research are the international conferences ICRA and IROS.

Human factors[edit]

Education and training[edit]

Main article: Educational robotics

The SCORBOT-ER 4u educational robot

Robotics engineers design robots, maintain them, develop new applications for them, and conduct research to expand the potential of robotics.[151] Robots have become a popular educational tool in some middle and high schools, particularly in parts of the USA,[152] as well as in numerous youth summer camps, raising interest in programming, artificial intelligence, and robotics among students.

Employment[edit]

A robot technician builds small all-terrain robots (courtesy: MobileRobots, Inc.).

Main article: Technological unemployment

Robotics is an essential component in many modern manufacturing environments. As factories increase their use of robots, the number of robotics–related jobs grow and have been observed to be steadily rising.[153] The employment of robots in industries has increased productivity and efficiency savings and is typically seen as a long-term investment for benefactors. A study found that 47 percent of US jobs are at risk to automation "over some unspecified number of years".[154] These claims have been criticized on the ground that social policy, not AI, causes unemployment.[155] In a 2016 article in The Guardian, Stephen Hawking stated "The automation of factories has already decimated jobs in traditional manufacturing, and the rise of artificial intelligence is likely to extend this job destruction deep into the middle classes, with only the most caring, creative or supervisory roles remaining".[156]

According to a GlobalData September 2021 report, the robotics industry was worth $45bn in 2020, and by 2030, it will have grown at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 29% to $568bn, driving jobs in robotics and related industries.[157]

Occupational safety and health implications[edit]

Main article: Workplace robotics safety

A discussion paper drawn up by EU-OSHA highlights how the spread of robotics presents both opportunities and challenges for occupational safety and health (OSH).[158]

The greatest OSH benefits stemming from the wider use of robotics should be substitution for people working in unhealthy or dangerous environments. In space, defense, security, or the nuclear industry, but also in logistics, maintenance, and inspection, autonomous robots are particularly useful in replacing human workers performing dirty, dull or unsafe tasks, thus avoiding workers' exposures to hazardous agents and conditions and reducing physical, ergonomic and psychosocial risks. For example, robots are already used to perform repetitive and monotonous tasks, to handle radioactive material or to work in explosive atmospheres. In the future, many other highly repetitive, risky or unpleasant tasks will be performed by robots in a variety of sectors like agriculture, construction, transport, healthcare, firefighting or cleaning services.[159]

Moreover, there are certain skills to which humans will be better suited than machines for some time to come and the question is how to achieve the best combination of human and robot skills. The advantages of robotics include heavy-duty jobs with precision and repeatability, whereas the advantages of humans include creativity, decision-making, flexibility, and adaptability. This need to combine optimal skills has resulted in collaborative robots and humans sharing a common workspace more closely and led to the development of new approaches and standards to guarantee the safety of the "man-robot merger". Some European countries are including robotics in their national programs and trying to promote a safe and flexible cooperation between robots and operators to achieve better productivity. For example, the German Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA) organises annual workshops on the topic "human-robot collaboration".

In the future, cooperation between robots and humans will be diversified, with robots increasing their autonomy and human-robot collaboration reaching completely new forms. Current approaches and technical standards[160][161] aiming to protect employees from the risk of working with collaborative robots will have to be revised.

User experience[edit]

Great user experience predicts the needs, experiences, behaviors, language and cognitive abilities, and other factors of each user group. It then uses these insights to produce a product or solution that is ultimately useful and usable. For robots, user experience begins with an understanding of the robot's intended task and environment, while considering any possible social impact the robot may have on human operations and interactions with it.[162]

It defines that communication as the transmission of information through signals, which are elements perceived through touch, sound, smell and sight.[163] The author states that the signal connects the sender to the receiver and consists of three parts: the signal itself, what it refers to, and the interpreter. Body postures and gestures, facial expressions, hand and head movements are all part of nonverbal behavior and communication. Robots are no exception when it comes to human-robot interaction. Therefore, humans use their verbal and nonverbal behaviors to communicate their defining characteristics. Similarly, social robots need this coordination to perform human-like behaviors.

Careers[edit]

Robotics is an interdisciplinary field, combining primarily mechanical engineering and computer science but also drawing on electronic engineering and other subjects. The usual way to build a career in robotics is to complete an undergraduate degree in one of these established subjects, followed by a graduate (masters') degree in Robotics. Graduate degrees are typically joined by students coming from all of the contributing disciplines, and include familiarization of relevant undergraduate level subject matter from each of them, followed by specialist study in pure robotics topics which build upon them. As an interdisciplinary subject, robotics graduate programmes tend to be especially reliant on students working and learning together and sharing their knowledge and skills from their home discipline first degrees.

Robotics industry careers then follow the same pattern, with most roboticists working as part of interdisciplinary teams of specialists from these home disciplines followed by the robotics graduate degrees which enable them to work together. Workers typically continue to identify as members of their home disciplines who work in robotics, rather than as 'roboticists'. This structure is reinforced by the nature of some engineering professions, which grant chartered engineer status to members of home disciplines rather than to robotics as a whole.

Robotics careers are widely predicted to grow during in the 21st century, as robots replace more manual and intellectual human work. Workers who lose their jobs to robotics may be well-placed to retrain to build and maintain these robots, using their domain-specific knowledge and skills.

History[edit]

See also: History of robots

In 1948, Norbert Wiener formulated the principles of cybernetics, the basis of practical robotics.

Fully autonomous robots only appeared in the second half of the 20th century. The first digitally operated and programmable robot, the Unimate, was installed in 1961 to lift hot pieces of metal from a die casting machine and stack them. Commercial and industrial robots are widespread today and used to perform jobs more cheaply, more accurately, and more reliably than humans. They are also employed in some jobs that are too dirty, dangerous, or dull to be suitable for humans. Robots are widely used in manufacturing, assembly, packing and packaging, mining, transport, earth and space exploration, surgery,[164] weaponry, laboratory research, safety, and the mass production of consumer and industrial goods.[165]

Date

Significance

Robot name

Inventor

Third century B.C. and earlier

One of the earliest descriptions of automata appears in the Lie Zi text, on a much earlier encounter between King Mu of Zhou (1023–957 BC) and a mechanical engineer known as Yan Shi, an 'artificer'. The latter allegedly presented the king with a life-size, human-shaped figure of his mechanical handiwork.[166]

Yan Shi (Chinese: 偃师)

First century A.D. and earlier

Descriptions of more than 100 machines and automata, including a fire engine, a wind organ, a coin-operated machine, and a steam-powered engine, in Pneumatica and Automata by Heron of Alexandria

Ctesibius, Philo of Byzantium, Heron of Alexandria, and others

c. 420 B.C

A wooden, steam-propelled bird, which was able to fly

Flying pigeon

Archytas of Tarentum

1206

Created early humanoid automata, programmable automaton band[167]Robot band, hand-washing automaton,[168] automated moving peacocks[169]

Al-Jazari

1495

Designs for a humanoid robot

Mechanical Knight

Leonardo da Vinci

1560s

Clockwork Prayer that had machinal feet built under its robes that imitated walking. The robot's eyes, lips, and head all move in lifelike gestures.

Clockwork Prayer[citation needed]

Gianello della Torre

1738

Mechanical duck that was able to eat, flap its wings, and excrete

Digesting Duck

Jacques de Vaucanson

1898

Nikola Tesla demonstrates the first radio-controlled vessel.

Teleautomaton

Nikola Tesla

1903

Leonardo Torres Quevedo presented the Telekino at the Paris Academy of Science, a remote-control system with different states of operation.[170] He chose to conduct the initial test in a tricycle with an effective range of 20 to 30 meters, being the first example of a radio-controlled unmanned ground vehicle.[171][172]

Telekino

Leonardo Torres Quevedo

1912

Leonardo Torres Quevedo builds the first truly autonomous machine capable of playing chess. As opposed to the human-operated The Turk and Ajeeb, El Ajedrecista had an integrated automaton built to play chess without human guidance. It only played an endgame with three chess pieces, automatically moving a white king and a rook to checkmate the black king moved by a human opponent.[173][174]

El Ajedrecista

Leonardo Torres Quevedo

1914

In his paper Essays on Automatics published in 1914, Leonardo Torres Quevedo proposed a machine that makes "judgments" using sensors that capture information from the outside, parts that manipulate the outside world like arms, power sources such as batteries and air pressure, and most importantly, captured information and past information. It was defined as an organism that can control reactions in response to external information and adapt to changes in the environment to change its behavior.[175][176][177][178]

Essays on Automatics

Leonardo Torres Quevedo

1921

First fictional automatons called "robots" appear in the play R.U.R.

Rossum's Universal Robots

Karel Čapek

1930s

Humanoid robot exhibited at the 1939 and 1940 World's Fairs

Elektro

Westinghouse Electric Corporation

1946

First general-purpose digital computer

Whirlwind

Multiple people

1948

Simple robots exhibiting biological behaviors[179]

Elsie and Elmer

William Grey Walter

1956

First commercial robot, from the Unimation company founded by George Devol and Joseph Engelberger, based on Devol's patents[180]

Unimate

George Devol

1961

First installed industrial robot.

Unimate

George Devol

1967 to 1972

First full-scale humanoid intelligent robot,[181][182] and first android. Its limb control system allowed it to walk with the lower limbs, and to grip and transport objects with its hands, using tactile sensors. Its vision system allowed it to measure distances and directions to objects using external receptors, artificial eyes, and ears. And its conversation system allowed it to communicate with a person in Japanese, with an artificial mouth.[183][184][185]

WABOT-1

Waseda University

1973

First industrial robot with six electromechanically driven axes[186][187]

Famulus

KUKA Robot Group

1974

The world's first microcomputer controlled electric industrial robot, IRB 6 from ASEA, was delivered to a small mechanical engineering company in southern Sweden. The design of this robot had been patented in 1972.

IRB 6

ABB Robot Group

1975

Programmable universal manipulation arm, a Unimation product

PUMA

Victor Scheinman

1978

The first object-level robot programming language, RAPT, allowing robots to handle variations in object position, shape, and sensor noise.[188]

Freddy I and II

Patricia Ambler and Robin Popplestone

1983

First multitasking, the parallel programming language used for robot control. It was the Event Driven Language (EDL) on the IBM/Series/1 process computer, with the implementation of both inter-process communication (WAIT/POST) and mutual exclusion (ENQ/DEQ) mechanisms for robot control.[189]

ADRIEL I

Stevo Bozinovski and Mihail Sestakov

See also[edit]

Artificial intelligence

Autonomous robot

Cloud robotics

Cognitive robotics

Evolutionary robotics

Fog robotics

Glossary of robotics

Index of robotics articles

Mechatronics

Multi-agent system

Outline of robotics

Quantum robotics

Roboethics

Robot rights

Robotic art

Robotic governance

Self-reconfiguring modular robot

Soft robotics

Telerobotics

Notes[edit]

^ One database, developed by the United States Department of Energy, contains information on almost 500 existing robotic technologies.[14]

References[edit]

^ "German National Library". International classification system of the German National Library (GND). Archived from the original on 2020-08-19.

^ "Origami-Inspired Robots Can Sense, Analyze and Act in Challenging Environments". UCLA. Retrieved 2023-04-10.

^ Hunt, V. Daniel (1985). "Smart Robots". Smart Robots: A Handbook of Intelligent Robotic Systems. Chapman and Hall. p. 141. ISBN 978-1-4613-2533-8. Archived from the original on 2023-03-15. Retrieved 2018-12-04.

^ "Robot density rises globally". Robotic Industries Association. 8 February 2018. Archived from the original on 2020-11-23. Retrieved 2018-12-03.

^ Pinto, Jim (1 October 2003). "Fully automated factories approach reality". Automation World. Archived from the original on 2011-10-01. Retrieved 2018-12-03.

^ Pollock, Emily (7 June 2018). "Construction Robotics Industry Set to Double by 2023". engineering.com. Archived from the original on 2020-08-07. Retrieved 2018-12-03.

^ Grift, Tony E. (2004). "Agricultural Robotics". University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. Archived from the original on 2007-05-04. Retrieved 2018-12-03.

^ Thomas, Jim (1 November 2017). "How corporate giants are automating the farm". New Internationalist. Archived from the original on 2021-01-10. Retrieved 2018-12-03.

^ Arámbula Cosío, F.; Hibberd, R. D.; Davies, B. L. (July 1997). "Electromagnetic compatibility aspects of active robotic systems for surgery: the robotic prostatectomy experience". Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing. 35 (4): 436–440. doi:10.1007/BF02534105. ISSN 1741-0444. PMID 9327627. S2CID 21479700.

^ Kolodny, Lora (4 July 2017). "Robots are coming to a burger joint near you". CNBC. Archived from the original on 2020-12-05. Retrieved 2018-12-03.

^ Scott Kirsner (27 January 2023). "Robots in the kitchen? Local engineers are making it a reality". The Boston Globe.

^ Corner, Stuart (23 November 2017). "AI-driven robot makes 'perfect' flatbread". iothub.com.au. Archived from the original on 2020-11-24. Retrieved 2018-12-03.

^ Eyre, Michael (12 September 2014). "'Boris' the robot can load up dishwasher". BBC News. Archived from the original on 2020-12-21. Retrieved 2018-12-03.

^ "Technology Advanced Search". D&D Knowledge Management Information Tool. Archived from the original on 2020-08-06.

^ Dowling, Kevin. "Power Sources for Small Robots" (PDF). Carnegie Mellon University. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-11-25. Retrieved 2012-05-11.

^ Roozing, Wesley; Li, Zhibin; Tsagarakis, Nikos; Caldwell, Darwin (2016). "Design Optimisation and Control of Compliant Actuation Arrangements in Articulated Robots for Improved Energy Efficiency". IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 1 (2): 1110–1117. doi:10.1109/LRA.2016.2521926. S2CID 1940410.

^ Pratt, G.A.; Williamson, M.M. (1995). "Series elastic actuators". Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human-Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots. Vol. 1. pp. 399–406. doi:10.1109/IROS.1995.525827. hdl:1721.1/36966. ISBN 0-8186-7108-4. S2CID 17120394.

^ Furnémont, Raphaël; Mathijssen, Glenn; Verstraten, Tom; Lefeber, Dirk; Vanderborght, Bram (27 January 2016). "Bi-directional series-parallel elastic actuator and overlap of the actuation layers" (PDF). Bioinspiration & Biomimetics. 11 (1): 016005. Bibcode:2016BiBi...11a6005F. doi:10.1088/1748-3190/11/1/016005. PMID 26813145. S2CID 37031990. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-01. Retrieved 2023-03-15.

^ Pratt, Jerry E.; Krupp, Benjamin T. (2004). "Series Elastic Actuators for legged robots". In Gerhart, Grant R; Shoemaker, Chuck M; Gage, Douglas W (eds.). Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology VI. Vol. 5422. pp. 135–144. doi:10.1117/12.548000. S2CID 16586246.

^ Li, Zhibin; Tsagarakis, Nikos; Caldwell, Darwin (2013). "Walking Pattern Generation for a Humanoid Robot with Compliant Joints". Autonomous Robots. 35 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1007/s10514-013-9330-7. S2CID 624563.

^ Colgate, J. Edward (1988). The control of dynamically interacting systems (Thesis). hdl:1721.1/14380.

^ Calanca, Andrea; Muradore, Riccardo; Fiorini, Paolo (November 2017). "Impedance control of series elastic actuators: Passivity and acceleration-based control". Mechatronics. 47: 37–48. doi:10.1016/j.mechatronics.2017.08.010.

^ Tosun, Fatih Emre; Patoglu, Volkan (June 2020). "Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for the Passivity of Impedance Rendering With Velocity-Sourced Series Elastic Actuation". IEEE Transactions on Robotics. 36 (3): 757–772. doi:10.1109/TRO.2019.2962332. S2CID 212907787.

^ www.imagesco.com, Images SI Inc -. "Air Muscle actuators, going further, page 6". Archived from the original on 2020-11-14. Retrieved 2010-05-24.

^ "Air Muscles". Shadow Robot. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27.

^ Tondu, Bertrand (2012). "Modelling of the McKibben artificial muscle: A review". Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures. 23 (3): 225–253. doi:10.1177/1045389X11435435. S2CID 136854390.

^ "TALKING ELECTRONICS Nitinol Page-1". Talkingelectronics.com. Archived from the original on 2020-01-18. Retrieved 2010-11-27.

^ "lf205, Hardware: Building a Linux-controlled walking robot". Ibiblio.org. 1 November 2001. Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2010-11-27.

^ "WW-EAP and Artificial Muscles". Eap.jpl.nasa.gov. Archived from the original on 2017-01-20. Retrieved 2010-11-27.

^ "Empa – a117-2-eap". Empa.ch. Archived from the original on 2015-09-24. Retrieved 2010-11-27.

^ "Electroactive Polymers (EAP) as Artificial Muscles (EPAM) for Robot Applications". Hizook. Archived from the original on 2020-08-06. Retrieved 2010-11-27.

^ "Piezo LEGS – -09-26". Archived from the original on 2008-01-30. Retrieved 2007-10-28.

^ "Squiggle Motors: Overview". Archived from the original on 2007-10-07. Retrieved 2007-10-08.

^ Nishibori; et al. (2003). "Robot Hand with Fingers Using Vibration-Type Ultrasonic Motors (Driving Characteristics)". Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics. 15 (6): 588–595. doi:10.20965/jrm.2003.p0588.

^ Otake, Mihoko; Kagami, Yoshiharu; Ishikawa, Kohei; Inaba, Masayuki; Inoue, Hirochika (6 April 2001). Wilson, Alan R.; Asanuma, Hiroshi (eds.). "Shape design of gel robots made of electroactive polymer gel". Smart Materials. 4234: 194–202. Bibcode:2001SPIE.4234..194O. doi:10.1117/12.424407. S2CID 30357330.

^ Madden, John D. (16 November 2007). "Mobile Robots: Motor Challenges and Materials Solutions". Science. 318 (5853): 1094–1097. Bibcode:2007Sci...318.1094M. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.395.4635. doi:10.1126/science.1146351. PMID 18006737. S2CID 52827127.

^ "Syntouch LLC: BioTac(R) Biomimetic Tactile Sensor Array". Archived from the original on 2009-10-03. Retrieved 2009-08-10.

^ Wettels, Nicholas; Santos, Veronica J.; Johansson, Roland S.; Loeb, Gerald E. (January 2008). "Biomimetic Tactile Sensor Array". Advanced Robotics. 22 (8): 829–849. doi:10.1163/156855308X314533. S2CID 4594917.

^ "What is The SmartHand?". SmartHand Project. Archived from the original on 2015-03-03. Retrieved 2011-02-04.

^ a b Arreguin, Juan (2008). Automation and Robotics. Vienna, Austria: I-Tech and Publishing.

^ Mason, Matthew T. (2001). Mechanics of Robotic Manipulation. doi:10.7551/mitpress/4527.001.0001. ISBN 9780262256629. S2CID 5260407.

^ "What is a robotic end-effector?". ATI Industrial Automation. 2007. Archived from the original on 2020-12-17. Retrieved 2007-10-16.

^ Crane, Carl D.; Joseph Duffy (1998). Kinematic Analysis of Robot Manipulators. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-57063-3. Archived from the original on 2020-04-02. Retrieved 2007-10-16.

^ G.J. Monkman, S. Hesse, R. Steinmann & H. Schunk (2007). Robot Grippers. Berlin: Wiley

^ "Annotated Mythbusters: Episode 78: Ninja Myths – Walking on Water, Catching a Sword, Catching an Arrow". Archived from the original on 2020-11-12. Retrieved 2010-02-13. (Discovery Channel's Mythbusters making mechanical gripper from the chain and metal wire)

^ "Robonaut hand". Archived from the original on 2020-02-22. Retrieved 2011-11-21.

^ "Delft hand". TU Delft. Archived from the original on 2012-02-03. Retrieved 2011-11-21.

^ M&C. "TU Delft ontwikkelt goedkope, voorzichtige robothand". Archived from the original on 2017-03-13. Retrieved 2011-11-21.

^ "astrictive definition – English definition dictionary – Reverso". Archived from the original on 2020-04-30. Retrieved 2008-01-06.

^ Tijsma, H.A.; Liefhebber, F.; Herder, J.L. (2005). "Evaluation of New User Interface Features for the MANUS Robot Arm". 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005. pp. 258–263. doi:10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501097. ISBN 0-7803-9003-2. S2CID 36445389.

^ Allcock, Andrew (2006). "Anthropomorphic hand is almost human". Machinery. Archived from the original on 2007-09-28. Retrieved 2007-10-17.

^ "Welcome". Archived (PDF) from the original on 2013-05-10. Retrieved 2007-10-28.

^ "T.O.B.B". Mtoussaint.de. Archived from the original on 2020-07-08. Retrieved 2010-11-27.

^ "nBot, a two wheel balancing robot". Geology.heroy.smu.edu. Archived from the original on 2021-01-26. Retrieved 2010-11-27.

^ "ROBONAUT Activity Report". NASA. 2004. Archived from the original on 2007-08-20. Retrieved 2007-10-20.

^ Guizzo, Erico (29 April 2010). "A Robot That Balances on a Ball". IEEE Spectrum. Archived from the original on 2023-02-10. Retrieved 2023-03-15.

^ "Carnegie Mellon Researchers Develop New Type of Mobile Robot That Balances and Moves on a Ball Instead of Legs or Wheels" (Press release). Carnegie Mellon. 9 August 2006. Archived from the original on 2007-06-09. Retrieved 2007-10-20.

^ "Spherical Robot Can Climb Over Obstacles". BotJunkie. Archived from the original on 2012-03-28. Retrieved 2010-11-27.

^ "Rotundus". Rotundus.se. Archived from the original on 2011-08-26. Retrieved 2010-11-27.

^ "OrbSwarm Gets A Brain". BotJunkie. 11 July 2007. Archived from the original on 2012-05-16. Retrieved 2010-11-27.

^ "Rolling Orbital Bluetooth Operated Thing". BotJunkie. Archived from the original on 2012-03-28. Retrieved 2010-11-27.

^ "Swarm". Orbswarm.com. Archived from the original on 2021-01-26. Retrieved 2010-11-27.

^ "The Ball Bot : Johnnytronic@Sun". Blogs.sun.com. Archived from the original on 2011-08-24. Retrieved 2010-11-27.

^ "Senior Design Projects | College of Engineering & Applied Science| University of Colorado at Boulder". Engineering.colorado.edu. 30 April 2008. Archived from the original on 2011-07-23. Retrieved 2010-11-27.

^ "JPL Robotics: System: Commercial Rovers". Archived from the original on 2006-06-15.

^ "AMBER Lab". Archived from the original on 2020-11-25. Retrieved 2012-01-23.

^ "Micromagic Systems Robotics Lab". Archived from the original on 2017-06-01. Retrieved 2009-04-29.

^ "AMRU-5 hexapod robot" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-08-17. Retrieved 2009-04-29.

^ "Achieving Stable Walking". Honda Worldwide. Archived from the original on 2011-11-08. Retrieved 2007-10-22.

^ "Funny Walk". Pooter Geek. 28 December 2004. Archived from the original on 2011-09-28. Retrieved 2007-10-22.

^ "ASIMO's Pimp Shuffle". Popular Science. 9 January 2007. Archived from the original on 2011-07-24. Retrieved 2007-10-22.

^ "Robot Shows Prime Minister How to Loosen Up > > A drunk robot?". The Temple of VTEC – Honda and Acura Enthusiasts Online Forums. 25 August 2003. Archived from the original on 2020-04-30.

^ "3D One-Leg Hopper (1983–1984)". MIT Leg Laboratory. Archived from the original on 2018-07-25. Retrieved 2007-10-22.

^ "3D Biped (1989–1995)". MIT Leg Laboratory. Archived from the original on 2011-09-26. Retrieved 2007-10-28.

^ "Quadruped (1984–1987)". MIT Leg Laboratory. Archived from the original on 2011-08-23. Retrieved 2007-10-28.

^ "MIT Leg Lab Robots- Main". Archived from the original on 2020-08-07. Retrieved 2007-10-28.

^ "About the Robots". Anybots. Archived from the original on 2007-09-09. Retrieved 2007-10-23.

^ "Anything, Anytime, Anywhere". Anybots. Archived from the original on 2007-10-27. Retrieved 2007-10-23.

^ "Dexter Jumps video". YouTube. 1 March 2007. Archived from the original on 2021-10-30. Retrieved 2007-10-23.

^ Collins, Steve; Ruina, Andy; Tedrake, Russ; Wisse, Martijn (18 February 2005). "Efficient Bipedal Robots Based on Passive-Dynamic Walkers". Science. 307 (5712): 1082–1085. Bibcode:2005Sci...307.1082C. doi:10.1126/science.1107799. PMID 15718465. S2CID 1315227.

^ Collins, S.H.; Ruina, A. (2005). "A Bipedal Walking Robot with Efficient and Human-Like Gait". Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. pp. 1983–1988. doi:10.1109/ROBOT.2005.1570404. ISBN 0-7803-8914-X. S2CID 15145353.

^ "Testing the Limits" (PDF). Boeing. p. 29. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2018-12-15. Retrieved 2008-04-09.

^ Zhang, Jun; Zhao, Ning; Qu, Feiyang (15 November 2022). "Bio-inspired flapping wing robots with foldable or deformable wings: a review". Bioinspiration & Biomimetics. 18 (1): 011002. doi:10.1088/1748-3190/ac9ef5. ISSN 1748-3182. PMID 36317380. S2CID 253246037.

^ a b c Shin, Won Dong; Park, Jaejun; Park, Hae-Won (1 September 2019). "Development and experiments of a bio-inspired robot with multi-mode in aerial and terrestrial locomotion". Bioinspiration & Biomimetics. 14 (5): 056009. Bibcode:2019BiBi...14e6009S. doi:10.1088/1748-3190/ab2ab7. ISSN 1748-3182. PMID 31212268. S2CID 195066183.

^ Ramezani, Alireza; Shi, Xichen; Chung, Soon-Jo; Hutchinson, Seth (May 2016). "Bat Bot (B2), a biologically inspired flying machine". 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Stockholm, Sweden: IEEE. pp. 3219–3226. doi:10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487491. ISBN 978-1-4673-8026-3. S2CID 8581750.

^ a b Daler, Ludovic; Mintchev, Stefano; Stefanini, Cesare; Floreano, Dario (19 January 2015). "A bioinspired multi-modal flying and walking robot". Bioinspiration & Biomimetics. 10 (1): 016005. Bibcode:2015BiBi...10a6005D. doi:10.1088/1748-3190/10/1/016005. ISSN 1748-3190. PMID 25599118. S2CID 11132948.

^ a b Kilian, Lukas; Shahid, Farzeen; Zhao, Jing-Shan; Nayeri, Christian Navid (1 July 2022). "Bioinspired morphing wings: mechanical design and wind tunnel experiments". Bioinspiration & Biomimetics. 17 (4): 046019. Bibcode:2022BiBi...17d6019K. doi:10.1088/1748-3190/ac72e1. ISSN 1748-3182. PMID 35609562. S2CID 249045806.

^ Savastano, E.; Perez-Sanchez, V.; Arrue, B.C.; Ollero, A. (July 2022). "High-Performance Morphing Wing for Large-Scale Bio-Inspired Unmanned Aerial Vehicles". IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 7 (3): 8076–8083. doi:10.1109/LRA.2022.3185389. ISSN 2377-3766. S2CID 250008824.

^ Grant, Daniel T.; Abdulrahim, Mujahid; Lind, Rick (June 2010). "Flight Dynamics of a Morphing Aircraft Utilizing Independent Multiple-Joint Wing Sweep". International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles. 2 (2): 91–106. doi:10.1260/1756-8293.2.2.91. ISSN 1756-8293. S2CID 110577545.

^ Phan, Hoang Vu; Park, Hoon Cheol (4 December 2020). "Mechanisms of collision recovery in flying beetles and flapping-wing robots". Science. 370 (6521): 1214–1219. Bibcode:2020Sci...370.1214P. doi:10.1126/science.abd3285. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 33273101. S2CID 227257247.

^ Hu, Zheng; McCauley, Raymond; Schaeffer, Steve; Deng, Xinyan (May 2009). "Aerodynamics of dragonfly flight and robotic design". 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. pp. 3061–3066. doi:10.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152760. ISBN 978-1-4244-2788-8. S2CID 12291429.

^ Balta, Miquel; Deb, Dipan; Taha, Haithem E (26 October 2021). "Flow visualization and force measurement of the clapping effect in bio-inspired flying robots". Bioinspiration & Biomimetics. 16 (6): 066020. Bibcode:2021BiBi...16f6020B. doi:10.1088/1748-3190/ac2b00. ISSN 1748-3182. PMID 34584023. S2CID 238217893.

^ Miller, Gavin. "Introduction". snakerobots.com. Archived from the original on 2011-08-17. Retrieved 2007-10-22.

^ "ACM-R5". Archived from the original on 2011-10-11.

^ "Swimming snake robot (commentary in Japanese)". Archived from the original on 2012-02-08. Retrieved 2007-10-28.

^ "Commercialized Quadruped Walking Vehicle "TITAN VII"". Hirose Fukushima Robotics Lab. Archived from the original on 2007-11-06. Retrieved 2007-10-23.

^ Pachal, Peter (23 January 2007). "Plen, the robot that skates across your desk". SCI FI Tech. Archived from the original on 2007-10-11.

^ Capuchin on YouTube

^ Wallbot on YouTube

^ Stanford University: Stickybot on YouTube

^ Sfakiotakis, M.; Lane, D.M.; Davies, J.B.C. (April 1999). "Review of fish swimming modes for aquatic locomotion". IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering. 24 (2): 237–252. Bibcode:1999IJOE...24..237S. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.459.8614. doi:10.1109/48.757275. S2CID 17226211.

^ Richard Mason. "What is the market for robot fish?". Archived from the original on 2009-07-04.

^ "Robotic fish powered by Gumstix PC and PIC". Human Centred Robotics Group at Essex University. Archived from the original on 2011-08-14. Retrieved 2007-10-25.

^ Witoon Juwarahawong. "Fish Robot". Institute of Field Robotics. Archived from the original on 2007-11-04. Retrieved 2007-10-25.

^ "Festo - AquaPenguin" – via YouTube.

^ "High-Speed Robotic Fish". iSplash-Robotics. Archived from the original on 2020-03-11. Retrieved 2017-01-07.

^ "iSplash-II: Realizing Fast Carangiform Swimming to Outperform a Real Fish" (PDF). Robotics Group at Essex University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-09-30. Retrieved 2015-09-29.

^ "iSplash-I: High Performance Swimming Motion of a Carangiform Robotic Fish with Full-Body Coordination" (PDF). Robotics Group at Essex University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-09-30. Retrieved 2015-09-29.

^ Jaulin, Luc; Le Bars, Fabrice (February 2013). "An Interval Approach for Stability Analysis: Application to Sailboat Robotics". IEEE Transactions on Robotics. 29 (1): 282–287. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.711.7180. doi:10.1109/TRO.2012.2217794. S2CID 4977937.

^ a b c Corke, Peter (2017). Robotics, Vision and Control. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics. Vol. 118. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54413-7. ISBN 978-3-319-54412-0. ISSN 1610-7438. Archived from the original on 2022-10-20. Retrieved 2023-03-15.

^ a b c Lee, K. S. Fu, Ralph Gonzalez, C S. G. (1987). Robotics: Control Sensing. Vis. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-026510-3. Archived from the original on 2023-03-15. Retrieved 2023-03-15.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

^ a b c d e Short, Michael; Burn, Kevin (1 April 2011). "A generic controller architecture for intelligent robotic systems". Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. 27 (2): 292–305. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2010.07.013. ISSN 0736-5845.

^ Ray, Partha Pratim (2016). "Internet of Robotic Things: Concept, Technologies, and Challenges". IEEE Access. 4: 9489–9500. Bibcode:2016IEEEA...4.9489R. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2647747. ISSN 2169-3536. S2CID 9273802.

^ a b Burn, K.; Short, M.; Bicker, R. (July 2003). "Adaptive and Nonlinear Fuzzy Force Control Techniques Applied to Robots Operating in Uncertain Environments". Journal of Robotic Systems. 20 (7): 391–400. doi:10.1002/rob.10093. ISSN 0741-2223. Archived from the original on 2022-11-26. Retrieved 2023-03-15.

^ Burn, Kevin; Home, Geoffrey (1 May 2008). "Environment classification using Kohonen self-organizing maps". Expert Systems. 25 (2): 98–114. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0394.2008.00441.x. ISSN 0266-4720. S2CID 33369232.

^ "A Ping-Pong-Playing Terminator". Popular Science. Archived from the original on 2021-01-22. Retrieved 2010-12-19.

^ "Synthiam Exosphere combines AI, human operators to train robots". The Robot Report. Archived from the original on 2020-10-06. Retrieved 2020-04-29.

^ a b Kagan, Eugene; Ben-Gal, Irad (2015). Search and foraging:individual motion and swarm dynamics. Chapman and Hall/CRC. ISBN 9781482242102. Archived from the original on 2023-03-15. Retrieved 2020-08-26.

^ Banks, Jaime (2020). "Optimus Primed: Media Cultivation of Robot Mental Models and Social Judgments". Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 7: 62. doi:10.3389/frobt.2020.00062. PMC 7805817. PMID 33501230.

^ a b Wullenkord, Ricarda; Fraune, Marlena R.; Eyssel, Friederike; Sabanovic, Selma (2016). "Getting in Touch: How imagined, actual, and physical contact affect evaluations of robots". 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). pp. 980–985. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745228. ISBN 978-1-5090-3929-6. S2CID 6305599.

^ Norberto Pires, J. (December 2005). "Robot-by-voice: experiments on commanding an industrial robot using the human voice". Industrial Robot. 32 (6): 505–511. doi:10.1108/01439910510629244.

^ "Survey of the State of the Art in Human Language Technology: 1.2: Speech Recognition". Archived from the original on 2007-11-11.

^ Fournier, Randolph Scott; Schmidt, B. June (1995). "Voice input technology: Learning style and attitude toward its use". Delta Pi Epsilon Journal. 37 (1): 1–12. ProQuest 1297783046.

^ "History of Speech & Voice Recognition and Transcription Software". Dragon Naturally Speaking. Archived from the original on 2015-08-13. Retrieved 2007-10-27.

^ Cheng Lin, Kuan; Huang, Tien-Chi; Hung, Jason C.; Yen, Neil Y.; Ju Chen, Szu (7 June 2013). "Facial emotion recognition towards affective computing-based learning". Library Hi Tech. 31 (2): 294–307. doi:10.1108/07378831311329068.

^ Walters, M. L.; Syrdal, D. S.; Koay, K. L.; Dautenhahn, K.; Te Boekhorst, R. (2008). "Human approach distances to a mechanical-looking robot with different robot voice styles". RO-MAN 2008 - the 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. pp. 707–712. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2008.4600750. ISBN 978-1-4244-2212-8. S2CID 8653718.

^ Pauletto, Sandra; Bowles, Tristan (2010). "Designing the emotional content of a robotic speech signal". Proceedings of the 5th Audio Mostly Conference on a Conference on Interaction with Sound - AM '10. pp. 1–8. doi:10.1145/1859799.1859804. ISBN 978-1-4503-0046-9. S2CID 30423778.

^ Bowles, Tristan; Pauletto, Sandra (2010). Emotions in the Voice: Humanising a Robotic Voice (PDF). Proceedings of the 7th Sound and Music Computing Conference. Barcelona. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2023-02-10. Retrieved 2023-03-15.

^ "World of 2-XL: Leachim". www.2xlrobot.com. Archived from the original on 2020-07-05. Retrieved 2019-05-28.

^ "The Boston Globe from Boston, Massachusetts on June 23, 1974 · 132". Newspapers.com. 23 June 1974. Archived from the original on 2020-01-10. Retrieved 2019-05-28.

^ a b "cyberneticzoo.com - Page 135 of 194 - a history of cybernetic animals and early robots". cyberneticzoo.com. Archived from the original on 2020-08-06. Retrieved 2019-05-28.

^ Waldherr, Stefan; Romero, Roseli; Thrun, Sebastian (1 September 2000). "A Gesture Based Interface for Human-Robot Interaction". Autonomous Robots. 9 (2): 151–173. doi:10.1023/A:1008918401478. S2CID 1980239.

^ Li, Ling Hua; Du, Ji Fang (December 2012). "Visual Based Hand Gesture Recognition Systems". Applied Mechanics and Materials. 263–266: 2422–2425. Bibcode:2012AMM...263.2422L. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.263-266.2422. S2CID 62744240.

^ "Frubber facial expressions". Archived from the original on 2009-02-07.

^ "Best Inventions of 2008 – TIME". Time. 29 October 2008. Archived from the original on 2008-11-02 – via www.time.com.

^ "Kismet: Robot at MIT's AI Lab Interacts With Humans". Sam Ogden. Archived from the original on 2007-10-12. Retrieved 2007-10-28.

^ "Armenian Robin the Robot to comfort kids at U.S. clinics starting July". Public Radio of Armenia. Archived from the original on 2021-05-13. Retrieved 2021-05-13.

^ Park, S.; Sharlin, Ehud; Kitamura, Y.; Lau, E. (29 April 2005). Synthetic Personality in Robots and its Effect on Human-Robot Relationship (Report). doi:10.11575/PRISM/31041. hdl:1880/45619.

^ "Robot Receptionist Dishes Directions and Attitude". NPR.org. Archived from the original on 2020-12-01. Retrieved 2018-04-05.

^ "New Scientist: A good robot has personality but not looks" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-09-29.

^ "Playtime with Pleo, your robotic dinosaur friend". 25 September 2008. Archived from the original on 2019-01-20. Retrieved 2014-12-14.

^ NOVA conversation with Professor Moravec, October 1997. NOVA Online Archived 2017-08-02 at the Wayback Machine

^ Agarwal, P.K. Elements of Physics XI. Rastogi Publications. p. 2. ISBN 978-81-7133-911-2.

^ Sandhana, Lakshmi (5 September 2002). "A Theory of Evolution, for Robots". Wired. Archived from the original on 2014-03-29. Retrieved 2007-10-28.

^ Experimental Evolution In Robots Probes The Emergence Of Biological Communication. 24 February 2007. Archived from the original on 2018-11-16. Retrieved 2007-10-28. {{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help)

^ Žlajpah, Leon (15 December 2008). "Simulation in robotics". Mathematics and Computers in Simulation. 79 (4): 879–897. doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2008.02.017.

^ "Evolution trains robot teams TRN 051904". Technology Research News. Archived from the original on 2016-06-23. Retrieved 2009-01-22.

^ Tandon, Prateek (2017). Quantum Robotics. Morgan & Claypool Publishers. ISBN 978-1627059138.

^ Dragani, Rachelle (8 November 2018). "Can a robot make you a 'superworker'?". Verizon Communications. Archived from the original on 2020-08-06. Retrieved 2018-12-03.

^ "Robotics". American Elements. Retrieved 2023-04-10.

^ "Career: Robotics Engineer". Princeton Review. 2012. Archived from the original on 2015-01-21. Retrieved 2012-01-27.

^ Saad, Ashraf; Kroutil, Ryan (2012). Hands-on Learning of Programming Concepts Using Robotics for Middle and High School Students. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Southeast Regional Conference of the Association for Computing Machinery. ACM. pp. 361–362. doi:10.1145/2184512.2184605.

^ Toy, Tommy (29 June 2011). "Outlook for robotics and Automation for 2011 and beyond are excellent says expert". PBT Consulting. Archived from the original on 2012-01-27. Retrieved 2012-01-27.

^ Frey, Carl Benedikt; Osborne, Michael A. (January 2017). "The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?". Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 114: 254–280. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.395.416. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019.

^ McGaughey, Ewan (16 October 2019). "Will robots automate your job away? Full employment, basic income, and economic democracy". LawArXiv Papers. doi:10.31228/osf.io/udbj8. S2CID 243172487. SSRN 3044448.

^ Hawking, Stephen (1 January 2016). "This is the most dangerous time for our planet". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2021-01-31. Retrieved 2019-11-22.

^ "Robotics – Thematic Research". GlobalData. Archived from the original on 2021-09-28. Retrieved 2021-09-22.

^ "Focal Points Seminar on review articles in the future of work – Safety and health at work – EU-OSHA". osha.europa.eu. Archived from the original on 2020-01-25. Retrieved 2016-04-19.

^ "Robotics: Redefining crime prevention, public safety and security". SourceSecurity.com. Archived from the original on 2017-10-09. Retrieved 2016-09-16.

^ "Draft Standard for Intelligent Assist Devices — Personnel Safety Requirements" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-11-25. Retrieved 2016-06-01.

^ "ISO/TS 15066:2016 – Robots and robotic devices – Collaborative robots". 8 March 2016. Archived from the original on 2016-10-10. Retrieved 2016-06-01.

^ Brogårdh, Torgny (January 2007). "Present and future robot control development—An industrial perspective". Annual Reviews in Control. 31 (1): 69–79. doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2007.01.002. ISSN 1367-5788.

^ Wang, Tian-Miao; Tao, Yong; Liu, Hui (17 April 2018). "Current Researches and Future Development Trend of Intelligent Robot: A Review". International Journal of Automation and Computing. 15 (5): 525–546. doi:10.1007/s11633-018-1115-1. ISSN 1476-8186. S2CID 126037910. Archived from the original on 2023-03-15. Retrieved 2023-03-15.

^ Svoboda, Elizabeth (25 September 2019). "Your robot surgeon will see you now". Nature. 573 (7775): S110–S111. Bibcode:2019Natur.573S.110S. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-02874-0. PMID 31554995.

^ "Robotics: About the Exhibition". The Tech Museum of Innovation. Archived from the original on 2008-09-13. Retrieved 2008-09-15.

^ Needham, Joseph (1991). Science and Civilisation in China: Volume 2, History of Scientific Thought. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-05800-1.

^ Fowler, Charles B. (October 1967). "The Museum of Music: A History of Mechanical Instruments". Music Educators Journal. 54 (2): 45–49. doi:10.2307/3391092. JSTOR 3391092. S2CID 190524140.

^ Rosheim, Mark E. (1994). Robot Evolution: The Development of Anthrobotics. Wiley-IEEE. pp. 9–10. ISBN 978-0-471-02622-8.

^ al-Jazari (Islamic artist) Archived 2008-05-07 at the Wayback Machine, Encyclopædia Britannica.

^ A. P. Yuste. Electrical Engineering Hall of Fame. Early Developments of Wireless Remote Control: The Telekino of Torres-Quevedo,(pdf) vol. 96, No. 1, January 2008, Proceedings of the IEEE.

^ H. R. Everett (2015). Unmanned Systems of World Wars I and II. MIT Press. pp. 91–95. ISBN 978-0-262-02922-3.

^ Randy Alfred, "Nov. 7, 1905: Remote Control Wows Public", Wired, 7 November 2011.

^ Williams, Andrew (16 March 2017). History of Digital Games: Developments in Art, Design and Interaction. CRC Press. ISBN 9781317503811.

^ Randell, Brian (October 1982). "From Analytical Engine to Electronic Digital Computer: The Contributions of Ludgate, Torres, and Bush". IEEE Annals of the History of Computing. 4 (4): 327–341. doi:10.1109/MAHC.1982.10042. S2CID 1737953.

^ L. Torres Quevedo. Ensayos sobre Automática - Su definicion. Extension teórica de sus aplicaciones, Revista de la Academia de Ciencias Exacta, Revista 12, pp.391-418, 1914.

^ Torres Quevedo, Leonardo. Automática: Complemento de la Teoría de las Máquinas, (pdf), pp. 575-583, Revista de Obras Públicas, 19 November 1914.

^ L. Torres Quevedo. Essais sur l'Automatique - Sa définition. Etendue théorique de ses applications Archived 2023-02-10 at the Wayback Machine, Revue Génerale des Sciences Pures et Appliquées, vol.2, pp.601-611, 1915.

^ B. Randell. Essays on Automatics, The Origins of Digital Computers, pp.89-107, 1982.

^ PhD, Renato M.E. Sabbatini. "Sabbatini, RME: An Imitation of Life: The First Robots". Archived from the original on 2009-07-20. Retrieved 2023-03-15.

^ Waurzyniak, Patrick (2006). "Masters of Manufacturing: Joseph F. Engelberger". Society of Manufacturing Engineers. 137 (1). Archived from the original on 2011-11-09.

^ "Humanoid History -WABOT-". www.humanoid.waseda.ac.jp. Archived from the original on 2017-09-01. Retrieved 2017-05-06.

^ Zeghloul, Saïd; Laribi, Med Amine; Gazeau, Jean-Pierre (21 September 2015). Robotics and Mechatronics: Proceedings of the 4th IFToMM International Symposium on Robotics and Mechatronics. Springer. ISBN 9783319223681. Archived from the original on 2023-03-15. Retrieved 2017-09-10 – via Google Books.

^ "Historical Android Projects". androidworld.com. Archived from the original on 2005-11-25. Retrieved 2017-05-06.

^ Robots: From Science Fiction to Technological Revolution Archived 2023-03-15 at the Wayback Machine, page 130

^ Duffy, Vincent G. (19 April 2016). Handbook of Digital Human Modeling: Research for Applied Ergonomics and Human Factors Engineering. CRC Press. ISBN 9781420063523. Archived from the original on 2023-03-15. Retrieved 2017-09-10 – via Google Books.

^ "KUKA Industrial Robot FAMULUS". Archived from the original on 2009-02-20. Retrieved 2008-01-10.

^ "History of Industrial Robots" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-12-24. Retrieved 2012-10-27.

^ R. J. Popplestone; A. P. Ambler; I. Bellos (1978). "RAPT: A language for describing assemblies". Industrial Robot. 5 (3): 131–137. doi:10.1108/eb004501.

^ Bozinovski, S. (1994). "Parallel programming for mobile robot control: Agent-based approach". 14th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. pp. 202–208. doi:10.1109/ICDCS.1994.302412. ISBN 0-8186-5840-1. S2CID 27855786.

Further reading[edit]

R. Andrew Russell (1990). Robot Tactile Sensing. New York: Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-13-781592-0.

McGaughey, Ewan (16 October 2019). "Will robots automate your job away? Full employment, basic income, and economic democracy". LawArXiv Papers. doi:10.31228/osf.io/udbj8. S2CID 243172487. SSRN 3044448.

Autor, David H. (1 August 2015). "Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation". Journal of Economic Perspectives. 29 (3): 3–30. doi:10.1257/jep.29.3.3. hdl:1721.1/109476.

Tooze, Adam (6 June 2019). "Democracy and Its Discontents". The New York Review of Books. Vol. 66, no. 10.

External links[edit]

Robotics at Wikipedia's sister projects

Definitions from WiktionaryMedia from CommonsTextbooks from WikibooksResources from Wikiversity

Robotics at Curlie

IEEE Robotics and Automation Society

Investigation of social robots – Robots that mimic human behaviors and gestures.

Wired's guide to the '50 best robots ever', a mix of robots in fiction (Hal, R2D2, K9) to real robots (Roomba, Mobot, Aibo).

vteRoboticsMain articles

Outline

Glossary

Index

History

Geography

Hall of Fame

Ethics

Laws

Competitions

AI competitions

Types

Aerobot

Anthropomorphic

Humanoid

Android

Cyborg

Gynoid

Claytronics

Companion

Automaton

Animatronic

Audio-Animatronics

Industrial

Articulated

arm

Domestic

Educational

Entertainment

Juggling

Military

Medical

Service

Disability

Agricultural

Food service

Retail

BEAM robotics

Soft robotics

Classifications

Biorobotics

Cloud robotics

Continuum robot

Unmanned vehicle

aerial

ground

Mobile robot

Microbotics

Nanorobotics

Necrobotics

Robotic spacecraft

Space probe

Swarm

Telerobotics

Underwater

remotely-operated

Robotic fish

Locomotion

Tracks

Walking

Hexapod

Climbing

Electric unicycle

Robotic fins

Navigation and mapping

Motion planning

Simultaneous localization and mapping

Visual odometry

Vision-guided robot systems

Research

Evolutionary

Kits

Simulator

Suite

Open-source

Software

Adaptable

Developmental

Human–robot interaction

Paradigms

Perceptual

Situated

Ubiquitous

Companies

Amazon Robotics

Anybots

Barrett Technology

Boston Dynamics

Energid Technologies

FarmWise

FANUC

Foster-Miller

Harvest Automation

Honeybee Robotics

Intuitive Surgical

IRobot

KUKA

Starship Technologies

Symbotic

Universal Robotics

Wolf Robotics

Yaskawa

Related

Critique of work

Powered exoskeleton

Workplace robotics safety

Robotic tech vest

Technological unemployment

Terrainability

Fictional robots

Category

Outline

vteEngineering

History

Outline

List of engineering branches

SpecialtiesandInterdisciplinarityCivil

Architectural

Coastal

Construction

Earthquake

Environmental

Ecological

Sanitary

Geological

Geotechnical

Hydraulic

Mining

Offshore

River

Structural

Transportation

Mechanical

Acoustical

Aerospace

Automotive

Energy

HVAC

Manufacturing

Marine

Naval architecture

Railway

Sports

Tribology

Electrical

Broadcast

Computer

outline

Control

Electromechanics

Electronics

Avionics

Microwaves

Optical

Photonics

Power

Radio frequency

Telecommunications

Chemical

Biochemical

Biological

Biomaterial

Bioresource

Genetic

Synthetic biology

Tissue

Electrochemical

Food

Molecular

Paper

Petroleum

Process

Reaction

Other

Agricultural

Audio

Biomedical

Bioinformatics

Clinical

Health technology

Pharmaceutical

Prosthesis

Rehabilitation

Building services

MEP

Geoengineering

Corrosion

Design

Engineering management

Engineering mathematics

Engineering physics

Explosives

Facilities

Fire

Geomatics

Industrial

Information

Logistics

Materials

Ceramics

Metals

Plastics

Polymers

Surface

Mechatronics

Robotics

Military

Nanotechnology

Nuclear

Ontology

Packaging

Piping

Privacy

Safety

Survey

Security

Software

Systems

Textile

Engineering education

Bachelor of Engineering

Master of Engineering

Doctor of Engineering

Engineer's degree

Engineering studies

Related topics

Engineer

Glossaries

Engineering

A–L

M–Z

Aerospace engineering

Civil engineering

Electrical and electronics engineering

Mechanical engineering

Structural engineering

Category

Commons

Wikiproject

Portal

vteEmerging technologiesFieldsManufacturing

3D microfabrication

3D printing

3D publishing

Claytronics

Molecular assembler

Smart manufacturing

Utility fog

Materials science

Aerogel

Amorphous metal

Artificial muscle

Conductive polymer

Femtotechnology

Fullerene

Graphene

High-temperature superconductivity

High-temperature superfluidity

Linear acetylenic carbon

Metamaterials

Metamaterial cloaking

Metal foam

Multi-function structures

Nanotechnology

Carbon nanotubes

Molecular nanotechnology

Nanomaterials

Picotechnology

Programmable matter

Quantum dots

Silicene

Synthetic diamond

Robotics

Domotics

Nanorobotics

Powered exoskeleton

Self-reconfiguring modular robot

Swarm robotics

Uncrewed vehicle

Topics

Automation

Collingridge dilemma

Differential technological development

Disruptive innovation

Ephemeralization

Ethics

Bioethics

Cyberethics

Neuroethics

Robot ethics

Exploratory engineering

Proactionary principle

Technological change

Technological unemployment

Technological convergence

Technological evolution

Technological paradigm

Technology forecasting

Accelerating change

Future-oriented technology analysis

Horizon scanning

Moore's law

Technological singularity

Technology scouting

Technology in science fiction

Technology readiness level

Technology roadmap

Transhumanism

List

vteGlossaries of science and engineering

Aerospace engineering

Agriculture

Archaeology

Architecture

Artificial intelligence

Astronomy

Biology

Botany

Calculus

Cell biology

Chemistry

Civil engineering

Clinical research

Computer hardware

Computer science

Developmental and reproductive biology

Ecology

Economics

Electrical and electronics engineering

Engineering

A–L

M–Z

Entomology

Environmental science

Genetics and evolutionary biology

Cellular and molecular biology

0–L

M–Z

Geography

A–M

N–Z

Arabic toponyms

Hebrew toponyms

Western and South Asia

Geology

Ichthyology

Machine vision

Mathematics

Mechanical engineering

Medicine

Meteorology

Mycology

Nanotechnology

Ornithology

Physics

Probability and statistics

Psychiatry

Quantum computing

Robotics

Scientific naming

Structural engineering

Virology

Authority control databases National

Spain

France

BnF data

Germany

Israel

United States

Czech Republic

Other

NARA

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robotics&oldid=1212634406"

Category: RoboticsHidden categories: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors listCS1: long volume valueWebarchive template wayback linksCS1 errors: periodical ignoredArticles with short descriptionShort description is different from WikidataWikipedia indefinitely move-protected pagesWikipedia neutral point of view disputes from November 2022All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputesCoatrack articlesArticles needing additional references from November 2022All articles needing additional referencesArticles with multiple maintenance issuesUse dmy dates from April 2023Articles needing additional references from July 2009All articles with unsourced statementsArticles with unsourced statements from December 2011Articles containing Chinese-language textArticles with unsourced statements from November 2022Pages using Sister project links with hidden wikidataArticles with Curlie linksArticles with BNE identifiersArticles with BNF identifiersArticles with BNFdata identifiersArticles with GND identifiersArticles with J9U identifiersArticles with LCCN identifiersArticles with NKC identifiersArticles with NARA identifiers

This page was last edited on 8 March 2024, at 21:27 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0;

additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view

Toggle limited content width

What is a Robot?

is a Robot?EducationSign InMenuDonateARTICLEARTICLEWhat is a Robot?What is a Robot?Learn about the three essential ingredients that make robots special.Grades5 - 12SubjectsEngineeringImagerobots 3d landing pagePhotograph courtesy National Geographic EntertainmentProgramBackground InfoVocabularyWhen you think of a robot, what do you see? A machine that looks a bit like you and me? The reality is that robots can come in many different shapes and sizes. They don’t need to look like humans—in fact, most don’t. What a robot looks like depends on its purpose. Flying robots might look like helicopters, or have wings like insects or birds. Cleaning robots often look like little vacuums. Robots that are meant to interact with people often have a face, eyes, or a mouth—just like we do! Whether they look like us or not, most robots have three essential ingredients that make them a robot: sensors, actuators, and programs. Together, these ingredients are what make a robot different from other electronics and gadgets you might have around your house, like your computer, your washing machine, or your toaster. Sensors, Actuators, and Programs First, a robot has sensors that allow it to perceive the world. Just like we have eyes to sense light, ears to sense sound, and nerves in our skin that sense if something is touching us, robots have light sensors and cameras so they can “see,” microphones so they can “hear,” and pressure sensors so they can “feel” the things around them. The kinds of sensors that a robot needs depends on what the robot was made for. A robot vacuum cleaner might use a bumper with pressure sensors to understand where a wall is. A flying robot uses a group of sensors called an inertial measurement unit (IMU) to help it stay balanced when it flies. Some of the sensors used by robots are very different from the kinds of sensors used by people. Second, a robot has actuators that allow it to move around. We might use our legs and feet to walk and run, and we might use our hands to pick up an orange and peel it. A robot might use actuators such as motors and wheels to drive places, and finger-like grippers to grab objects and manipulate them or turn them around. Third, a robot needs a program that lets it act on its own based on what it is sensing. This ability to act on one’s own is called autonomy. Let’s look at this idea of autonomy more closely. Autonomy Can you think of anything that has autonomy? People have autonomy, because they can decide for themselves how to behave or move—at least most of the time! Your toaster, your washing machine, or a remote-controlled toy are examples of machines that don’t have autonomy, because they depend on a person to make decisions for them. When a robot is autonomous, it’s not quite the same as a person being autonomous, because a person still has to write the computer program that tells the robot what to do. For example, when we listen to music, our brains are in charge of telling us how to move our own legs to the beat—we don’t need someone to move our legs for us! But what if we want to build a robot that can autonomously dance to a beat? What three basic things would we need?1. Sensor. We would need a microphone (sound sensor) so that the robot could hear the music.2. Actuators. We would need some actuators (like motors with wheels) so that the robot could move.3. Program. We would need to write a program that says to the robot: “When you hear the music beat, move this way.” We would also need a computer—the robot’s brain—that could process all the sensory information and run the program, and some kind of power supply (like a battery) to provide electricity to our robot. The video above shows a simple robot that has been programmed to dance autonomously when it hears music. Check out those dance moves! Some robots are more advanced than our little dancing robot. Autonomous cars, for example, have advanced sensors that allow them to measure the distance to all objects in their environment and build a 3-dimensional (3-D) map of the area. They then have an advanced program that understands the meaning of the cars, roads, and obstacles in the 3D map. Based on this understanding, the program controls the robot’s speed and steering. Other robots are being designed to help at home, explore space, or improve our efficiency at work. Whatever their purpose, each robot will need a carefully thought-out set of sensors, actuators, and programs. While robots are becoming more advanced, it’s important to understand their limitations. How can they interact with humans in a natural way? How do they adapt to the real world, which is often full of unexpected events that are hard for machines to understand? And how can we make batteries that will keep them powered for long periods and that aren’t too heavy to carry around? These are the kinds of questions that robotics experts are working hard to solve.CreditsMedia CreditsThe audio, illustrations, photos, and videos are credited beneath the media asset, except for promotional images, which generally link to another page that contains the media credit. The Rights Holder for media is the person or group credited.WriterEditorNational Geographic SocietyProducersNational Geographic SocietySamantha Zuhlke, National Geographic SocietyotherLast UpdatedOctober 19, 2023User PermissionsFor information on user permissions, please read our Terms of Service. If you have questions about how to cite anything on our website in your project or classroom presentation, please contact your teacher. They will best know the preferred format. When you reach out to them, you will need the page title, URL, and the date you accessed the resource.MediaIf a media asset is downloadable, a download button appears in the corner of the media viewer. If no button appears, you cannot download or save the media.TextText on this page is printable and can be used according to our Terms of Service.InteractivesAny interactives on this page can only be played while you are visiting our website. You cannot download interactives.Related ResourcesSponsorNational Geographic Headquarters 1145 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20036ABOUTNational Geographic SocietyNatGeo.comNews and ImpactContact UsExploreOur ExplorersOur ProgramsEducationNat Geo LiveStorytellers CollectiveTraveling ExhibitionsJoin UsWays to GiveApply for a GrantCareersdonateget updatesConnectNational Geographic Society is a 501 (c)(3) organization. © 1996 - 2024 National Geographic Society. All rights reserved.Privacy Notice|Sustainability Policy|Terms of Service|Code of Eth

How do robots work? - Explain that Stuff

How do robots work? - Explain that Stuff

Home

A-Z index

Random article

Timeline

Teaching guide

About us

Privacy & cookies

You are here:

Home page >

Tools, instruments, and measurement >

Robots

Robots

by Chris Woodford. Last updated: January 20, 2022.

If you had a big enough construction set with

enough wheels, gears, and other bits and bobs, and a limitless supply of electronic components, could you bolt together a living, breathing, walking, talking robot as good as a human in every way?

That might sound like one question, but it's really several.

First, there's the matter of whether it's technically

possible to build a robot that compares with a human. But there's

also a much bigger question of why you'd want to do that and

whether it's even a useful thing to do. When humans can reproduce

so easily, why do we want to create clunky mechanical replicas of

ourselves? And if there really is a good reason for doing so, what's

the best way to go about it? In this article, we'll be taking

a detailed look at what robots are, how they're designed, and some

of the things they can do for us.

Photo: Our friends electric. Will robots replace

people in the future? Or will people and machines merge into flesh-machine hybrids

that combine the best of both worlds?

For all we know, Octavia (pictured here) is pondering these questions right now. She's an advanced social robot who can scuttle around on her wheels, pick up

objects, and pull a variety of emotional faces. Her biggest challenge

so far has been helping to

put out fires.

Photo by John F. Williams courtesy of US Navy and Wikimedia Commons.

Sponsored links

Contents

Imaginary friends

How do you build a robot?

Perception (sensing)

Cognition (thinking)

Action (doing)

What are robots actually like?

Our robot future

A brief history of robots

Find out more

Imaginary friends

Close your eyes and think "robot." What picture leaps to mind?

Most likely a fictional creature like R2-D2 or C-3PO from Star Wars. Very likely a

humanoid—a humanlike robot with arms, legs, and a head,

probably painted metallic silver. Unless you happen to work in robotics, I doubt you pictured a

mechanical snake or a clockwork cockroach, a bomb disposal robot, or a

Roomba robot vacuum cleaner.

What you pictured, in other words, would have been

based more on science fiction than fact, more on imagination than

reality. Where the sci-fi robots we see in movies and TV shows tend to

be humanoids, the humdrum robots working away in the world around us

(things like robotic welder arms in car-assembly plants) are much more

functional, much less entertaining. For some reason, sci-fi writers have an obsession with

robots that are little more than flawed, tin-can, replacement humans.

Maybe that makes for a better story, but it doesn't really reflect

the current state of robot technology, with its emphasis on developing practical

robots that can work alongside humans.

How do you build a robot?

Photo: Is this a robot? It certainly looks like one, but it has no senses of any kind, no electronic or mechanical onboard computer for thinking, and its limbs have no motors or other means to move themselves. With no perception, cognition, or action, it cannot be a robot—even if it looks like a robot.

Photo by Thom Quine courtesy of Wikimedia Commons published under a

Creative Commons licence.

If robots like C-3PO really did exist, how would anyone ever have

developed them? What would it have taken to make a general-purpose robot

similar to a human?

It's easy enough to write entertaining stories about intelligent robots taking control of the planet, but just try

developing robots like that yourself and see how far you get. Where

would you even start? Actually, where any robot engineer starts, by

breaking that one big problem into smaller and more manageable

chunks. Essentially, there are three problems we need to solve: how

to make our robot 1) sense things (detect objects in the world), 2) think

about those things (in a more less "intelligent" way, which is a

tricky problem we'll explore in a moment), and then 3) act on them (move

or otherwise physically respond to the things it detects and thinks

about).

In

psychology (the science of human behavior) and in robotics, these things

are called perception (sensing), cognition (thinking), and action

(moving). Some robots have only one or two. For example, robot

welding arms in factories are mostly about action (though they may

have sensors), while robot vacuum cleaners are mostly about

perception and action and have no cognition to speak of. As we'll see

in a moment, there's been a long and lively debate over whether robots really need cognition,

but most engineers would agree that a machine needs both perception and action to qualify as a robot.

Sponsored links

Perception (sensing)

We experience the world through our five senses,

but what about robots? How do they get a feel for the things around

them?

Vision

Humans are seeing machines: estimates vary wildly,

but there's general agreement that about 25–60 percent

of our cerebral cortex is devoted to processing

images from our eyes and building

them into a 3D visual model of the world. Now machine vision

is really quite simple: all you need to do to give a robot eyes

is to glue a couple of

digital cameras to its head. But

machine perception—understanding what the camera sees (a

pattern of orange and black), what it represents (a tiger), what that

representation means (the possibility of being eaten), and how

relevant it is to you from one minute to the next (not at all,

because the tiger is locked inside a cage)—is almost infinitely harder.

Like other problems in robotics, tackling

perception as a theoretical issue ("how does a robot see and

perceive the world?") is much harder than approaching it as a

practical problem. So if you were designing something like a Roomba

vacuum cleaning robot, you could spend a good few years

agonizing over how to give it eyes that "see" a room and navigate

around the objects it contains. Or you could forget all about

something so involved as seeing and simply use a giant,

pressure-sensitive bumper. Let the robot scrabble around until the bumper hits

something, then apply the brakes and tell it to creep away in a

different direction.

Photo: Look no eyes! Spot, a quadruped robot built by Boston Dynamics, has a lidar (a kind of laser radar) where you'd expect its head to be (the small gray box at the front). Photo by Sgt. Eric Keenan courtesy of US Marine Corps.

Perception, in other words, doesn't have to mean

vision. And that's a very important lesson for ambitious projects

such as self-driving (robotic) cars. One way to build a self-driving

car would be to create a super-lifelike humanoid robot and stick it

in the driving seat of an ordinary car. It would drive in exactly the

same way as you or I might do: by looking out through the windshield

(with its digital camera eyes), interpreting what it sees, and

controlling the car in response with its hands and feet. But you

could also build a self-driving car an entirely different way without

anyone in the driving seat—and this is how most robotics engineers

have approached the problem. Instead of eyes, you'd use things like

GPS satellite navigation,

lidar,

sonar,

radar, and infrared detectors,

accelerometers—and any number of other sensors to build up a very

different kind of picture of where the car is, how it's proceeding in

relation to the road and other cars, and what you need to do next to

keep it safely in motion. Drivers see with their eyes; self-driving

cars see with their sensors. A driver's brain builds a moving 3D

model of the road; self-driving cars have computers, surfing a

flood of digital data quite unlike a human's mental model.

That doesn't mean there's no similarity at all.

It's quite easy to imagine a neural network

(a computer simulation of interconnected brain cells that can be trained

to recognize patterns) processing information from a self-driving car's sensors

so the vehicle can recognize situations like driving behind a learner,

spotting a looming emergency when children are playing ball by the side of

the road, and other danger signs that experienced drivers recognize automatically.

Hearing

Just as seeing is a misnomer when it comes to

machine vision, so the other human senses (hearing, smell, taste, and

touch) don't have exact replicas in the world of robotics. Where a

person hears with their ears, a robot uses a

microphone to convert

sounds into electrical signals that can be digitally processed. It's

relatively straightforward to sample a sound signal, analyze the

frequencies it contains (for example, using a mathematical

descrambling trick called a Fourier transform), and compare the

frequency "fingerprint" with a list of stored patterns. If the

frequencies in your signal match the pattern of a human scream, it's

a scream you're hearing—even if you're a robot and a scream means

nothing to you.

There's a big difference between hearing simple

sounds and understanding what a voice is saying to you, but even that

problem isn't beyond a machine's capability. Computers have been

successfully turning human speech into recognizable text for decades;

even my old PC, with simple, off-the-shelf,

voice recognition

software, can listen to my voice and faithfully print my words on the

screen. Interpreting the meaning of words is a very

different thing from turning sounds into words in the first place,

but it's a start.

Smell

You might think building a robotic nose is more of

a technical challenge, but it's just a matter of

building the right sensor. Smell is effectively a chemical

recognition system: molecules of vapor from a bacon butty,

a yawning iris, or the volatile liquids in perfume drift into our noses

and bind onto receptive cells, stimulating them electro-chemically. Our

brains do the rest. The way our brains are built explains some of

their highly unusual features, such as why smells are powerful memory

triggers. (The answer is simply because the bits of our brain that process smells are

physically very close to two other key bits of our brains,

namely the hippocampus, a kind of "crossroads" in our memory, and amygdala, where

emotions are processed.)

So, in the words of the old joke, if robots have no nose, how do they smell?

We have plenty of machines that can recognize

chemicals, including

mass spectrometers and

gas chromatographs, but

they're elaborate, expensive, and unwieldy; not the sorts of things

you could easily stuff up a nose. Nevertheless, robot scientists have

successfully built simpler electrochemical detectors that resemble

(at least, conceptually) the way the human nose converts smells into

electrical signals. Once that job's done, and the sensor has produced

a pattern of digital data, all you're left with is a computational

problem; not, "what does this smell like?", but what does this

data pattern represent? It's exactly like seeing or hearing: once the signals

have left your eyes, ears, or nose, and reached your brain, the problem is

simply one of pattern recognition.

Other senses

Photo: Engineers can building amazingly realistic

prosthetic hands. If we could modify these things with touch sensors, maybe they could double up as working hands for robots? Photo by Sarah Fortney courtesy of

US Navy [Via Wayback Machine].

Although robots have had arms and primitive grabber claws

for over half a century, giving them anything like a working human hand

has proved far more of a challenge.

Imagine a robot that can play Beethoven sonatas like a concert pianist,

perform high-precision brain surgery, carve stone like a sculptor,

or a thousand other things we humans can do with our touch-sensitive hands.

As the New York Times reported in September 2014,

building a robot with human touch

has suddenly become one of the most interesting problems in robotics research.

Taste, too, boils down simply to using appropriate chemical sensors.

If you want to build a food-tasting robot, a pH meter would be a

good starting point, perhaps with something to measure viscosity (how

easily a fluid flows). Then again, if you've already given your robot

eyes and a nose, that would go a long way to giving it taste, because the look

and smell of food play a big part in that.

One of the misleading things about trying to develop a humanoid

robot is that it tricks us into replicating only the five basic human senses—and one

of the great things about robots is that they can use any kind of sensor or

detector we can lay our hands on. There's no need at all for robot vision

to be confined to the ordinary visible spectrum of light: robots

could just as easily see X rays or infrared (with heat detectors).

Robots could also navigate like homing pigeons by following Earth's

magnetic field or (better still) by using GPS to track their precise

position from one moment to the next. Why limit ourselves to human

limitations?

Cognition (thinking)

Thinking about thinking is a recipe for doing not

much at all—other than thinking; that's the occupational hazard of

philosophers. And if that sounds fatuous, consider all the books and

scientific articles that have been published on

artificial intelligence since British computer scientist Alan Turing developed

what is now called the Turing test (a way of establishing whether a machine is "intelligent") in 1950. Psychologists, philosophers, and computer

scientists have been wrestling with definitions of "intelligence" ever since.

But that hasn't necessarily got them any nearer to developing an intelligent machine.

"No cognition. Just sensing and action. This is

all I would build, and completely leave out... the intelligence

of artificial intelligence."

Rodney A. Brooks, Robot: The Future of Flesh and Machines, p.36.

As British robot engineer Kevin Warwick pointed out about 20 years

ago in his book March of the Machines, "intelligence" is an inherently human concept.

Just because there's a lofty view from where people happen to be

standing, it doesn't follow that there aren't better views from elsewhere.

Human intelligence tests measure your

ability to do well at human intelligence tests—and don't

necessarily translate into an ability to do useful things in the real

world. Developing computer-controlled machines that humans would

regard as intelligent is not really the goal of modern robotics

research. The real objective is to produce millions of machines that can work

effectively alongside billions of humans, either augmenting our abilities or

doing things we simply don't want to do; we don't automatically need

"intelligence" for that. According to pragmatic engineers like Warwick, robots should be assessed on their

own terms against the specific tasks they're designed for, not

according to some fuzzy, human concept of "intelligence"

designed to flatter human self-esteem. Is a robot intelligent?

Who cares if it does the job we need it to do, maybe better than a

person would.

Emotional intelligence

Photo: Robots are designed with friendly faces so

humans don't feel threatened when they work alongside them. This one is called Emo

and it lives at Think Tank, the science museum in Birmingham, England.

Its digital-cameras eyes help it to learn and recognize human expressions, while the

rubber-tube lips allow it to smile and make expressions of its own.

Whether they're deemed intelligent or not,

computers and robots are quintessentially logical and rational where

humans are more emotional and inconsistent. Developing robots that

are emotional—particularly ones that can sense and respond to human

emotions—is arguably much more important than making intelligent

machines. Would you rather your coworkers were cold, logical,

hyperintelligent beings who could solve every problem and never make

a mistake? Or friendly, easy-going, pleasant to pass time with, and

fallibly human? Most people would probably chose the latter, simply

because it makes for more effective teamwork—and that's how

most of us generally get things done. So developing a likeable robot that has

the ability to listen, smile, tell jokes round the water cooler,

and sympathize when your life takes a turn for the worse

is arguably just as important as making one that's clever. Indeed, one

of the main reasons for developing humanoid robots is not to

replicate human emotions but to make machines that people don't feel

scared or threatened by—and building robots that can make eye

contact, chuckle, or smile is a very effective way to do that.

Emotion is often in the eye of the beholder—especially when it comes to humans and machines.

When people look at cars, they tend to see faces (two headlights for eyes, a radiator grille

for a mouth) or link particular emotions with certain colours of

paintwork (a red car is racy, a black one is dark and mysterious, a

silver one is elegant and professional). In much the same way, people

project feelings onto robots simply because of how they look or

move: the robot has no emotions; the emotions it conjurs up are

entirely in your mind. One of the world's leading robot engineers,

MIT's Rodney Brooks, tells a story of how he was involved in the

development of a robotic baby toy so lifelike that it provoked

sincere feelings of attachment in the adults and children who looked after

it. Kismet, an "emotional robot" developed in the late 1990s by Cynthia Breazeal,

one of his students, listens, coos, and pays attention to humans in

a startlingly babylike way—to the extent that people grow very attached to

it, as a parent to a child. Again, the robot has nothing like human emotions; it simply

provokes an authentic emotional reaction in humans and we interpret

our own feelings as though the robot were emotional too. In

other words, we might redefine the problem of developing emotional robots as

making machines that humans really care about.

Action (doing)

How a robot moves and responds to the world is the

most important thing about it. Intelligent machines that sense and

think but don't move or respond hardly qualify as robots;

they're really just computers. Action is a much more complex problem

than it might seem, both in humans and machines. In humans, the sheer

number of muscles, tendons, bones, and nerves in our limbs make

coordinatred, accurate body control a logistical nightmare.

There's nothing easier than lifting your hand to scratch your nose—your brain makes

it seem to easy—but if we try to replicate this sort of behavior

in a machine, we instantly realize how difficult it is. That's one reason why,

until relatively recently, virtually all robots moved around on

wheels rather than fully articulated human legs

(wheels are generally faster and more reliable, but hopeless at managing rough terrain or stairs).

Photo: Robotic Hexapod uses six spinning legs to negotiate rough, rocky terrain that wheels

would struggle to cross. It can also use its legs to swim! Photo by Robbin Cresswell courtesy of

US Air Force.

Just because a robot has to move, it doesn't

follow that it has to move like a person. Factory robots are designed

around giant electric, hydraulic, or pneumatic arms fitted with various tools

geared to specific jobs, like painting, welding, or laser-cutting

fabric. No human can swivel their wrist through 360 degrees, but factory

robots can; there's simply no good reason to be bound by human

limitations. Indeed, there's no reason why robots have to act (move)

like humans at all. Virtually every other animal you can think of,

from salamanders and sharks to snakes and turkeys, has been

replicated in robot form: it often makes much more sense for robots

to scuttle round like animals than prance about like people.

By the same token, making

"emotional robots" (ones to which people feel emotions) doesn't

necessarily have to mean building humanoids. That explains the

instant success of Sony's robotic AIBO dogs, launched in 1999. They

were essentially robotic pets onto which people projected their need

for companionship.

Photo: Robots don't have to look or work like humans. This is

BigDog, the infamous robotic "pack-mule" designed for the US military by Boston Dynamics. Where most robots are electrically powered,

this one is driven by four hydraulic legs powered by a small internal combustion engine from a go-kart.

In theory, that gives it a big advantage over robots powered by batteries (it should be able to

go much further); in practice, its official range is just 32km (20 miles). Photo by Kyle J. O. Olson courtesy of

US Marine Corps [Via the Wayback Machine].

Human perception and cognition are hard things for robots to emulate, partly

because it's easy to get bogged down in abstract and theoretical arguments

about what these terms actually mean. Action is a much simpler problem: movement is movement—we don't have to worry about defining it, the same way we worry over "intelligence," for example. Ironically, though we admire the remarkable grace of a ballet dancer, the leaps and bounds of a world-class athlete, or the painstaking care of a traditional craftsman, we take it for granted that robots will be able to zing about or make things for us with even greater precision. How do they manage it? Some use hydraulics. Most, however, rely on relatively simple, much more afforable electric stepper motors and servo

motors, which let a robot spin its wheels or swing its limbs with pinpoint control.

Unlike humans, which get tired and make mistakes, robot moves are reliably repeatable; robots get it right every time.

What are robots actually like?

Real-world robots fall into two broad categories.

Most are task-specific robots, designed to do one job and repeat it over

and over again. Hardly any are general-purpose robots

capable of doing a wide variety of jobs (in the way that humans are

general-purpose flesh-and-blood machines). Indeed, those

multi-purpose robots are still pretty much confined to robotics

labs.

Robot arms

Riveting and welding, swinging and sparking—most of the world's

robots are high-powered arms, like the ones you see in car factories. Although they became popular in the 1970s, they were

invented in the 1950s and first widely deployed in the 1960s by companies such as General

Motors. The original robot arm, Unimate, made its debut on the Johnny

Carson show back in 1966. Modern robot arms have more degrees of freedom

(they can be turned or rotated in more ways) and can be controlled much more precisely.

Photo: It might never have occurred to you that a robot built the

car you're driving today. This Jaguar assembly robot (a Kawasaki ZX165U) is a demonstration model

at Think Tank, the Birmingham science museum. It can lift loads of up to 300kg and reach

up to 3.5m (11.5ft)—quite a bit more than a human arm!

Whether robot arms really qualify as robots is a

moot point. Many of them lack much in the way of perception or

cognition; they're simply machines that repeat preprogrammed actions.

Fast, strong, powerful, and dangerous, they're usually fenced off in safety cages

and seldom work anywhere never people (a recent article in the

New York Times

noted that 33 people have been killed by robots in the United States during

the last 30 years). A few years ago, Rodney Brooks reinvented the whole idea of the robot arm with an

affordable ($25,000), easy-to-use, user-friendly industrial robot called

Baxter, which evolved into a similar machine named Sawyer.

It can be "trained" (Brooks avoids the word "reprogrammed") simply by moving its limbs, and it has enough onboard

sensory perception and cognition to work safely alongside humans,

sharing (for example) exactly the same assembly line.

Photo: Robot arms are versatile, precise, and—unlike human factory workers—don't

need rest, sleep, or holiday. But "all work and no play..." So this one is learning to play drums

for a change, at Think Tank, the Birmingham science museum.

Remote-controlled (teleoperated) machines

Some of the machines we think of as robots are

nothing of the kind: they merely appear robotic (and intelligent)

because humans are controlling them remotely. Bomb

disposal robots work this way: they're simply robot trucks with

cameras and manipulator arms operated by joysticks. Until recently,

space-exploration robots were designed much the same way, though autonomous

rovers (with enough onboard cognition to control themselves) are now commonplace.

So while 1997's Mars Sojourner (from the Pathfinder Mission) was semi-autonomous and

largely remote-controlled from Earth, the much bigger and newer

Mars Spirit and Opportunity rovers (launched in 2003) are far more autonomous.

Photo: Bomb-disposal robots are almost always remote-controlled. This one, Explosive Ordnance Disposal Mobile Unit (EODMU) 8, can pick up suspect devices with its jaw and carry them to safety.

Photo by Joe Ebalo courtesy of US Navy [Via Wayback Machine].

Semi-autonomous household robots

If you've got a robot in your home, most likely

it's a robot vacuum cleaner or lawn mower. Although these machines

give the impression that they're autonomous and semi-intelligent,

they're much simpler (and less robotic) than they appear. When you

switch on a Roomba, it doesn't have any idea about the room it's

cleaning—how big it is, how dirty it is, or the layout of the

furniture. And, unlike a human, it doesn't attempt to build itself a

mental model of the room as it's going along. It simply bounces off

things randomly and repeatedly, working on the (correct) assumption that if it

does this for long enough, the room will be fairly clean in the end.

There are a few extra little tweaks, including a spiraling,

on-the-spot cleaning mode that kicks in when a "dirt detect" sensor

finds concentrated debris, and the ability to follow edges. But essentially, a

Roomba cleans at random. Robot lawn mowers work in a somewhat similar

way (sometimes with a tether to stop them straying too far).

Photo: NASA's FIDO was one of its first semi-autonomous robot rovers. Onboard cameras allow space scientists to control it remotely from Earth. Photo courtesy of NASA JPL Planetary Robotics Laboratory and NASA on the Commons.

General-purpose robots

Although advanced robots like Baxter can be

trained to do many different things, they're still essentially

single-domain machines. Whether they're picking out badly

formed machine parts for quality control or shifting boxes from one

place to another, they're designed only to work on factory floors. We

still don't have a robot that can make the breakfast, take the kids to

school, drive itself to work somewhere else, come back home again, clean

the house, cook the dinner, and put itself on recharge—unless you

count your husband or wife.

Back in the 1990s, when Kevin Warwick wrote his bestselling book March

of the Machines, building intelligent, autonomous, general-purpose robots was

considered an overly ambitious research goal. Engineers like Warwick typified a

"hands-on" alternative approach to robotics, where grand plans were put aside and

robots simply evolved as their creators figured out better ways of building

robots with more advanced perception, cognition, and action. It's more like robot evolution,

working from the bottom up to develop increasingly advanced

creatures, than any sort of top-down approach that might be conceived

by a kind of robot-world equivalent of God.

Roll time forwards, however, and much has changed. Although engineers like

Kevin Warwick and Rodney Brooks are still champions of the pragmatic,

bottom-up, minimal-cognition approach, elsewhere, general-purpose autonomous

robots are making great strides forward—often literally, as well as metaphorically. The US

Defense Department's research wing, DARPA, has sponsored competitions

to develop humanoid robots that can cope

with a variety of tricky emergency situations, such as rescuing

people from natural disasters. (DARPA claims the intention is

humanitarian, but similar technology seems certain to be used in robotic

soldiers.) Thanks to video sites such as YouTube, robots like these, which would once

have been top-secret, have been "growing up in public"—with each

new incarnation of the stair stomping, chair balancing, car driving

robots instantly going viral on social media.

Self-driving cars

Photo: A cutting-edge, self-driving Lincoln MKZ packed with sensors,

including roof-mounted lidar, GPS, and radar.

Photo by Jake McClung courtesy of US Marine Corps and DVIDS.

Self-driving cars are a different flavor of general-purpose, autonomous robot. But

they've yet to catch the public's imagination in quite the same way,

perhaps because they've been developed more quietly, even secretly,

by companies such as Google. Now you could argue that there's nothing

remotely general-purpose about driving a car: it involves a robot

operating successfully in a single domain (the highway) in just the

same way as a Baxter (on the factory floor) or a Roomba (cleaning your home).

But the sheer complexity of driving—even humans take years to

properly master it—makes it, arguably, as much of a general-purpose

challenge as the one the DARPA robots are facing. Think of all the different

things you have to learn as a driver: starting off, stopping at a

signal, turning a corner, overtaking, parallel parking, slowing down

when the car in front indicates, emergency stops... to say nothing of

driving at daytime or night, in all kinds of weather, on every kind

of country road and superhighway. Maybe it would be easier just to

stick a humanoid robot in the driving seat after all.

Our robot future

There's no unknowing the things we learn. Technologies cannot be invented. The

march of the robots is unstoppable—but quite where they're

marching to, no-one yet knows. Futurologists like

Raymond Kurzweil

believe humans and machines will merge after we reach a point called

the singularity, where vastly powerful machines become more

intelligent than people. Humans will download their minds to

computers and zoom into the future, not in the "bodiless exultation" of

cyberspace (as William Gibson once put it) but in a steel and plastic doppelganger: a machine-body

powered by the immortal essence of a human mind.

More pragmatic, less dramatic scientists such as Rodney Brooks see a quieter form of

evolution where the last few decades of robotic technology begin to

augment what millions of years of natural selection have already cobbled together.

Brooks argues that we've been on this path for years, with

advanced prosthetic limbs, heart pacemakers, cochlear implants for

deaf people, robot "exoskeletons" that paralyzed people can slip over their bodies to

help them walk again, and (before much longer) widely available artificial

retinas for the blind. There will be no revolutionary jump from

human to robot but a smarter, smoother transition from flesh machines to

hybrids that are part human and part robot. Will robots take over

from people? Not according to Brooks: "Because there won't be any us

(people) for them (pure robots) to take over from... We (the robot

people) will be a step ahead of them (the pure robots). We won't have

to worry about them taking over."

A brief history of robots

Photo: PUMA is one of the world's best-known robot arms,

developed from Vic Scheinman's Vicarm in 1978.

Photo courtesy of NASA Ames Research Center.

When robots look back on their lives, what milestones spring to their computerized minds?

Here are some of the key moments in the long and continuing history of robotkind!

~100s AD:

Ancient Greeks invent automata (self-controlled machines). Hero of Alexandria uses hydraulics,

pneumatics, and steam power to construct all kinds of automatic machines, from self-closing doors to a

primitive robotic cart.

1739: French inventor Jacquard de Vaucanson builds an elaborate

mechanical duck with a

working digestion system that can eat and produce "feces."

1818: Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein raises the terrifying prospect of scientists creating

monsters that run out of control—still a major concern when most people think about robots today.

1920: Czech playwright Karel Čapek coins the word "robot" in his play

R.U.R. (Rossum's Universal Robots) .

1927: Fritz Lang's movie Metropolis shows robots in a bleakly dystopic, urban future.

1912: John Hammond, Jr. and Benjamin Miessner build an

electric dog that senses

and responds to light signals.

1948: William Grey Walter builds

autonomous robot tortoises.

1954: George Devol patents the Programmed Article Transfer (a forerunner of the Unimate industrial robot).

1956: Devol meets physicist

Joseph Engelberger and the two discuss working together to develop factory robots.

Their efforts ultimately lead to the formation of Unimation, a company that pioneers the manufacture of industrial robots by cooperating closely with companies such as General Motors (GM).

1962: GM installs its first industrial robot at a plant in Trenton, New Jersey.

1964: At Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (SAIL), PhD student

Rodney Schmidt (with help from artificial intelligence pioneer John

McCarthy) constructs a self-driving car based on a simple mechanical cart. Initially just remote controlled, it evolves into an

autonomous (but very primitive) self-driving car that can follow a painted white line.

1966: Factory robots capture the public imagination after a Unimate

appears on the Johnny Carson TV Show, demonstrating how to hit a

golf ball and pour a glass of beer.

1967: GM deploys 26 Unimate welding robots at its plant in Lordstown, Ohio, provoking industrial unrest among disruntled factory workers.

1968/69: Vic Scheinman develops

The Stanford Arm, an advanced, computer-controlled robot arm at SAIL.

1970: Ira Levin's bestselling humorous novel The Stepford Wives

imagines a world where independent women are quietly replaced by zombie-like

robots who happily do their husband's bidding.

1972: British military engineers develop the

Wheelbarrow, a

remote-controlled robot on tracks that can investigate booby-trapped

vehicles, buildings, and packages.

1973: Vic Scheinman starts Vicarm Inc. to manufacture industrial robot arms. In 1977, he sells the design to Unimation.

1978: Unimation develops Scheinman's robot into the PUMA (Programmable Universal Machine for Assembly). Unlike earlier robot arms, which are heavy hydraulic machines, it's compact, light, easy to program,

and powered by electric motors.

1997: 40 teams compete in the inaugural Robot World Cup (RoboCup): a soccer competition just for robots.

1998: Reading University robotics Professor Kevin Warwick becomes a cyborg

by having robotic circuitry implanted into his body.

1999: Sony introduces the AIBO robot dog, but discontinues production in 2006.

2002: iRobot launches the Roomba robot vacuum cleaner. (The key patents are filed

between 2000 and 2002.)

2004: iCub, a European-funded humanoid robot, the size of a small child, is released as an open-source project. Around 30 different iCubs are

built by academics and used for researching artificial intelligence

and robot emotions.

2004: DARPA launches the Grand Challenge—a competition to encourage engineers

to develop self-driving cars.

2005: Boston Dynamics creates BigDog, a computer-controlled robotic "pack mule"

designed to carry loads for soldiers. Later military robots include

Cheetah, PETMAN, and Atlas.

2012: Rethink Robotics, a company founded by Rodney Brooks, introduces the

Baxter factory robot.

2013: The SCHAFT S1 humanoid robot wins the trial stage of the DARPA Robotics Challenge to develop robots for emergency humanitarian work and disaster relief.

2015: Final of the DARPA Robotics Challenge.

2017: The European Parliament launches a thought-provoking draft report, urging governments to consider

wide-ranging issues like who should be responsible for robots, what rights they should have, and

how they will impact various aspects of "human" life we now take for granted.

2018: Robots help out at the Winter Olympics in South Korea.

Sponsored links

Find out more

On this website

Artificial intelligence

Handwriting recognition (OCR)

How computers work

History of computers

Internet and brain

Lidar

Speech synthesis

Stepper motors

Voice recognition

On other websites

Automaton: You'll find all the latest robotics news on this superb IEEE Spectrum blog.

IEEE History of Robotics and Automation: There are some great oral history interviews and videos about robotics and its pioneers on the IEEE History site.

Books

For older readers

Robots: The 500-Year Quest to Make Machines Human by Ben Russell. Science Museum/Scala, 2017. A fascinating survey of how robots and people continue to live side by side.

The Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of Mass Unemployment by Martin Ford. Basic Books, 2015/OneWorld, 2016. Is it finally time to wake up to a future ruled by robots?

Robotics: Modelling, Planning and Control by Bruno Siciliano, Lorenzo Sciavicco, and Luigi Villani. Springer, 2009. A much more theoretical introduction to robot control.

The Robotics Primer by Maja J. Matarić. MIT Press, 2007. An accessible easy-to-understand overview suitable for most readers.

Flesh and Machines: How Robots Will Change Us by Rodney A. Brooks. Vintage, 2003. A fascinating recent history of robotics, with an emphasis on the projects Brooks has been personally involved with (such as Cog, Kismet, Roomba, and Baxter).

March of the Machines by Kevin Warwick. Century, 1997. An old but still very interesting read, particularly for the way it describes how Warwick's robots have evolved from the bottom-up (with an emphasis on perception and action rather than cognition).

The Computer and the Mind by Philip Johnson-Laird. Fontana, 1993. How would you approach building a machine that could behave in human-like ways?

This wonderful book covers similar ground to my article but in much greater theoretical depth, with a strong emphasis on cognitive psychology.

Hobbyist/practical books

Robot Wars: Build Your Own Robot by James Cooper. Haynes, 2017. A spin-off from the popular series, geared mainly to remote-control robots rather than autonomous ones.

The Robot Builder's Bonanza by Gordon Mccomb and Myke Predko. McGraw Hill, 2006. A hands-on guide to robot hacking for hobbyists packed with ideas for robot projects.

123 Robotics Experiments for the Evil Genius by Michael Predko and Myke Predko. McGraw-Hill Professional, 2004. After a brief introduction to robotics, the Predko's get straight to work with toilet paper, glue, nuts, bolts, and anything else they can find.

For younger readers

Robot by Clive Gifford et al. DK, 2018. A lavishly illustrated, 160-page guide for ages 9–11 that features over 100 different robots.

Robots by Melissa Stewart. National Geographic, 2018. A colorful 48-page introduction for younger readers aged 6–9.

The Fascinating, Fantastic Unusual History of Robots

by Sean McCollum. Capstone Press, 2012. An engaging introduction packaged in a school-library format and suitable for ages 8–10.

Ultimate Robot by Robert Malone. DK, 2004. Combines history, science, and technology in a visually attractive format that will appeal to younger teenagers, in particular.

Articles

The Short, Strange Life of the First Friendly Robot by Yulia Frumer. IEEE Spectrum, May 21, 2020. Japanese scientist Makoto Nishimura—and his late-1920s quest to build a humanlike robot

Meet the Roomba's Ancestor: The Cybernetic Tortoise by Allison Marsh. IEEE Spectrum, February 28, 2020. A closer look at the seminal Grey Walter tortoise robots from the 1940s.

Remaking the World for Robots by Stacey Higginbotham. IEEE Spectrum, July 24, 2019. Why we'll need to redesign our world for a future where robots are more common.

Amazon Uses 800 Robots to Run This Warehouse by Evan Ackerman. IEEE Spectrum, June 5, 2019. The online retailer "employs" something like 200,000 robots worldwide.

So, Where Are All Those Robots? by Derek Thompson. The Atlantic, May 31, 2017. How will robots transform the economy?

How to Beat the Robots by

Claire Cain Miller. The New York Times, March 7, 2017. How can people compete in a world where artificially intelligent robots seem better qualified for more and more jobs?

The Long-Term Jobs Killer Is Not China. It's Automation. by Claire Cain Miller. The New York Times, December 21, 2016. Why robots are a bigger long-term threat than offshore manufacturing.

What Is a Robot? by Adrienne LaFrance. The Atlantic, March 22, 2016. It's harder to pin down the essence of a robot than you might think.

Automaton, Know Thyself: Robots Become Self-Aware by Charles Q. Choi, Scientific American, February 24, 2011. Can robots learn to adapt in the same way as humans?

Robots and cars for the future: BBC News, 26 June 2009. Ian Hardy visits the famous MIT Media Lab, where tomorrow's robots are being developed.

Videos

The best way to learn about cutting-edge robots is to watch them in action. So here's a small collection of 10 short videos I've compiled from YouTube (and elsewhere) that illustrate the past, present, and future of robotics. As you watch these films, try to imagine the engineering challenges the robot designers have had to solve in each case:

A robot nose: Could a robot ever learn to smell? Apparently, yes!

The MIT Leg Lab: Teaching robots to walk like turkeys!

Robots inspired by animals: Why should robots be modeled on humans? Here's a great summary of robotic creatures inspired by other marvels from the natural world.

Robot dog and robot cheetah developed for the US military.

Two chat robots argue about God: What happens when two robots try to hold a meaningful conversation about a difficult subject?

Developing emotional robots: How Kismet and other robots express emotions with humanlike face movements.

Robot octopuses and boneless robots show how innovative materials could make robots that will go to places no ordinary, metal, "mechanical" robot ever could.

Please do NOT copy our articles onto blogs and other websites

Articles from this website are registered at the US Copyright Office. Copying or otherwise using registered works without permission, removing this or other copyright notices, and/or infringing related rights could make you liable to severe civil or criminal penalties.

Text copyright © Chris Woodford 2007, 2019. All rights reserved. Full copyright notice and terms of use.

Follow us

Follow us on → Facebook

and find our photos on → Flickr

Rate this page

Please rate or give feedback on this page and I will make a donation to WaterAid.

Tell your friends

If you've enjoyed this website, please kindly tell your friends about us on your

favorite social sites.

Press CTRL + D to bookmark this page for later,

or email the link to a friend.

Cite this page

Woodford, Chris. (2007/2019) Robots. Retrieved from https://www.explainthatstuff.com/robots.html. [Accessed (Insert date here)]

More to explore on our website...

Communications

Computers

Electricity & electronics

Energy

Engineering

Environment

Gadgets

Home life

Materials

Science

Tools & instruments

Transportation

Home

A-Z index

Send feedback

Random article

Timeline

Teaching guide

About us

Privacy & cookies

↑ Back to top

The robotics revolution is here, and it's changing how we live

The robotics revolution is here, and it's changing how we live

Skip to contentNewslettersSubscribeMenuPremiumMAGAZINEThe robot revolution has arrivedMachines now perform all sorts of tasks: They clean big stores, patrol borders, and help children with autism. But will they improve our lives?With a firm yet delicate grip, a robot hand at the Robotics and Biology Laboratory at the Technical University of Berlin picks up a flower with its pneumatic fingers. Recent advances have brought robots closer than ever to mimicking human abilities.ByDavid BerrebyPhotographs bySpencer LowellAugust 18, 2020•40 min readThis story appears in the September 2020 issue of National Geographic magazine.If you’re like most people, you’ve probably never met a robot. But you will.I met one on a windy, bright day last January, on the short-grass prairie near Colorado’s border with Kansas, in the company of a rail-thin 31-year-old from San Francisco named Noah Ready-Campbell. To the south, wind turbines stretched to the horizon in uneven ranks, like a silent army of gleaming three-armed giants. In front of me was a hole that would become the foundation for another one.A Caterpillar 336 excavator was digging that hole—62 feet in diameter, with walls that slope up at a 34-degree angle, and a floor 10 feet deep and almost perfectly level. The Cat piled the dug-up earth on a spot where it wouldn’t get in the way; it would start a new pile when necessary. Every dip, dig, raise, turn, and drop of the 41-ton machine required firm control and well-tuned judgment. In North America, skilled excavator operators earn as much as $100,000 a year.The seat in this excavator, though, was empty. The operator lay on the cab’s roof. It had no hands; three snaky black cables linked it directly to the excavator’s control system. It had no eyes or ears either, since it used lasers, GPS, video cameras, and gyroscope-like sensors that estimate an object’s orientation in space to watch over its work. Ready-Campbell, co-founder of a San Francisco company called Built Robotics, clomped across the coarse dirt, climbed onto the excavator, and lifted the lid of a fancy luggage carrier on the roof. Inside was his company’s product—a 200-pound device that does work that once required a human being.“This is where the AI runs,” he said, pointing into the collection of circuit boards, wires, and metal boxes that made up the machine: Sensors to tell it where it is, cameras to let it see, controllers to send its commands to the excavator, communication devices that allow humans to monitor it, and the processor where its artificial intelligence, or AI, makes the decisions a human driver would. “These control signals get passed down to the computers that usually respond to the joysticks and pedals in the cab.”Some roboticists believe people are more comfortable around robots that look like Curi, from the Socially Intelligent Machines Lab at Georgia Tech. If a robot seems too much like a human, they say, people’s acceptance can plummet into “the uncanny valley,” Masahiro Mori’s term for our feelings when a robot seems less like an enhanced machine and more like a disturbingly diminished human—or a corpse.

Others create machines that imitate humans in detail—like Harmony, an expressive talking head that attaches to a silicone and steel sex doll made by Abyss Creations in San Marcos, California.

When I was a child in the 20th century, hoping to encounter a robot when I grew up, I expected it would look and act human, like C-3PO from Star Wars. Instead, the real robots that were being set up in factories were very different. Today millions of these industrial machines bolt, weld, paint, and do other repetitive, assembly-line tasks. Often fenced off to keep the remaining human workers safe, they are what roboticist Andrea Thomaz at the University of Texas has called “mute and brute” behemoths.Ready-Campbell’s device isn’t like that (although the Cat did have the words “CAUTION Robotic Equipment Moves Without Warning” stamped on its side). And of course it isn’t like C-3PO, either. It is, instead, a new kind of robot, far from human but still smart, adept, and mobile. Once rare, these devices—designed to “live” and work with people who have never met a robot—are migrating steadily into daily life.Already, in 2020, robots take inventory and clean floors in Walmart. They shelve goods and fetch them for mailing in warehouses. They cut lettuce and pick apples and even raspberries. They help autistic children socialize and stroke victims regain the use of their limbs. They patrol borders and, in the case of Israel’s Harop drone, attack targets they deem hostile. Robots arrange flowers, perform religious ceremonies, do stand-up comedy, and serve as sexual partners.New technology lets robots cope with the constant change and irregular shapes that humans encounter at work. Foodly, a collaborative robot (cobot) developed by RT Corporation, uses advanced vision, algorithms, and a grasping hand to place pieces of chicken in a bento box.And that was before the COVID-19 pandemic. Suddenly, replacing people with robots—an idea majorities of people around the world dislike, according to polls—looks medically wise, if not essential. (Read more about the skyrocketing demand for robots during the pandemic.)Robots now deliver food in Milton Keynes, England, tote supplies in a Dallas hospital, disinfect patients’ rooms in China and Europe, and wander parks in Singapore, nagging pedestrians to maintain social distance.This past spring, in the middle of a global economic collapse, the robotmakers I’d contacted in 2019, when I started working on this article, said they were getting more, not fewer, inquiries from potential customers. The pandemic has made more people realize that “automation is going to be a part of work,” Ready-Campbell told me in May. “The driver of that had been efficiency and productivity, but now there’s this other layer to it, which is health and safety.”Even before the COVID crisis added its impetus, technological trends were accelerating the creation of robots that could fan out into our lives. Mechanical parts got lighter, cheaper, and sturdier. Electronics packed more computing power into smaller packages. Breakthroughs let engineers put powerful data-crunching tools into robot bodies. Better digital communications let them keep some robot “brains” in a computer elsewhere—or connect a simple robot to hundreds of others, letting them share a collective intelligence, like a beehive’s.The workplace of the near future “will be an ecosystem of humans and robots working together to maximize efficiency,” said Ahti Heinla, co-founder of the Skype internet-call platform, now co-founder and chief technology officer of Starship Technologies, whose six-wheeled, self-driving delivery robots are rolling around Milton Keynes and other cities in Europe and the United States.Robots take inventory and clean at big stores. They patrol borders, perform religious ceremonies, and help autistic children.“We’ve gotten used to having machine intelligence that we can carry around with us,” said Manuela Veloso, an AI roboticist at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh. She held up her smartphone. “Now we’re going to have to get used to intelligence that has a body and moves around without us.”Outside her office, her team’s “cobots”—collaborative robots—roam the halls, guiding visitors and delivering paperwork. They look like iPads on wheeled display stands. But they move about on their own, even taking elevators when they need to (they beep and flash a polite request to nearby humans to push the buttons for them).“It’s an inevitable fact that we are going to have machines, artificial creatures, that will be a part of our daily life,” Veloso said. “When you start accepting robots around you, like a third species, along with pets and humans, you want to relate to them.”We’re all going to have to figure out how. “People have to understand that this isn’t science fiction; it’s not something that’s going to happen 20 years from now,” Veloso said. “It’s started to happen.”Vidal Pérez likes his new co-worker.ANYmal, a robot that can climb stairs, step delicately over debris, or crawl through tight spaces, strolls on a street near the offices of its maker, ANYbotics, in Zurich, Switzerland. Unlike wheeled robots, legged devices such as ANYmal can go almost anywhere people can— and places where they can’t, like areas contaminated by radioactive or chemical wastes.For seven years, working for Taylor Farms in Salinas, California, the 34-year-old used a seven-inch knife to cut lettuce. Bending at the waist, over and over, he would slice off a head of romaine or iceberg, shear off imperfect leaves, and toss it into a bin.Since 2016, though, a robot has done the slicing. It’s a 28-foot-long, tractorlike harvester that moves steadily down the rows in a cloud of mist from the high-pressure water jet it uses to cut off a lettuce head every time its sensor detects one. The cut lettuce falls onto a sloped conveyor belt that carries it up to the harvester’s platform, where a team of about 20 workers sorts it into bins.I met Pérez early one morning in June 2019, as he took a break from working a 22-acre field of romaine destined for Taylor’s fast-food and grocery store customers. A couple hundred yards away, another crew of lettuce cutters hunched over the plants, knives flashing as they worked in the old pre-robot style.“This is better, because you get a lot more tired cutting lettuce with a knife than with this machine,” Pérez said. Riding on the robot, he rotates bins on the conveyor belt. Not all the workers prefer the new system, he said. “Some people want to stay with what they know. And some get bored with standing on the machine, since they’re used to moving all the time through a field.”Some humans make use of wearable robots, or exoskeletons—combinations of sensors, computers, and motors. Arms with hooks attached, demonstrated by Sarcos Robotics engineer Fletcher Garrison, can lift up to 200 pounds—perhaps as an aid to airport luggage handlers.

Yukio Taguchi, a 59-year-old paraplegic, wears HAL (Hybrid Assistive Limb), developed by Cyberdyne. Taguchi was a surfer and snowboarder for more than 30 years. After a spinal cord injury, he began to train with HAL two times a month at Tsukuba Robocare Center in Tsukuba, Japan.

Grasping objects and manipulating them are crucial skills for robots that work with people. Human hands are more sensitive and nimble than any robot’s, but machines are improving. Using fingers inflated with compressed air to mimic a human hand’s soft touch, this robot at the Technical University of Berlin picks up an apple.Taylor Farms is one of the first major California agricultural companies to invest in robotic farming. “We’re going through a generational change … in agriculture,” Taylor Farms California president Mark Borman told me while we drove from the field in his pickup. As older workers leave, younger people aren’t choosing to fill the backbreaking jobs. A worldwide turn toward restrictions on cross-border migration, accelerated by COVID fears, hasn’t helped either. Farming around the world is being roboticized, Borman said. “We’re growing, our workforce is shrinking, so robots present an opportunity that’s good for both of us.”It was a refrain I heard often last year from employers in farming and construction, manufacturing and health care: We’re giving tasks to robots because we can’t find people to do them.At the wind farm site in Colorado, executives from the Mortenson Company, a Minneapolis-based construction firm that has hired Built’s robots since 2018, told me about a dire shortage of skilled workers in their industry. Built robots dug 21 foundations at the wind farm.“Operators will say things like, Oh, hey, here come the job killers,” said Derek Smith, lean innovation manager for Mortenson. “But after they see that the robot takes away a lot of repetitive work and they still have plenty to do, that shifts pretty quickly.”Once the robot excavator finished the dig we’d watched, a human on a bulldozer smoothed out the work and made ramps. “On this job, we have 229 foundations, and every one is basically the same spec,” Smith said. “We want to take away tasks that are repetitive. Then our operators concentrate on the tasks that involve more art.”The pandemic’s tsunami of job losses hasn’t changed this outlook, robotmakers and users told me. “Even with a very high unemployment rate, you can’t just snap your fingers and fill jobs that need highly specialized skills, because we don’t have the people that have the training,” said Ben Wolff, chairman and CEO of Sarcos Robotics.The Utah-based firm makes wearable robots called exoskeletons, which add the strength and precision of a machine to a worker’s movements. Delta Air Lines had just begun to test a Sarcos device with aircraft mechanics when the pandemic decimated air travel.When I reached Wolff last spring, he was upbeat. “There is a short-term slowdown, but long term we expect more business,” he said.Most employers are now looking to reduce contact among employees, and a device that lets one do the work of two might help. Since the pandemic began, Wolff told me, Sarcos has seen a jump in inquiries, some from companies he didn’t expect—for example, a major electronics firm, a pharmaceutical company, a meat-packer. The electronics- and pillmakers wanted to move heavy supplies with fewer people. The meat-packer was interested in spreading out its crowded workers.The RBO Hand 3 uses compressed air in its silicone fingers. When the robot grasps an apple, a flower, or a human hand, the fingers naturally take the shape of the thing grasped. The physics of the situation allows versatility. This “soft robotics” approach to design can create cheaper, more versatile machines—which humans will like. “People are more comfortable with humanlike robot hands,” says roboticist Steffen Puhlmann.

In a world that now fears human contact, it won’t be easy to fill jobs caring for children or the elderly. Maja Matarić, a computer scientist and roboticist at the University of Southern California, develops “socially assistive robots”—machines that do social support rather than physical labor. One of her lab’s projects, for example, is a robot coach that leads an elderly user through an exercise routine, then encourages the human to go outside and walk.“It says, ‘I can’t go outside, but why don’t you take a walk and tell me about it?’” Matarić told me. The robot is a white plastic head, torso, and arms that sits atop a rolling metal stand. But its sensors and software allow it to do some of what a human coach would do—for example, saying, “Bend your left forearm inward a little,” during exercise, or “Nice job!” afterward.We walked around her lab—a warren of young people in cubicles, working on the technologies that might let a robot help keep the conversation going in a support group, for example, or respond in a way that makes a human feel like the machine is empathizing. I asked Matarić if people ever got creeped out at the thought of a machine watching over Grandpa.“We’re not replacing caregivers,” she said. “We’re filling a gap. Grown-up children can’t be there with elderly parents. And the people who take care of other people in this country are underpaid and underappreciated. Until that changes, using robots is what we’ll have to do.”Days after I visited Matarić’s lab, in a different world 20 miles due south of the university, hundreds of longshoremen were marching against robots. This was in the San Pedro section of Los Angeles, where container cranes tower over a landscape of warehouses and docks and modest residential streets. Generations of people in this tight-knit community have worked as longshoremen on the docks. The current generation didn’t like a plan to bring robot cargo handlers to the port’s largest terminal, even though such machines already are common in ports worldwide, including others in the Los Angeles area.Designers shape each robot according to its duties—and the needs of people it works with. The five-foot-nine-inch, 222-pound HRP-5P, developed at Japan’s National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, has arms, legs, and a head and handles heavy loads in places such as construction sites and shipyards.

In contrast, SQ-2, a security robot, is limbless and quietly unassuming at slightly more than four feet tall and 143 pounds. Its shape accommodates a 360-degree camera, a laser mapping system, and a computer that allows the robot to patrol on its own.

The dockworkers don’t expect the world to stop changing, said Joe Buscaino, who represents San Pedro on the Los Angeles City Council. San Pedro has gone through economic upheavals before, as fishing, canning, and shipbuilding boomed and busted. The problem with robots, Buscaino told me, is the speed with which employers are dropping them into workers’ lives.“Years ago my dad saw that fishing was coming to an end, so he got a job in a bakery,” he said. “He was able to transition. But automation has the ability to take jobs overnight.”Economists disagree a great deal about how much and how soon robots will affect future jobs. But many experts do agree on one thing: Some workers will have a much harder time adapting to robots.“The evidence is fairly clear that we have many, many fewer blue-collar production jobs, assembly jobs, in industries that are adopting robots,” said Daron Acemoglu, an economist at MIT who has studied the effects of robots and other automation. “That doesn’t mean that future technology cannot create jobs. But the notion that we’re going to adopt automation technologies left, right, and center and also create lots of jobs is a purposefully misleading and incorrect fantasy.”For all the optimism of investors, researchers, and entrepreneurs at start-ups, many people, such as Buscaino, worry about a future full of robots. They fear robots won’t take over just grunt work but the whole job, or at least the parts of it that are challenging, honorable—and well paid. (The latter process is prevalent enough that economists have a name for it: “de-skilling.”) People also fear robots will make work more stressful, perhaps even more dangerous.Pound, a robot made by Kawada Robotics, helps assemble change dispensers at a Glory factory in Kazo, Japan. Each robot is part of a human-robot team that works together to build the product.Beth Gutelius, an urban planner and economist at the University of Illinois at Chicago who has researched the warehouse industry, told me about one warehouse she visited after it introduced robots. The robots were quickly delivering goods to humans for packing, and this was saving the workers a lot of walking back and forth. It also made them feel rushed and eliminated their chance to speak to one another.You May Also LikeMAGAZINEThis ‘SmartBird’ Is the Next Thing in Drone TechHISTORY MAGAZINEMedieval robots? They were just one of this Muslim inventor's creationsSCIENCEThe uncanny valley, explained: Why you might find AI creepyEmployers should consider that this kind of stress on employees “is not healthy, and it’s real, and it has impacts on the well-being of the workers,” said Dawn Castillo, an epidemiologist who manages occupational robot research at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health at the CDC. The Center for Occupational Robotics Research actually expects robot-related deaths “will likely increase over time,” according to its website. This is because there are more robots in more places with each passing year, but also because robots are working in new settings—where they meet people who don’t know what to expect and situations that their designers didn’t necessarily anticipate.In San Pedro, after Buscaino won a city council vote to block the automation plan, the International Longshore and Warehouse Union negotiated what the union’s local chapter president called a “bittersweet” deal with Maersk, the Danish conglomerate that operates the container terminal. The dockworkers agreed to end the fight against robots in exchange for 450 mechanics getting “upskilled”: trained to work on the robots. Another 450 workers will be “reskilled”: trained to work at new, tech-friendly jobs.How effective all that retraining will be, especially for middle-aged workers, remains to be seen, Buscaino said. A friend of his is a mechanic, whose background with cars and trucks leaves him well positioned to add robot maintenance to his skills. On the other hand, “my brother-in-law Dominic, who is a longshoreman today, he has no clue how to work on these robots. And he’s 56.”The word “robot” is precisely 100 years old this year. It was coined by the Czech writer Karel Čapek, in a play that set the template for a century’s machine dreams and nightmares. The robots in that play, R.U.R., look and act like people, do all the work of humans—and wipe out the human race before the curtain falls.Robot partners come in many forms. At Fluidics Instruments in Eindhoven, Netherlands, an employee works with seven robot arms to assemble parts for oil and gas burners. Like traditional factory robots, these cobots are efficient and precise—able to produce a thousand nozzles an hour. But unlike older machines, they adapt quickly to changed specs or a new task.

At Medical City Heart Hospital in Dallas, nurses work with Moxi, a robot built to learn and then perform tasks that take nurses away from patients, such as fetching supplies, delivering lab samples, and removing bags of soiled linens.

Ever since, imaginary robots from the Terminator to Japan’s Astro Boy to those Star Wars droids have had a huge influence on the plans of robotmakers. They also have shaped the public’s expectations of what robots are and what they can do.Tensho Goto is a monk in the Rinzai school of Japanese Zen Buddhism. A vigorous, sturdy man with a cheerful manner, Goto met me in a spare, elegant room at Kodai-ji, the 17th-century temple in Kyoto where he is the chief steward. He seemed the picture of tradition. Yet he has been dreaming of robots for many years. It began decades ago, when he read about artificial minds and thought about reproducing the Buddha himself in silicone, plastic, and metal. With android versions of the sages, he said, Buddhists could “hear their words directly.”Once he began collaborating with roboticists at Osaka University, though, robot reality dampened the robot dream. He learned that “as AI technology exists today, it is impossible to create human intelligence, let alone the personages of those who have attained enlightenment.” But like many roboticists, he didn’t give up, instead settling for what is possible today.It stands at one end of a white-walled room on the temple grounds: a metal and silicone incarnation of Kannon, the deity who in Japanese Buddhism embodies compassion and mercy. For centuries, temples and shrines have used statues to attract people and get them to focus on Buddhist tenets. “Now, for the first time, a statue moves,” Goto said.Mindar, as the robot is called, delivers prerecorded sermons in a forceful, not-quite-human female voice, gently gesticulating with her arms and turning her head from side to side to survey the audience. When her eyes fall on you, you feel something—but it isn’t her intelligence. There is no AI in Mindar. Goto hopes that will change over time, and that his moving statue will become capable of holding conversations with people and answering their religious questions.Robot soccer players have been taking the field since 1996 as part of an international league called Robo-Cup. Pitting the robot teams against one another in local, regional, and world championships is part fun and part research for roboticists around the world—even though humans will remain better at the game for decades to come. Here, Ishan Durugkar, a Ph.D. student in computer science at the University of Texas, prepares to put his school’s squad, the UT Austin Villa robot soccer team, through some drills.

Across the Pacific, in a nondescript house in a quiet suburb of San Diego, I met a man who seeks to provide a different kind of intimate experience with robots. Artist Matt McMullen is CEO of a company called Abyss Creations, which makes realistic, life-size sex dolls. McMullen leads a team of programmers, robotics specialists, special-effects experts, engineers, and artists who create robot companions that can appeal to hearts and minds as well as sex organs.The company has made silicone-skin, steel-skeleton RealDolls for more than a decade. They go for about $4,000. But these days, for an additional $8,000, a customer receives a robotic head packed with electronics that power facial expressions, a voice, and an artificial intelligence that can be programmed via a smartphone app.Like Siri or Alexa, the doll’s AI gets to know the user via the commands and questions he or she gives it. Below the neck, for now, the robot is still a doll—its arms and legs move only when the user manipulates them.“We don’t today have a real artificial intelligence that resembles a human mind,” McMullen acknowledges. “But I think we will. I think that is inevitable.” He has no doubt the market is there. “I think there are people who can greatly benefit from robots that look like people,” he said.We are getting attached already to ones that don’t look much like us at all.This isn’t science fiction. It’s not something that’s going to happen 20 years from now. It’s started.Manuela Veloso, Carnegie Mellon AI roboticistMilitary units have held funerals for bomb-clearing robots blown up in action. Nurses in hospitals tease their robot colleagues. People in experiments have declined to rat out their robot teammates. As robots get more lifelike, people probably will invest them with even more affection and trust—too much, perhaps. The influence of fantasy robots leads people to think that today’s real machines are far more capable than they really are. Adapting well to their presence among us, experts told me, must start with realistic expectations.Robots can be programmed or trained to do a well-defined task—dig a foundation, harvest lettuce—better or at least more consistently than humans can. But none can equal the human mind’s ability to do a lot of different tasks, especially unexpected ones. None has yet mastered common sense.Today’s robots can’t match human hands either, said Chico Marks, a manufacturing engineering manager at Subaru’s auto plant in Lafayette, Indiana. The plant, like those of all carmakers, has used standard industrial robots for decades. It’s now gradually adding new types, for tasks such as moving self-guided carts that take parts around the plant. Marks showed me a combination of wires that would snake through a curving section near a future car’s rear door.“Routing a wiring harness into a vehicle is not something that lends itself well to automation,” Marks said. “It requires a human brain and tactile feedback to know it’s in the right place and connected.”Robot legs aren’t any better. In 1996 Veloso, the Carnegie Mellon AI roboticist, was part of a challenge to create robots that would play soccer better than humans by 2050. She was one of a group of researchers that year who created the RoboCup tournament to spur progress. Today RoboCup is a well-loved tradition for engineers on several continents, but no one, including Veloso, expects robots to play soccer better than humans anytime soon.“It’s crazy how sophisticated our bodies are as machines,” she said. “We’re very good at handling gravity, dealing with forces as we walk, being pushed and keeping our balance. It’s going to be many years before a bipedal robot can walk as well as a person.”Through “tele-operation”—controlling a robot remotely via computer, smartphone, or even just eye movements—robots that navigate human spaces have expanded opportunities for people who are disabled. Though her mobility is limited by a neuromuscular disorder, Nozomi Murata, 34, works as a secretary in a Tokyo office via an OriHime robot created by OryLab. She tele-operates the robot from her home elsewhere in the city.

In the Minato City section of Tokyo, Murata’s tele-operated OriHime robot greets its inventor, Kentaro Yoshifuji, co-founder and CEO of OryLaboratory, which makes the robot. Yoshifuji created the device to alleviate loneliness by giving people a robotic means to connect directly with one another.

Robots are not going to be artificial people. We need to adapt to them, as Veloso said, as to a different species—and most robotmakers are working hard to engineer robots that make allowances for our human feelings. At the wind farm site, I learned that “bouncing” the toothed bucket of a big excavator against the ground is a sign of inexperience in a human operator. (The resulting jolt can actually injure the person in the cab.) To a robot excavator, the bounce makes little difference. Yet Built Robotics changed its robot’s algorithms to avoid bounce, because it looks bad to human professionals, and Mortenson wants workers of all species to get along.It’s not just people who change as robots come on line. Taylor Farms, Borman told me, is working on a new light bulb–shaped lettuce with a longer stalk. It won’t taste or feel different; that shape is just easier for a robot to cut.Bossa Nova Robotics makes a robot that roams thousands of stores in North America, including 500 Walmarts, scanning shelves to track inventory. The firm’s engineers asked themselves how friendly and approachable their robot should look. In the end it looks like a portable air conditioner with a six-and-a-half-foot-high periscope attached—no face or eyes.“It’s a tool,” explained Sarjoun Skaff, Bossa Nova’s co-founder and chief technology officer. He and the other engineers wanted shoppers and workers to like the machine, but not too much. Too industrial or too strange, and shoppers would flee. Too friendly, and people would chat and play with it and slow down its work. In the long run, Skaff told me, robots and people will settle on “a common set of human-robot interaction conventions” that will enable humans to know “how to interpret what the robot is doing and how to behave around it.” But for now, robotmakers and ordinary people are feeling their way there.Outside Tokyo, at the factory of Glory, a maker of money-handling devices, I stopped at a workstation where a nine-member team was assembling a coin-change machine. A plastic-sheathed sheet of paper displayed photos and names of three women, two men, and four robots.The gleaming white, two-armed robots, which looked a little like the offspring of a refrigerator and WALL·E, were named after currencies. As I watched the team swiftly add parts to a coin changer, a robot named Dollar needed help a couple of times—once when it couldn’t peel the backing off a sticker. A red light near its station went on, and a human quickly left his own spot on the line to fix the problem.Dollar has cameras on its “wrists,” but it also has a head with two camera eyes. “Conceptually it is meant to be a human-shaped robot,” explained manager Toshifumi Kobayashi. “So it has a head.”That little accommodation didn’t immediately convince the real humans, said Shota Akasaka, 32, a boyish and smiling team leader. “I was really not sure that it would be able to do human work, that it would be able to screw in a screw,” he said. “When I saw the screw go in perfectly, I realized we were at the dawn of a new era.”In a conference room northeast of Tokyo, I learned what it’s like to work with a robot in the closest way: by wearing it.A harvesting robot developed by Abundant Robotics uses suction to pick apples off trees in an orchard in Grandview, Washington. Robots increasingly are able to do agricultural tasks that once required the dexterity and precision of human hands. That’s a boon for farms coping with a shortage of human labor.Every hour at Nursery Waalzicht in Poederoijen, Netherlands, three robots made by ISO Group plant 18,000 flower plugs—seedlings that have just begun to grow—supervised by a single human worker.At Henri Willig farm in Katwoude, Netherlands, a cow decides to enter a Lely Astronaut A4 robot. When the animal walks up, the robot scans her collar and gives her a treat if she’s right about needing to be milked (if she’s not, she gets no treat and walks on). The machine does the milking automatically. Farmers monitor production and give the robot instructions via a touchpad.The exoskeleton, manufactured by a Japanese firm called Cyberdyne, consisted of two connected white tubes that curved across my back, a belt at my waist, and two straps on my thighs. It felt like being strapped into a parachute or an amusement park ride. I bent at the waist to lift a 40-pound container of water, which should have hurt my lower back. Instead, a computer in the tubes used the change in position to deduce that I was lifting an object, and motors kicked in to assist me. (More advanced users would have worn electrodes so the device could read the signals their brain was sending to their muscles.)The robot was designed to assist only my back muscles; when I squatted and put the effort into my legs, as you’re supposed to, the device didn’t help much. Still, when it worked, it seemed like a magic trick—I felt the weight, then I didn’t.Cyberdyne sees a large market in medical rehabilitation; it also makes a lower-limb exoskeleton that is being used to help people regain the use of their own legs. For many of its products, “another market will be for workers, so they can work longer and without risking injuries,” Cyberdyne spokesman Yudai Katami said.Sarcos Robotics, the other maker of exoskeletons, is thinking along similar lines. One purpose of his devices, said CEO Wolff, was “allowing humans to be more productive so they can keep up with the machines that enable automation.”Robots can do well-defined tasks, but none has mastered humans’ ability to multitask or use common sense.Will we adapt to the machines more than they adapt to us? We might be asked to. Roboticists dream of machines that make life better, but companies sometimes have incentives to install robots that don’t. Robots, after all, don’t need paid vacations or medical insurance. Beyond that, many nations get a lot of tax revenue from labor, while encouraging automation with tax breaks and other incentives. Companies thus save money by cutting employees and adding robots.“You get a lot of subsidies for installing equipment, especially digital equipment and robots,” Acemoglu said. “So that encourages firms to go for machines rather than humans, even if machines are no better.” Robots also are just more exciting than mere humans.There is “a particular zeitgeist among many technologists and managers that humans are troublesome,” Acemoglu said. There’s this feeling of, “You don’t need them. They make mistakes. They make demands. Let’s go for automation.”After Noah Ready-Campbell decided to go into construction robots, his father, Scott Campbell, spent more than three hours on a car ride gently asking him if this was really such a good idea. The elder Campbell, who used to work in construction himself, now represents the town of St. Johnsbury in Vermont’s general assembly. He quickly came to believe in his son’s work, but his constituents worry about robots, he told me, and it’s not all about economics. Perhaps it will be possible to give all our work to robots someday—even the work of religious ministry, even “sex work.” But Campbell’s constituents want to keep something for humanity: the work that makes humans feel valued.Mindar—a robotic incarnation of Kannon, the deity of mercy and compassion in Japanese Buddhism—faces Tensho Goto, a monk at the Kodaiji temple in Kyoto, Japan. Mindar, created by a team led by roboticist Hiroshi Ishiguro of Osaka University, can recite Buddhist teachings.

“What is important about work is not what you get for it but what you become by doing it,” Campbell said. “I feel like it’s profoundly true. That’s the most important thing about doing a job.”A century after they were first dreamed up for the stage, real robots are making life easier and safer for some people. They’re also making it a bit more robot-like. For many companies, that’s part of the attraction.“Right now every construction site is different, and every operator is an artist,” said Gaurav Kikani, Built Robotics’ vice president for strategy, operations, and finance. Operators like the variety; employers not so much. They save time and money when they know that a task is done the same way every time and doesn’t depend on an individual’s decisions. Though construction sites will always need human adaptability and ingenuity for some tasks, “with robots we see an opportunity to standardize practices and create efficiencies for the tasks where robots are appropriate,” Kikani said.In the moments when someone has to decide whose preferences ought to prevail, technology itself has no answers. However far they advance, there’s one task that robots won’t help us solve: Deciding how, when, and where to use them.David Berreby’s feature “The Things That Divide Us” appeared in the special Race Issue, April 2018. Photographer Spencer Lowell documented the construction of the Mars Curiosity rover for NASA.5:47Related TopicsROBOTSDRONESENGINEERINGINNOVATIONMACHINERYYou May Also LikeHISTORY & CULTUREHidden details from the Battle of the Bulge come to lightSCIENCEThis 'Gate to Hell' has burned for decades. Will we ever shut it?HISTORY & CULTUREIn 1969, the U.S. turned off Niagara Falls. Here’s what happened next.HISTORY MAGAZINEMeet the inventor of the BloodmobileSCIENCEIVF revolutionized fertility. Will these new methods do the same?Go FurtherAnimalsRare gray whale spotted in the Atlantic—and it's only the beginningAnimalsRare gray whale spotted in the Atlantic—and it's only the beginningWhy 'funga' is just as important as flora and faunaScienceWhy 'funga' is just as important as flora and faunaTermite fossils prove mating hasn't changed in 38 million yearsAnimalsTermite fossils prove mating hasn't changed in 38 million yearsPlay to find out which birds dominate at your feeder—and whyAnimalsPlay to find out which birds dominate at your feeder—and whyHow do fireflies get their glow? We finally have some answers.AnimalsHow do fireflies get their glow? We finally have some answers.Bird flu is spreading from pole to pole. Here’s why it matters.AnimalsBird flu is spreading from pole to pole. Here’s why it matters.EnvironmentMushroom leather? The future of fashion is closer than you think.EnvironmentMushroom leather? The future of fashion is closer than you think.This deadly fungus is hitchhiking its way across the worldEnvironmentThis deadly fungus is hitchhiking its way across the worldWhy 'funga' is just as important as flora and faunaScienceWhy 'funga' is just as important as flora and faunaThis exploding mine holds a treasure that may change the worldEnvironmentThis exploding mine holds a treasure that may change the worldHow animals are adapting to the rise of wildfiresEnvironmentHow animals are adapting to the rise of wildfiresFast fashion goes to die in this Chilean desertEnvironmentFast fashion goes to die in this Chilean desertHistory & CultureWho was the real Calamity Jane?History & CultureWho was the real Calamity Jane?See how these fierce dinos evolved in our pages over 100 yearsScienceSee how these fierce dinos evolved in our pages over 100 yearsHow did this female pharaoh survive being erased from history?History MagazineHow did this female pharaoh survive being erased from history?How Black artists helped make country music what it is todayHistory & CultureRace in AmericaHow Black artists helped make country music what it is todayThese 3 samurai women were heroes of shogun era JapanHistory & CultureThese 3 samurai women were heroes of shogun era JapanLincoln was killed before their eyes—then their own horror beganHistory & CultureLincoln was killed before their eyes—then their own horror beganScience'Exploding head syndrome'? Inside a mysterious sleep conditionScience'Exploding head syndrome'? Inside a mysterious sleep conditionWhat lifting weights does to your body—and your mindScienceMind, Body, WonderWhat lifting weights does to your body—and your mindMushroom leather? The future of fashion is closer than you think.EnvironmentMushroom leather? The future of fashion is closer than you think.Fungi could be the key to major cancer research breakthroughsScienceFungi could be the key to major cancer research breakthroughsWhy 'funga' is just as important as flora and faunaScienceWhy 'funga' is just as important as flora and faunaWhat is a lunar eclipse—and when will the next one happen?ScienceWhat is a lunar eclipse—and when will the next one happen?TravelKingston is making a comeback as culture capital of JamaicaTravelKingston is making a comeback as culture capital of JamaicaYou can watch wild horses roam free in this UK national parkTravelYou can watch wild horses roam free in this UK national parkWhere to stay in Zanzibar, Tanzania's 'spice island'TravelWhere to stay in Zanzibar, Tanzania's 'spice island'To see the real Los Angeles, visit its historic movie theatersTravelTo see the real Los Angeles, visit its historic movie theatersThis comedian went on a quest to find the end of the worldTravelThis comedian went on a quest to find the end of the worldHistory is alive on these European islandsTravelHistory is alive on these European islandsLegalTerms of UsePrivacy PolicyYour US State Privacy RightsChildren's Online Privacy PolicyInterest-Based AdsAbout Nielsen MeasurementDo Not Sell or Share My Personal InformationOur SitesNat Geo HomeAttend a Live EventBook a TripBuy MapsInspire Your KidsShop Nat GeoVisit the D.C. MuseumWatch TVLearn About Our ImpactSupport Our MissionMastheadPress RoomAdvertise With UsJoin UsSubscribeCustomer ServiceRenew SubscriptionManage Your SubscriptionWork at Nat GeoSign Up for Our NewslettersContribute to Protect the PlanetFollow usNational Geographic InstagramNational Geographic FacebookNational Geographic TwitterNational Geographic YoutubeNational Geographic LinkedinNational Geographic TiktokNational Geographic RedditUnited States (Change)Copyright © 1996-2015 National Geographic SocietyCopyright © 2015-2024 National Geographic Partners, LLC. All rights reserved

What Is a Robot? | WIRED

Is a Robot? | WIREDSkip to main contentOpen Navigation MenuMenuStory SavedTo revisit this article, visit My Profile, then View saved stories.Close AlertWhat Is a Robot?SecurityPoliticsGearBackchannelBusinessScienceCultureIdeasMerchMoreChevronStory SavedTo revisit this article, visit My Profile, then View saved stories.Close AlertSign InSearchSearchSecurityPoliticsGearBackchannelBusinessScienceCultureIdeasMerchPodcastsVideoWired WorldArtificial IntelligenceClimateGamesNewslettersMagazineEventsWIRED InsiderJobsCouponsMatt SimonScienceAug 24, 2017 7:00 AMWhat Is a Robot?Introducing "HardWIRED: Welcome to the Robotic Future," a new video series in which we explore the many fascinating machines that are transforming society.Save this storySaveSave this storySaveEditor’s note: This is the first entry in a new video series, HardWIRED: Welcome to the Robotic Future, in which we explore the many fascinating machines that are transforming society. And we can’t do that without first defining what a robot even is.When you hear the word “robot,” the first thing that probably comes to mind is a silvery humanoid, à la The Day the Earth Stood Still or C-3PO (more golden, I guess, but still metallic). But there’s also the Roomba, and autonomous drones, and technically also self-driving cars. A robot can be a lot of things these days―and this is just the beginning of their proliferation.With so many different kinds of robots, how do you define what one is? It's a physical thing―engineers agree on that, at least. But ask three different roboticists to define a robot and you’ll get three different answers. This isn't a trivial semantic conundrum: Thinking about what a robot really is has implications for how humanity deals with the unfolding robo-revolution.I’d like you to think about two drones. One you have to pilot yourself, and the other is autonomous, taking off, navigating obstacles, and landing all on its own. Are these both robots? Nope.“I would say that a robot is a physically embodied artificially intelligent agent that can take actions that have effects on the physical world,” says roboticist Anca Dragan of UC Berkeley. According to that definition, a robot has to make decisions that in turn make it useful―that is, avoiding things like running itself into trees. So your dumb, cheapo RC quadcopter is no more a robot than an RC car. An autonomous drone, however, is a thinking agent that senses and interacts with its world. It’s a robot.Intelligence, then, is a core component of what makes a robot a robot and not a wind-up toy. Kate Darling, a roboticist at the MIT Media Lab, agrees. “My definition of a robot, given that there is no very good universal definition, would probably be a physical machine that's usually programmable by a computer that can execute tasks autonomously or automatically by itself,” she says. “What a lot of people tend to follow is this sense, think, act paradigm." An RC drone can act, but only because you order it to. It can’t sense its environment or think about its next action. An autonomous drone, however, can do all three. It’s a physical embodiment of an artificial intelligence.Just how intelligent does a machine have to be to qualify as a robot, though? Lots of systems take in information from the outside world, process it, and then output an action—take the autopilot software that flies commercial planes. Hanumant Singh, a roboticist at Northeastern University, says a robot is "a system that exhibits 'complex' behavior and includes sensing and actuation.” He gives that definition to his students, then asks them to consider whether a Boeing 747 fits the bill. "It is automated, it is complex, it has sensing, it has actuation," he says. "The students argue that it is not a robot because humans operate it a lot of the time, even though it has an autopilot."Most PopularPoliticsThe Kate Middleton Photo Controversy Is an Inexplicable MessBrian BarrettScienceSolar-Powered Farming Is Quickly Depleting the World's Groundwater SupplyFred PearceSecurityAirbnb Bans All Indoor Security CamerasAmanda HooverScienceStumped by Heat Pumps?Rhett AllainAlso confusing are swallowable, magnetic "origami bots" that automatically unfold when they hit the acid of the stomach—reacting to their environment like an actually intelligent bot would. But then a human operator has to use magnets to steer them around the digestive system to pick up things that shouldn't be there, like swallowed batteries. Not so much a bot.If a machine is truly autonomous, there's a good chance it's a robot—but there are different degrees of autonomous intelligence. It's easy enough to program a machine to respond to a single environmental input with a single output. But as machine learning algorithms improve, robots will respond to their environments in ways that humans didn't explicitly teach them to. And that's the kind of intelligence that will get robots driving us around, helping the elderly, and keeping us company. “I'd say, yes, a robot is a physically embodied artificial intelligent agent," says Dragan, "but an artificially intelligent agent to me is an agent that acts to maximize a person's utility.” Meaning, new thinkier robots are more sensitive to the user's needs.To demonstrate, in her lab Dragan shows me a robotic arm her team has programmed. Grasping a mug, the arm sweeps across a table. But Dragan doesn’t want it sweeping so high, so she grabs the arm and forces it closer to the surface. But she hasn’t programmed the robot to sweep this low, so it returns to its previous altitude. Its intelligence is limited to the simple rules it's been given.The second time around, though, the arm reacts differently to Dragan’s correction. She forces it to a lower altitude and it recognizes her new demand, continuing the rest of its sweep at that level. It’s a responsive brand of robot that we’ll be seeing more of in this world. Think robots that are not only sensitive to our needs, but anticipate them. More and more, we won't need to intervene to correct robots' behavior, but will interact with robots that learn to adapt to our whims.This nuance is important, because "robot" is a powerful word. It is at once something that makes people uncomfortable (killer robots, job-stealing robots, etc.) and that makes them feel nice (Kuri the extremely endearing companion robot). “The word robot generates a lot of attention and fascination and sometimes fear,” says Darling. “You can use it to get people's attention. I mean, it's much sexier to call something a robot than call something a dishwasher.”For that matter, "robot" certainly sounds sexier than “physically embodied artificially intelligent agent.” But a robot is a machine that senses and acts on its world. And soon enough, our world will be full of them. Just probably not in, you know, a The Day the Earth Stood Still kind of way.Matt Simon is a senior staff writer covering biology, robotics, and the environment. He’s the author, most recently, of A Poison Like No Other: How Microplastics Corrupted Our Planet and Our Bodies.Staff WriterXTopicsroboticsMore from WIREDLos Angeles Just Proved How Spongy a City Can BeAs relentless rains pounded LA, the city’s “sponge” infrastructure helped gather 8.6 billion gallons of water—enough to sustain over 100,000 households for a year.Matt SimonGoogle’s Chess Experiments Reveal How to Boost the Power of AIBy rewarding computers that combined different approaches to solve chess puzzles, Google created an enhanced AI that could defeat its existing champion, AlphaZero.Stephen OrnesSelective Forgetting Can Help AI Learn BetterErasing key information during training allows machine learning models to learn new languages faster and more easily.Amos ZeebergSo You Want to Rewire BrainsWhen everyone's hooking their brains up to computers, we'll need surgeons to install the hardware.Caitlin KellyA Celebrated Cryptography-Breaking Algorithm Just Got an UpgradeTwo researchers have improved a well-known technique for lattice basis reduction, opening up new avenues for practical experiments in cryptography and mathematics.Madison GoldbergNeuralink’s First Brain Implant Is Working. Elon Musk’s Transparency Isn’tElon Musk says Neuralink’s first human trial subject can control a computer mouse with their brain, but some researchers are frustrated by a lack of information about the study.Emily Mullin23andMe Is Under Fire. Its Founder Remains ‘Optimistic’23andMe’s CEO Anne Wojcicki has saved the genetics company from the brink of failure before. She sat down with WIRED to talk about where it goes from here.Emily MullinFarming Prioritizes Cows and Cars—Not PeopleFarmers and scientists are getting better at growing more crops on less land, but they’re not focusing on plants that people eat.Matt ReynoldsWIRED is where tomorrow is realized. It is the essential source of information and ideas that make sense of a world in constant transformation. The WIRED conversation illuminates how technology is changing every aspect of our lives—from culture to business, science to design. The breakthroughs and innovations that we uncover lead to new ways of thinking, new connections, and new industries.More From WIREDSubscribeNewslettersFAQWIRED StaffEditorial StandardsArchiveRSSAccessibility HelpReviews and GuidesReviewsBuying GuidesCouponsMattressesElectric BikesFitness TrackersStreaming GuidesAdvertiseContact UsCustomer CareJobsPress CenterCondé Nast StoreUser AgreementPrivacy Policy & Cookie StatementYour California Privacy Rights© 2024 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. WIRED may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate Partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. Ad ChoicesSelect international siteUnited StatesLargeChevronUKItaliaJapónCzech Republic & SlovakiaFacebookXPinterestYouTubeInstagramTiktokDo Not Sell My Personal I